Fatigue and fitness modelled from the effects of training on performance

  • Thierry Busso
  • Robin Candau
  • Jean-René Lacour


The purpose of this study was to compare two ways of estimating both fatigue and fitness indicators from systems model of the effects of training on performance. The model was applied to data concerning the training of a hammer thrower. The variations in performance were mathematically related to the successive amounts of training. The model equation was composed of negative (NF) and positive (PF) functions. The NF and PF were associated with the fatigue and fitness estimated in previous studies. Using another method, fatigue and fitness indicators were estimated from a combination of NF and PF. The influence of training on performance was negatively associated with fatigue (NI), and positively to fitness (PI). The changes in performance were well described by the model in the present study (r = 0.96,N = 19,P<0.001). Significant correlations were observed between NF and NI (r = 0.93,P < 0.001) on the one hand and between PF and PI (r = 0.90,P < 0.001) on the other. The absolute values and the time variations of PI and NI were closer to the change in performance than NF and PF. The NF and PF were accounted for mainly by the accumulation of amounts of training. On the other hand, NI and PI were accounted for rather by the impact of these amounts of training on performance.

Key words

Modelling Systems theory Physical training Hammer throwing 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Banister EW (1991) Modeling elite athletic performance. In: Physiological testing of elite athletes (Green HJ, McDougal JD, Wenger H, eds) Human Kinetics, Campaign Ill., pp 403–424Google Scholar
  2. Banister EW, Hamilton CL (1985) Variations in iron status with fatigue modelled from training in female distance runners. Eur J Appl Physiol 54:16–23Google Scholar
  3. Banister EW, Calvert TW, Savage MV, Bach T (1975) A systems model of training for athletic performance. Aust J Sports Med 7:57–61Google Scholar
  4. Busso T, Hakkinen K, Pakarinen A, Carasso C, Lacour JR, Komi PV, Kauhanen H (1990) A systems model of training responses and its relationships to hormonal responses in elite weight-lifters. Eur J Appl Physiol 61:48–54Google Scholar
  5. Busso T, Carasso C, Lacour JR (1991) Adequacy of a systems model in the modeling of training effects on performance. J Appl Physiol 71:2044–2049PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Busso T, Hakkinen K, Pakarinen A, Kauhanen H, Komi PV, Lacour JR (1992) Hormonal adaptations and modelled responses in elite weightlifters during 6 weeks of training. Eur J Appl Physiol 64:381–386Google Scholar
  7. Calvert TW, Banister EW, Savage MV, Bach T (1976) A systems model of the effects of training on physical performance. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 6:94–102Google Scholar
  8. Fitz-Clarke JR, Morton RH, Banister EW (1991) Optimizing athletic performance by influence curves. J Appl Physiol 71:1151–1158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Morton RH (1991) The quantitative periodization of athletic training: a model study. Sports Med Training Rehabil 3:19–28Google Scholar
  10. Morton RH, Fitz-Clarke JR, Banister EW (1990) Modeling human performance in running. J Appl Physiol 69:1171–1177PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Viru A (1984) The mechanism of training effects: a hypothesis. Int J Sports Med 5:219–227PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thierry Busso
    • 1
  • Robin Candau
    • 1
  • Jean-René Lacour
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculté de Médecine Saint-EtienneLaboratoire de Physiologie- GIP ExerciceFrance
  2. 2.Faculté de Médecine Lyon-SudLaboratoire de Physiologie- GIP ExerciceFrance

Personalised recommendations