Advertisement

Synthese

, Volume 80, Issue 1, pp 63–79 | Cite as

Themes and schemes: A philosophical approach to interdisciplinary science teaching

  • Trace Jordan
Article

Abstract

An interdisciplinary fusion between the philosophy of science and the teaching of science can help to eradicate the disciplinary rigidity entrenched in both. In this paper I approach the history of sciencethematically, identifying general themes which transcend the boundaries of individual disciplines. Such conceptual themes can be used as a basis for an interdisciplinary introduction to university science, encouraging certain important cognitive skills not exercised during the disciplinary training emphasised in traditional approaches. Courses which teach themes such as conservation, randomness, and holism/reductionism have already proved successful, and these innovations should encourage philosophers and historians to explore the exciting new possibilities which arise from stepping outside the confines of a single discipline.

Keywords

Science Teaching Traditional Approach Cognitive Skill General Theme Philosophical Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, G.: 1978,Life Science in the Twentieth Century, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 187–228.Google Scholar
  2. Bechtel, W.: 1986, ‘The Nature of Scientific Integration’, in W. Bechtel (ed.),Integrating Scientific Disciplines, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp. 3–52.Google Scholar
  3. Bohm, D.: 1980,Wholeness and the Implicate Order, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  4. Bohr, N.: 1958,Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 98.Google Scholar
  5. Brush, S. G.: 1979, ‘Scientific Revolutionaries of 1905: Einstein, Rutherford, Chamberlin, Wilson, Stevens, Binet, Freud’, in M. Bunge and W. R. Shea (eds.),Rutherford and Physics at the Turn of the Century, Science History Publications, New York, pp. 140–71.Google Scholar
  6. Brush, S. G. and A. L. King: 1972,History in the Teaching of Physics, University Press of Naw England, Hanover.Google Scholar
  7. Burian, R.: 1986, ‘On Integrating the Study of Evolution and of Development’, in W. Bechtel (ed.),Integrating Scientific Disciplines, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp. 209–28.Google Scholar
  8. Edge, D. O. and M. Mulkay: 1976,Astronomy Transformed: The Emergence of Radio Astronomy in Britain, John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Elkana, Y.: 1974,The Discovery of the Conservation of Energy, Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
  10. Forman, P.: 1971, ‘Weimar Culture, Causality and Quantum Theory, 1918–1927: Adaption of German Physicists to a Hostile Intellectual Environment’,Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 3, 1–115.Google Scholar
  11. Garber, E., S. G. Brush and C. W. F. Everitt: 1986,Maxwell on Molecules and Gases, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 9–12.Google Scholar
  12. Guerlac, H.: 1976, ‘Chemistry as a Branch of Physics: Laplace's Collaboration with Lavoisier’,Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 8, 193–276.Google Scholar
  13. Holmes, F. L.: 1985,Lavoisier and the Chemistry of Life: An Exploration of Scientific Creativity, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.Google Scholar
  14. Holton, G.: 1973,Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought: Kepler to Einstein, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  15. Holton, G.: 1978,The Scientific Imagination: Case Studies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  16. Holton, G.: 1986,The Advancement of Science and Its Burdens, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  17. Humphries, G. M. K. and H. M. McConnell: 1982, ‘Nitroxide Spin Labels’, in G. Ehrestein and H. Lecar (eds.),Methods of Experimental Physics, vol. 20, Academic Press, New York, p. 53.Google Scholar
  18. Jacob, F.: 1982,The Logic of Life: A History of Heredity, Pantheon, New York, pp. 299–324.Google Scholar
  19. Judson, H. F.: 1979,The Eighth Day of Creation: The Makers of a Revolution in Biology, Touchstone, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Kay, L. E.: 1985a, ‘Conceptual Models and Analytical Tools: The Biology of Physicist Max Delbruck’,Journal of the History of Biology 18, 207–46.Google Scholar
  21. Kay, L. E.: 1985b, ‘The Secret of Life: Neils Bohr's Influence on the Biology Program of Max Delbruck’,Revista di Storia della Scienza 2, 487–510.Google Scholar
  22. Kuhn, T. S.: 1957, ‘Energy Conservation as an Example of Simultaneous Discovery’, in M. Clagett (ed.),Critical Problems in the History of Science, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp. 321–56.Google Scholar
  23. Laudan, L.: 1977,Progress and its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth, University of California Press, Berkeley, p. 175.Google Scholar
  24. Lemaine, G. and M. Mulkay: 1976,Perspectives on the Emergence of Scientific Disciplines, Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
  25. Llana, J. W.: 1985, ‘A Contribution of Natural History to the Chemical Revolution of France’,Ambix 32, 71–91.Google Scholar
  26. Mayr, E.: 1982,The Growth of Biological Thought, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp. 21–82.Google Scholar
  27. Melhado, E.: 1985, ‘Chemistry, Physics, and the Chemical Revolution’,ISIS 76, 195–211.Google Scholar
  28. Olby, R.: 1974,The Path to the Double Helix, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  29. Parsegian, V. L.: 1971, ‘An Integrated Science Course for University Students’, in P. E. Richmond (ed.),New Trends in Integrated Science Teaching, vol. 1, Unesco, Paris.Google Scholar
  30. Porter, T.: 1981, ‘A Statistical Survey of Gases: Maxwell's Social Physics’,Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 12, 77–116.Google Scholar
  31. Portugal, F. H. and J. S. Cohen: 1977,A Century of DNA: A History of the Discovery of the Structure and Function of the Genetic Substance, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  32. Prigogine, I. and I. Stengers: 1974,Order Out of Chaos, Bantam Books, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Reif, F.: 1971, ‘Science Education’, in P. E. Richmond (ed.),New Trends in Integrated Science Teaching, vol. 1, Unesco, Paris.Google Scholar
  34. Russell, E. S.: 1916,Form and Function: A Contribution to the History of Animal Morphology, John Murray, London.Google Scholar
  35. Russell, E. S.: 1924,The Study of Living Things: Prolegomena to a Functional Biology, Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  36. Russell, E. S.: 1930,The Interpretation of Development and Heredity: A Study in Biological Method, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  37. Roll-Hansen, N.: 1984, ‘E. S. Russell and J. H. Woodger: The Failure of Two Twentieth-Century Opponents of Mechanistic Biology’,Journal of the History of Biology 17, 399–428.Google Scholar
  38. Trainor, L. E. H.: 1985, ‘Remarks on Emergence in Physics and Biology’, in P. L. Antonelli (ed.),Mathematical Essays on Growth and the Emergence of Form, University of Alberta Press, Edmonton, p. 202.Google Scholar
  39. Whitley, R.: 1980, ‘The Context of Scientific Investigation’, in K. D. Knorr, R. Krohn and R. Whitley (eds.),The Social Process of Scientific Investigation, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, p. 310.Google Scholar
  40. Woodger, J. H.: 1929,Biological Principles: A Critical Study, K. Paul, Trench, Trubner, London, p. 481; emphasis added.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Trace Jordan
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for History and Philosophy of Science and TechnologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations