Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The contribution of morphology to word recognition

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Evidence of morphological processing was investigated in three word recognition tasks. In the first study, phonological ambiguity of the base morpheme in morphologically complex words of Serbo-Croatian was exploited in order to evaluate the claim that the base morpheme serves as the unit by which entries in the lexicon are accessed. An interaction of base morpheme ambiguity and affix characteristics was obtained and this outcome was interpreted as evidence that all morphological constituents of a word participate in lexical access. In the second study, facilitation due to morphological relatedness of prime and target was observed with Serbo-Croatian materials in the lexical decision and naming versions of the repetition priming task and results were interpreted as evidence of a morphological principle of organization among wholeword forms in the lexicon. In the third study, morphological affixes of both English and Serbo-Croatian words were segmented from a source word and affixed to a target word more rapidly than phonemically matched controls. Results suggest that the morphological constituents of complex words are available in some word recognition tasks and that morphological knowledge is represented in the speaker's lexicon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, S. R. (1982). Where's morphology?Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 571–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badecker, W. T., & Caramazza, A. (1989). A lexical distinction between inflection and derivation.Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 106–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badecker, W., Hillis, A., & Caramazza, A. (1990). Lexical morphology and its role in the writing process: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia.Cognition, 35, 205–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decision a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1985). The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production?Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentin, S., & Feldman, L. B. (1990). Facilitation due to morphological and semantic relatedness at long and short lags: Evidence from Hebrew.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A, 693–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, J. I. (1985).Morphology. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology.Cognition, 28, 287–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, P., Beauvillian, C., & Segui, J. (1989). On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: A differential frequency effect.Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A. (1980). Errors of stress and intonation. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.),Errors in linguistic performance (pp. 67–80). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dannenbring, G. L., & Briand, K. (1982). Semantic priming and the word repetition effect in a lexical decision task.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 435–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell, G. S. (1987). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.Psychological Review, 93, 285–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, L. B. (1991). Morphological relationships revealed through the repetition priming task. In M. Noonan, P. Downing, & S. Lima (Eds.),Literacy and Linguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, L. B., & Fowler, C. A. (1987a). The inflected noun system in Serbo-Croatian: Lexical representation of morphological structure.Memory & Cognition, 15, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, L. B., & Fowler, C. A. (1987b). Morphemic segments shift faster than nonmorphemic controls. Paper presented to the Psychonomic Society, Seattle, WA.

  • Feldman, L. B., Kostić, A., Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1983). An evaluation of the “Basic Orthographic Syllabic Structure” in a phonologically shallow orthography.Psychological Research, 45, 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, L. B., & Moskovljević, J. (1987). Repetition priming is not purely episodic in origin.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 13, 573–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, L. B., & Turvey, M. T. (1983). Visual word recognition in Serbo-Croatian is phonologically analytic.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 288–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, C. A., Napps, S. E., & Feldman, L. B. (1985). Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming.Memory & Cognition, 13, 241–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromkin, V. A. (1973).Speech errors as linguistic evidence. Mouton:The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word comparison and orthographic depth: A multilingual comparison.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, M. F. (1980). A perspective on research in language production. In E. C. Mehler, T. Walker, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.),Perspectives on mental representation (pp. 179–220). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, M. F. (1982). Production of speech. Observations from normal and pathological language use. In A. Ellis (Ed.),Normality and pathology in cognitive functions (pp. 19–76). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, V. L., & Feldman, L. B. (1989). Language specificity in lexical organization: Evidence from deaf signers' lexical organization of ASL and English.Memory & Cognition, 17, 292–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, V. L., & Wilkenfeld, D. (1985). Morphophonology and lexical organization in deaf readers.Language and Speech, 28, 269–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, L., Wallis, J., & Knight, D. (1984). Morphemic structure and lexical access. In H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvella, R. J., Rob, R., Sandström, G., & Schreuder, R. (1987). Morphological constraints on word recognition. In A. Allport, D. Mackay, W. Prinz, & E. Scheerer (Eds.),Language production and percep tion: Relations between speaking, listening, reading and writing. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L., & Feldman, L. B. (1983). Relation between pronunciation and recognition of printed words in deep and shallow orthographies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 9, 157–1661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L., Rexer, K., & Lukatela, G. (1991). The processing of inflected words.Psychological Research, 53, 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostić, A. (1991). Informational approach to the processing of inflected morphology: Standard data reconsidered.Psychological Research, 53, 62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudanna, A., Badecker, W., & Caramazza, A. (1989). Priming homographic stems.Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 531–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukatela, G., Popadić, D., Ognjenović, P., & Turvey, M. T. (1980). Lexical decision in a phonologically shallow orthography.Memory & Cognition, 8, 124–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukatela, G., Feldman, L. B., Turvey, M. T., Carello, C., & Katz, L. (1989a). Context effects in bi-alphabetical word perception.Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 214–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukatela, G., Turvey, M. T., Feldman, L. B., Carello, C., & Katz, L. (1989b). Alphabetic priming in bi-alphabetical word perception.Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 237–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Ruddy, M. G. (1975). Loci of contextual effects on visual word-recognition. In P. M. A. Rabbitt (Ed.),Attention and performance V (pp. 98–118). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, A., & Caramazza, A. (1988). Dissociation of inflectional and derivational processes.Brain & Language, 35, 24–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monsell, S., Doyle, M. C., & Haggard, P. N. (1989). Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 43–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napps, S. E., & Fowler, C. A. (1987). Formal relationships among words and the organization of the mental lexicon.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 16, 257–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paap, K. R., McDonald, J. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Noel, R. W. (1987). Frequency and pronounceability in visually presented naming and lexical decision tasks. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and Performance XII (pp. 221–243). Hove: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanners, R. F., Neiser, J. J., Hereon, W. P., & Hall, R. (1979). Memory representation for morphologically related words.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 399–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stemberger, J. P. (1985). An interactive activation model of language production.Progress in the Psychology of Language (Vol. 1, pp. 143–186). London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M. (1987). Morphographic Processing: The BOSS Re-emerges. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and Performance XII: (pp. 265–280). Hove: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M. (1979a). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect.Memory & Cognition, 7, 263–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M. (1979b). Lexical access via an orthographic code: The Basic Orthographic Syllable Structure (BOSS).Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, M. T., Feldman, L. B., & Lukatela, G. (1984). The SerboCroatian orthography constrains the reader to a phonologically analytic strategy. In L. Henderson (Ed.),Orthographies and Reading (pp. 81–90). London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, A., & Nagy, W. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology.Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 649–667.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State University of New York at Albany, 12222, NY, USA

    Laurie Beth Feldman

  2. Haskins Laboratories, 270 Crown Street, 06511-6695, New Haven, CT, USA

    Laurie Beth Feldman

Authors
  1. Laurie Beth Feldman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feldman, L.B. The contribution of morphology to word recognition. Psychol. Res 53, 33–41 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00867330

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00867330

Keywords

Search

Navigation