Skip to main content
Log in

Organism-environment mutuality epistemics, and the concept of an ecological niche

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of an ecological niche (econiche) has been used in a variety of ways, some of which are incompatible with a relational or functional interpretation of the term. This essay seeks to standardize usage by limiting the concept to functional relations between organisms and their surroundings, and to revise the concept to include epistemic relations. For most organisms, epistemics are a vital aspect of their functional relationships to their surroundings and, hence, a major determinant of their econiche. Rejecting the traditional dualism of organism and environment, an econiche is defined as the reciprocal (dual) of a functionally specified class of organisms (FSTU). From this perspective, an econiche necessarily implies a certain type of organism, and a class of functionally similar organisms implies a special econiche.

The econiche concept is also discussed in relation to other ecological terms that reflect the distributional patterns of organisms, such as “habitat’, and the concept of an “empty niche” is criticized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, J.: 1976, ‘The Sensing of Chemicals by Bacteria’,Sci. Amer. 234, 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alley, T. R.: 1982, ‘Competition Theory, Evolution, and the Concept of an Ecological Niche’,Acta Biotheor. 31, 165–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, H. S.: 1951, ‘North American Fireflies of the GenusPhoturis’,Smithson. Misc. Coll. 117, 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R. A.: 1979, ‘Evolution of Niche Breadth in Populations of Ants’,Amer. Natur. 114, 533–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore, R. P. and R. B. Frankel: 1981, ‘Magnetic Navigation in Bacteria’,Sci. Amer. 245(6), 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botkin, D. B.: 1975, ‘A Functional Approach to the Niche Concept in Forest Communities’, in G. S. Innis (ed.),New Directions in the Analysis of Ecological Systems (Pt. 2), Society for Computer Simulation, La Jolla, California, pp. 149–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1977,Treatise on Basic Philosophy (Vol. 3). Ontology I: The Furniture of the World, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, F. B. and T. M. Fenchel: 1977,Theories of Populations in Biological Communities (Ecological Studies 20), Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody, M. L.: 1973, ‘Parallel Evolution and Bird Niches’, in F. di Castri and H. A. Mooney (eds.),Mediterranean Type Ecosystems (Ecological Studies 7), Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 307–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody, M. L.: 1975, ‘Towards a Theory of Continental Species Diversities: Bird Distributions Over Mediterranean Habitat Gradients’, in M. L. Cody and J. M. DiamondEcology and Evolution of Communities, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp. 214–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, R. K. and E. R. Fuentes: 1975, ‘Experimental Studies of the Niche’,Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 6, 281–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, R. K. and D. J. Futuyma: 1971, ‘On the Measurement of Niche Breadth and Overlap’,Ecology 52, 567–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, C. B., I. N. Healey, and P. D. Moore: 1976,Biogeography: An Ecological and Evolutionary Approach (2nd ed.), John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demetrius, L.: 1977, ‘Adaptedness and Fitness’,Amer. Natur. 111, 1163–1168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. M.: 1978, ‘Niche Shifts and the Rediscovery of Interspecific Competition’,Amer. Sci. 66, 322–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton, C.: 1927,Animal Ecology, Sidgwick and Jackson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton, C.: 1950,The Ecology of Animals (3rd ed.), Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton, C. S. and R. S. Miller: 1954, ‘The Ecological Survey of Animal Communities: With a Practical System of Classifying Habitats by Structural Characteristics’,J. Ecol. 42, 460–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, J. M.: 1973,Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, Addison-Wesley, Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenton, M. B. and J. H. Fullard: 1981, ‘Moth Hearing and the Feeding Strategies of Bats’,Amer. Sci. 69, 266–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M. T.: 1974,The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J.: 1966,The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J.: 1977, ‘The Theory of Affordances’, in R. Shaw and J. Bransford (eds.),Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 67–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J.: 1979,The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J.: 1982, ‘Notes on Affordances’, in E. Reed and R. Jones (eds.),Reasons for Realism: Selected Essays of James J. Gibson. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 401–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesel, J. T.: 1974,The Biology and Adaptability of Natural Populations, C. V. Mosby, St. Louis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, P. R.: 1981, ‘Speciation and the Adaptive Radiation of Darwin's Finches’,Amer. Sci. 69, 653–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, L.: 1979, ‘The Use of Psychophysical Unfolding Theory to Determine Principal Resource Axes’,Amer. Natur. 