Skip to main content
Log in

Hemocyte responses to implanted tissues inDrosophila melanogaster larvae

  • Published:
Wilhelm Roux's archives of developmental biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

At 26° C temperature-sensitivetu(1) Sz ts larvae ofDrosophila melanogaster develop melanotic tumors consisting of aberrant caudal adipose tissue encapsulated by precociously differentiated hemocytes (lamellocytes). Whentu-Sz ts larvae are grown at 18° C, lamellocytes are present but the caudal fat body surfaces remain normal and melanotic tumors do not develop (Rizki and Rizki, preceding paper). In this paper we demonstrate that the lamellocytes intu-Sz ts larvae at 18° C encapsulate implants of mechanically-damaged fat bodies and adipose cells devoid of basement membrane, while leaving host fat bodies or implanted fat bodies with intact basement membrane unencapsulated. Therefore, low temperature blocks melanotic tumor formation by normalizing the surfaces of the prospective tumor-forming sites intu-Sz ts.

The discriminatory ability oftu-Sz ts lamellocytes was examined by challenging them with undamaged heterospecific tissues. Tissues from sibling species ofD. melanogaster were not encapsulated whereas tissues fromDrosophila species outside theD. melanogaster species subgroup were. Ultrastructural examination of encapsulated heterospecific tissues showed intact basement membrane, so we propose that distinction between “self” and “not self” by lamellocytes depends upon the molecular architecture of the basement membrane. In similar series of experiments usingD. virilis donor tissues inOre-R wild type larval hosts, fat bodies remained unencapsulated and imaginal disks metamorphosed. These studies suggest that continued presence of lamellocytes in the larval host is a prerequisite for encapsulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beadle GW, Ephrussi B (1935) Transplantation inDrosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 21:642–646

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenstein D (1956) In: Campbell FL (ed), Physiology of insect development. The University of Chicago Press, pp 77–80

  • Rizki RM, Rizki TM (1979) Cell interactions in the differentiation of a melanotic tumor inDrosophila. Differentiation 12:167–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rizki TM (1962) Experimental analysis of hemocyte morphology in insects. Am Zool 2:247–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizki TM (1964) Mutant genes regulating the inducibility of kynurenine synthesis. J Cell Biol 21:203–211

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rizki TM, Rizki RM (1978) The role of hemocytes in melanotic tumor formation. In: Bulla LA, Cheng TC (eds.), Comparative pathobiology vol. 4. Plenum Press, New York pp 85–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizki TM, Rizki RM (in press) Properties of the larval hemocytes ofDrosophila melanogaster. Experientia

  • Rizki TM, Rizki RM (1980) Developmental analysis of a temperature-sensitive melanotic tumor mutant inDrosophila melanogaster. Wilhelm. Roux's Archives 189:197–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt G (1970) The cellular defense reactions of insects. University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott MT (1971) Recognition of foreignness in invertebrates. Transplantation 11:78–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rizki, R.M., Rizki, T.M. Hemocyte responses to implanted tissues inDrosophila melanogaster larvae. Wilhelm Roux' Archiv 189, 207–213 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00868679

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00868679

Key words

Navigation