Skip to main content
Log in

Models of voting behavior in survey research

Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines two models used in survey research to explain voting behavior. Although the models rely on the same data they make radically different predictions about the political future. Nevertheless, both models may be more or less correct. The models represent interacting systems and it may be impossible to get a “super model” of the interactions between their elements. In the natural sciences causal relationships between the elements of interacting models can often be ignored. Because voting behavior models describe phenomena that are roughly the same size, the reciprocal relationships between elements of different models severely restrict the predictive power of voting behavior models. Certain analogies, and disanalogies, between the use of models in natural and social science explain why the social sciences cannot predict many of the events they are able to explain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Asher, H.: 1976,Causal Modeling, Sage Publications, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher, H.: 1983, ‘Voting Behavior Research in the 1980s: An Examination of Some Old and New Problems’, in Ada W. Finifter (ed.),Political Science: The State of the Discipline, The American Political Science Association, Washington, pp. 339–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellucci, P.: 1984, ‘Economic Concerns in Italian Electoral Behavior: Toward a Rational Electorate?’,Political Behavior 6, 321–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, Mark: 1984, ‘Paradigms Versus Research Programmes in the History of Economics’, in Daniel M. Hausman (ed.),The Philosophy of Economics: An Anthology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 360–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budge, I., I. Crewe and D. Farlie (eds.): 1976,Party Identification and Beyond, John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, W. D.: 1970,Critical Elections and the Mainstream of American Politics, W. W Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, W. D.: 1974a, ‘Theory and Voting Results: Some Reflections on Converse's ‘Change in the American Electorate”,American Political Science Review 68, 1002–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, W. D.: 1974b, ‘Rejoinder to ‘Comments’ by Philip Converse and Jerrold Rusk’,American Political Science Review 68, 1050–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, W. D.: 1982,The Current Crisis in American Politics, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, W. D.: 1984, ‘The Eclipse of the Democratic Party’,Society 21, 5–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. and P. Converse (eds.): 1972,The Human Meaning of Social Change, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., P. Converse, W. Miller, and D. Stokes: 1960,The American Voter, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N.: 1983,How the Laws of Physics Lie, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, P.: 1969, ‘Of Time and Partisan Stability’,Comparative Political Studies, 13–71.

  • Converse, P.: 1974, ‘Comments on Burnham's ‘Theory and Voting Research’’,American Political Science Review 68, 1024–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, P.: 1975, ‘Public Opinion and Voting Behavior’, in Greenstein (ed.),The Handbook of Political Science, Adison Wesley. Reading, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, P. and G. Markus: 1979, ‘Plus ca change...The New CPS Election Study Panel’,American Political Science Review 73, 32–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, Robert S. and Kent L. Tedin: 1981, ‘The 1928–1936 Partisan Realignment: The Case for the Conversion Hypothesis’,American Political Science Review, 951–61.

  • Friedman, Milton L.: 1974, ‘The Methodology of Positive Economics’, in Frank Hahn and Martin Hollis (eds.),Philosophy and Economic Theory, The Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 18–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R.: 1979,Understanding Scientific Reasoning, Hold Rinehardt and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R.: 1984, ‘Toward a Unified Theory of Science’, unpublished manuscript, Indiana University, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R.: 1985, ‘Philosophy of Science Naturalized’,Philosophy of Science 52, 331–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I.: 1983,Representing and Intervening, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy, B.: 1985, ‘1880 Voting in California and Ohio: Victorian Super-Citizens?’,American Politics Quarterly 13, 323–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelen, Ted: 1986,Progress in Electoral Research: The Interplay of Competing Research Programs, The American Academy of Higher Education, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiewiet, R. and D. Rivers: 1984, ‘A Retrospective on Retrospective Voting’,Political Behavior 6, 369–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, D. and R. Kiewiet: 1979, ‘Economic Discontent and Political Behavior: The Role of Personal Grievances and Collective Economic Judgments in Congressional Voting’,American Journal of Political Science 23, 493–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas: 1962,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, E.: 1982,Where Have All the Voters Gone? W. W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck, M.: 1983, ‘Economics and the French Voter: A Microanalysis’,Public Opinion Quarterly 47, 345–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. and O. Listhaug: 1984, ‘Economic Effects on the Vote in Norway’,Political Behavior 6, 301–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Warren E.: 1984a, ‘Plans for the 1984 National Election Study’, presented to the Southwestern Social Science Association, Fort Worth, Texas, March 23, 1984.

  • Miller, Warren E.: 1984b, ‘The Scar of the Turbulent Decade’,Society 21, 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Alexander: 1983, ‘If Economics Isn't Science, What Is It?’,The Philosophical Forum, pp. 296–314.

  • Rusk, Jerrold G.: 1974, ‘Comment: The American Electoral Universe: Speculation and Evidence’,American Political Science Review, pp. 1028–49.

  • Sigelman, L.: 1984, ‘Not a Bang But a Whimper’.,Society 21, 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Fraassen, B.: 1980,The Scientific Image, The Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams M.: 1973, ‘Falsifiable Predictions of Evolutionary Theory’,Philosophy of Science 40, 518–37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Thanks are due to a number of people, particularly to Ted Jelen for invaluable advice, encouragement and editorial assiatance, and to Sid Mikis, Paul Teller and Walter Dean Burnham for helpful and insightful comments. Research for this paper was supported by grants from the National Endowment for the Humanities (Grant #FT-23537), Faculty Development of DePauw University and the Humanities Division of Illinois Benedictine College.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chandler, M. Models of voting behavior in survey research. Synthese 76, 25–48 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869640

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869640

Keywords

Navigation