114, 695–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinnell, J.: 1914, ‘An Account of the Mammals and Birds of the Lower Colorado Valley’,Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 12, 51–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinnell, J.: 1917, ‘The Niche-Relationships of the California Thrasher’,Auk 34, 427–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinnell, J.: 1924, ‘Geography and Evolution’,Ecology 5, 225–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haefner, J. W.: 1980, ‘Two Metaphors of the Niche’,Synthese 43, 123–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A.: 1952,The Sensory Order: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Theoretical Psychology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heatwole, H.: 1977, ‘Habitat Selection in Reptiles’, in C. Gans and D. W. Tinkle (eds.),Biology of the Reptilia (Vol. 7: Ecology and Behaviour A), Academic Press, New York, pp. 137–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, L. J.: 1913,The Fitness of the Environment, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilden, O.: 1965, ‘Habitat Selection in Birds’,Ann. Zool. Fenn. 2, 53–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde, R. A.: 1982,Ethology: Its Nature and Relations With Other Sciences, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G. E.: 1957, ‘Concluding Remarks’,Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 22, 415–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G. E.: 1965,The Ecological Theatre and the Evolutionary Play. Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G. E.: 1978,An Introduction to Population Ecology, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, R. G.: 1978, ‘Ecological Niche Dimensions and Sensory Functions in Amphibians’, in M. A. Ali (ed.),Sensory Ecology: Review and Perspectives, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 169–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, T. D. and M. T. Turvey: 1980, ‘A Sketch of an Ecological Metatheory for Theories of Learning’, in G. H. Bower (ed.),The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 14), Academic Press, New York, pp. 147–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R. and F. C. James: 1975, ‘Eco-Morphological Configurations and Convergent Evolution in Species and Communities’, in M. L. Cody and J. M. Diamond (eds.),Ecology and Evolution of Communities, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp. 258–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendeigh, S. C.: 1961,Animal Ecology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettlewell, B.: 1973,The Evolution of Melanism, Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsolver, J. G. and W. B. Watt: 1983, ‘Thermoregulatory Strategies inColias Butterflies: Thermal Stress and the Limits to Adaptation in Temporally Varying Environments’,Amer. Natur. 121, 32–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleerehoper, H., J. B. Waxman, and J. Matis: 1973, ‘Interaction of Temperature and Copper Ions as Orienting Stimuli in the Locomotor Behavior of the Goldfish (Carassius auratus);J. Fish. Res. Can. 30, 725–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klomp, H.: 1961, ‘The Concepts “Similar Ecology” and “Competition” in Animal Ecology’,Arch. Neerl. Zool. 14, 90–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer, P. H.: 1969,Habitats and Territories: A Study of the Use of Space by Animals, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer, P. H.: 1973,Behavioral Aspects of Ecology (2nd ed.), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, C. J.: 1978,Ecology: The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance (2nd ed.), Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulesza, G.: 1975, ‘Comment on “Niche, Habitat, and Ecotope”’,Amer. Natur. 109, 476–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack, D.: 1971,Ecological Isolation in Birds, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lautman, A.: 1971, ‘Symmetry and Dissymmetry in Mathematics and Physics’, in F. LeLionnais (ed.),Great Currents of Mathematical Thought (Vol. 1), Dover, New York, pp. 44–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, E. G.: 1971,Adaptation and Diversity, Freeman, Cooper, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R.: 1968,Evolution in a Changing Environment: Some Theoretical Applications, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R.: 1979, ‘Coexistence in a Variable Environment’,Amer. Natur. 114, 765–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C.: 1978, ‘Adaptation’,sci. Amer. 239 (3), 212–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lythgoe, J. N.: 1978, ‘Fishes: Vision in Dim Light and Surrogate Senses’, in M. A. Ali (ed.),Sensory Ecology: Review and Perspective, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 155–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H.: 1968, ‘The Theory of the Niche’, in R. C. Lewontin (ed.),Population Biology and Evolution, Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, pp. 159–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMahon, J. A., D. J. Schimpf, D. C. Andersen, K. G. Smith, and R. L. Bayn: 1981, ‘An Organism-Centered Approach to Some Community and Ecosystem Concepts’,J. Theor. Biol. 88, 287–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, B., Jr.: 1973, Niche Response Structure and the Analytical Potential of its Relationship to the Habitat’,Amer. Natur. 107, 213–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, R. P.: 1963, ‘Ecosystems, Evolution and Relational Patterns of Living Organisms’,Amer. Sci. 51, 246–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelsen, A.: 1979, ‘Insect Ears as Mechanical Systems’,Amer. Sci. 67, 696–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. S.: 1967, ‘Pattern and Process in Competition’,Adv. Ecol. Res. 4, 1–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, L. J. and M. Milne: 1978, ‘Insects of the Water Surface’,Sci. Amer. 234 (4), 134–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E. P.: 1959,Fundamentals of Ecology (2nd ed.), W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, T.: 1954, ‘Experimental Studies of Interspecies Competition. II. Temperature, Humidity and Competition in Two Species ofTribolium’,Physiol. Zool. 27, 177–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patten, B. C.: 1982, ‘Environs: Relativistic Elementary Particles for Ecology’,Amer. Natur. 119, 179–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patten, B. C. and G. T. Auble: 1980, ‘Systems Approach to the Concept of Niche’,Synthese 43, 155–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patten, B. C. and G. T. Auble: 1981, ‘Systems Theory of the Ecological Niche’,Amer. Natur. 117, 893–922.