Summary
Is an inflected word identified by first decomposing it into stem plus suffix or, instead, is it recognized as a whole? Several lexical decision experiments studied the recognition of inflected words in English (a language with few inflections) and Serbo-Croatian (a heavily inflected language). If recognition depended on decomposition, preceding the inflection with a brief exposure of the stem (<100 ms) should have primed the lexical entry for the stem and, therefore, facilitated recognition of the whole inflected word that followed. It did not. It was also found that the speed of recognizing an inflected word was more strongly associated with the frequency of the whole inflected form than with the frequency of its stem. The results suggested that in word recognition, lexical contact is first made with the whole word form. Nevertheless, morphological decomposition may still occur in subsequent processing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bybee, J. H. (1985).Morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology.Cognition, 28, 297–332.
Feldman, L. (1991). The contribution of morphology to word recognition.Psychological Research, 53, 33–41.
Forster, K. I. (1976). Acessesing the mental lexicon. In R. J. Wales & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.),New approaches to language mechanisms (pp. 27–85). Amsterdam: North Holland.
Fowler, C., Napps, S., & Feldman, L. (1985). Lexical entries are shared by regular and irregular, morphemically related words.Memory & Cognition, 13, 241–255.
Greenberg, J. (1966). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J. Greenberg (Ed.),Universals of human language (pp. 73–113). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Greenberg, J. (1978). Gender markers. In J. Greenberg (Ed.),Universals of human language, 3 (pp. 49–81). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kostić, A. (1991). Informational approach to processing of inflected morphology: Standard data reconsidered.Psychological Research, 53, 62–70.
Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence: Brown University Press.
Lukatela, G., Gligorijevic, B., Kostic, A., & Turvic, M. T. (1980). Representation of inflected nouns in the internal lexicon.Memory & Cognition, 8, 415–423.
Macaruso, P. (1988). Lexical organization of inflected words. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Macaruso, P., & Katz, L. (1986). Decomposition of verb stem and inflection. Paper presented to Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.
Murrell, G. A., & Morton, J. (1974). Word recognition and morphemic structure.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 963–968.
Nagy, W., Anderson, R. C., Schommer, M., Scott, J. A., & Stallman, A. C. (1989). Morphological families in the internal lexicon.Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 262–282.
Napps, S. (1989). Morphemic relationships in the lexicon: Are they distinct from semantic and formal relationshipd?Memory & Cognition, 17, 729–739.
Sánchez-Casas, R. M., Garcia-Albea, J. E., & Bradley, D. (1991). On acess representation in visual work recognition: The temporal separation technique.Psychological Research, 53, 53–61.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Katz, L., Rexer, K. & Lukatela, G. The processing of inflected words. Psychol. Res 53, 25–32 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00867329
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00867329