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka, E. R.: 1976, ‘Competition and Niche Theory’, in R. M. May (ed.),Theoretical Ecology: Principles and Applications, W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp. 114–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka, E. R.: 1983,Evolutionary Ecology (3rd ed.), Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J. R. and C. E. Taylor: 1979, ‘Genetic Variation in Ecologically Diverse Environments’,Amer. Sci. 67, 590–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs, R. E.: 1973,Ecology, Chiron Press, Portland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root, R. B.; 1967, ‘The Niche Exploitation Patterns of the Blue-Gray Gnatcatcher’,Ecol. Monogr. 37, 317–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R.: 1978,Fundamentals of Measurement and Representation of Natural Systems, North-Holland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden, J.: 1974, ‘The Fundamental and Realized Niche of a Solitary Population’,Amer. Natur. 108, 232–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sage, R. D.: 1973, ‘Ecological Convergence of the Lizard Faunas of the Chaparral Communities in Chile and California’, in F. di Castri and H. A. Mooney (eds.),Mediterranean Type Ecosystems (Ecological Studies 7), Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 339–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sales, G. and J. D. Pye: 1974,Ultrasonic Communication by Animals, Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, J. M.: 1958, ‘The Concept of Ecologic Niche, with Reference to the Theory of Natural Coexistence’,Evolution 12, 111–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener, T. W.: 1965, ‘The Evolution of Bill Size Differences Among Sympatric Congeneric Species of Birds’,Evolution 19, 189–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener, T. W.: 1977, ‘Competition and the Niche’, in C. Gans and D. W. Tinkle (eds.),Biology of the Reptilia (Vol. 7: Ecology and Behaviour A), Academic Press, New York, pp. 35–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selander, R. K.: 1966, ‘Sexual Dimorphism and Differential Niche Utilization in Birds’,Condor 68, 113–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R. and J. Bransford: 1977, ‘Introduction: Psychological Approaches to the Problem of Knowledge’, in R. Shaw and J. Bransford (eds.),Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R. and M. T. Turvey: 1981, ‘Coalitions as Models for Ecosystems: A Realist Perspective on Perceptual Organization’, in M. Kubovy and J. Pomerantz (eds.),Perceptual Organization, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 343–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R., M. T. Turvey, and W. Mace: 1982, ‘Ecological Psychology: The Consequences of a Commitment to Realism’, in W. B. Weimer and D. S. Palermo (eds.),Cognition and the Symbolic Processes II, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 159–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. and P. H. A. Sneath: 1963,Principles of Numerical Taxonomy, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, K. and L. Roche: 1974,Genetics of Forest System Ecosystems (Ecological Studies 6), Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, D. R. and T. S. Ray: 1975, ‘Host Tree Location Behavior of a Tropical Vine (Monstera gigantea) by Skototropism’,Science 190, 804–806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. W.: 1917,On Growth and Form, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, M. T. and R. Shaw: 1979 ‘The Primacy of Perceiving: An Ecological Reformulation of Perception for Understanding Memory’, in L.-G. Nilsson (ed.),Perspectives on Memory Research, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 167–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, M. T., R. E. Shaw, E. S. Reed, and W. M. Mace: 1981, ‘Ecological Laws of Perceiving and Acting: In Reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn (1981)’,Cognition 9, 237–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udvardy, M. F. D.: 1959, ‘Notes on the Ecological Concepts of Habitat, Biotope and Niche’,Ecology 40, 725–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeer, J. H.: 1972, ‘Niche Theory’,Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3, 107–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Valen, L.: 1965, ‘Morphological Variation and the Width of the Ecological Niche’,Amer. Natur. 100, 377–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeij, G. J.: 1978,Biogeography and Adaptation: Patterns of Marine Life, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, J.: 1957, ‘A Stroll Through the Worlds of Animals and Men’, in C. H. Schiller (ed.),Instinctive Behavior, International Universities Press, New York, pp. 5–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wangersky, P. J.: 1972, ‘Evolution and the Niche Concept’,Trans. Conn. Acad. Arts Sci. 44, 369–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Went, F. W.: 1968, ‘The Size of Man’,Amer. Sci. 56, 400–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H.: 1962, ‘Classification of Natural Communities’,Bot. Rev. 28, 1–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H. and S. A. Levin (eds.): 1975,Niche: Theory and Application, Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg, Pa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H., S. A. Levin, and R. B. Root: 1973, ‘Niche, Habitat, and Ecotope’,Amer. Natur. 107, 321–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, M.: 1972,The Analysis of Biological Populations, Edward Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuenscher, J. E.: 1969, ‘Niche Specification and Competition Modeling’,J. Theor. Biol. 25, 436–443.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Special thanks are due to Michael Turvery for his part in many stimulating discussions of some of the problems and concepts addressed in this paper. I am also grateful to him and to Claudia Carello, Tim Johnston, Bill Mace, Bernard Patten, Ed Reed, Robert E. Shaw, Bill Warren, and an anonymous reviewer for their comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alley, T.R. Organism-environment mutuality epistemics, and the concept of an ecological niche. Synthese 65, 411–444 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869278

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869278

Keywords

Navigation