Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 14, Issue 6, pp 581–592

Cynical hostility, attempts to exert social control, and cardiovascular reactivity in married couples

  • Timothy W. Smith
  • Peter C. Brown


Chronically hostile persons may be at greater risk of cardiovascular illness, perhaps because of their more pronounced physiologic responses to interpersonal stressors. The present study of married couples examined the association between Cook and Medley Hostility (Ho) Scale scores and cardiovascular reactivity while couples were engaged in a discussion task with or without an incentive to exert control over their partner. Cynical hostility was associated with greater heart rate (HR) reactivity among husbands in both conditions and with greater systolic blood pressure (SBP) reactivity among husbands attempting to influence their wives. Further, husbands' cynical hostility was associated with greater SBP reactivity in their wives. Wives' cynical hostility was unrelated to their own or their husbands' reactivity. These results underscore the importance of social contexts in the association between hostility and psychophysiologic processes and suggest that the motive to exert social control may be important for hostile persons.

Key words

hostility cardiovascular reactivity cynicism blood pressure 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allred, K. D., and Smith, T. W. (1991). Social cognition in cynical hostility.Cognitive Therapy and Research 15: 399–412.Google Scholar
  2. Averill, J. R. (1982).Anger and Aggression: An Essay on Emotion, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Barefoot, J. C., Dahlstrom, W. G., and Williams, R. B., Jr. (1983). Hostility, CHD incidence, and total mortality: A 25-year follow-up of 255 physicians.Psychosom. Med. 45: 59–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barefoot, J. C., Siegler, I. C., Nowlin, J. B., Peterson, B., Haney, T. L., and Williams, R. B., Jr. (1987). Suspiciousness, health, and mortality: A follow-up study of 500 older adults.Psychosom. Med. 49: 450–457.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Barefoot, J. C., Dodge, K. A., Peterson, B. L., Dahlstrom, W. G., and Williams, R. B., Jr. (1989). The Cook-Medley Hostility Scale: Item content and ability to predict survival.Psychosom. Med. 51: 46–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Barefoot, J. C., Peterson, B. L., Dahlstrom, W. G., Siegler, I. C., Anderson, N. B., and Williams, R. B., Jr. (1991). Hostility patterns and health implications: Correlates of Cook-Medley scores in a National Survey.Health Psychol. 10: 18–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Benjamin, L. (1967). Facts and artifacts in using analysis of covariance to “undo” the law of initial values.Psychophysiology 4: 187–206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Blumenthal, J. A., Barefoot, J., Burg, M. M., and Williams, R. B., Jr. (1987). Psychological correlates of hostility among patients undergoing coronary angiography.Br. J. Med. Psychol. 60: 349–355.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, P. C., and Smith, T. W. (1992). Social influence, marriage, and the heart: Cardiovascular consequences of interpersonal control in husbands and wives Health Psychol (in press).Google Scholar
  10. Cook, W. W., and Medley, D. M. (1954). Proposed hostility and pharisaic-virtue scales for the MMPI.J. Appl. Psychol. 38: 4–418.Google Scholar
  11. Costa, P. T., Jr., Zonderman, A. B., McCrae, R. R., and Williams, R. B., Jr. (1986). Cynicism and paranoid alienation in the Cook and Medley Ho Scale.Psychosom. Med. 48: 283–285.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dembroski, T. M., and Williams, R. B., Jr. (1989). Definition and assessment of coronary-prone behavior. In Schneiderman, N., Weiss, S. M., and Kaufman, P. G. (eds.),Handbook of Research Methods in Cardiovascular Behavioral Medicine, Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Dembroski, T. M., MacDougall, J. M., Costa, P. T., and Crandits, G. A. (1989). Components of hostility as predictors of sudden death and myocardial infarction in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.Psychosom. Med. 51: 514–522.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Friedman, H. S., and Booth-Kewley, S. (1987). Personality, Type A behavior, and coronary heart disease: The role of emotional expression.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 53: 783–792.Google Scholar
  15. Hardy, J. D., and Smith, T. W. (1988). Cynical hostility and vulnerability to disease: Social support, life stress, and physiological response to conflict.Health Psychol. 7: 447–459.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hearn, M. D., Murray, D. M., and Luepker, R. V. (1989). Hostility, coronary heart disease, and total mortality: A 33-year follow-up study of university students.J. Behav. Med. 12: 105–121.Google Scholar
  17. Hecker, M. H. L., Chesney, M. A., Black, G. W., and Frautschi, N. (1989). Coronary-prone behaviors in the Western Collaborative Group Study.Psychosom. Med. 51: 153–164.Google Scholar
  18. Houston, B. K., and Kelley, K. E. (1989). Hostility in employed women: Relation to work and marital experiences, social support, stress, and anger expression.Personal Soc. Psychol. Bull. 15: 175–182.Google Scholar
  19. Joesoef, M. R., Wetterhall, S. F., DeStefano, F., Stroup, N. E., and Fronek, A. (1989). The association of peripheral arterial disease with hostility in a young, healthy veteran population.Psychosom. Med. 51: 285–289.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Klein, H. M., and Willerman, L. (1979). Psychological masculinity and femininity and typical and maximal dominance expression in women.J. Personal Soc. Psychol. 37: 2059–2070.Google Scholar
  21. Koskenvuo, M., Kapiro, J., Rose, R. J., Kesaniemi, A., Sarna, S., Heikkila, K., and Langinvainio, H. (1988). Hostility as a risk factor for mortality and ischemic heart disease in men.Psychosom. Med. 50: 330–340.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Leon, G. R., Finn, S. E., Murray, D., and Bailey, J. M. (1988). The inability to predict cardiovascular disease from hostility scores or MMPI items related to Type A behavior.J. Consul. Clin. Psychol. 56: 597–600.Google Scholar
  23. Levenson, R. W., and Gottman, J. M. (1983). Marital interaction: Physiological linkage and affective exchange.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 45: 587–597.Google Scholar
  24. Levenson, R. W., and Gottman, J. M. (1985). Physiological and affective predictors of change in relationship satisfaction.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 49: 85–94.Google Scholar
  25. Manuck, S. B., Morrison, R. L., Bellack, A. S., and Polefrone, J. M. (1985). Behavioral factors in hypertension: Cardiovascular responsibility, anger, and social competence. In Chesney, M. A., and Rosenman, R. H. (eds.),Anger and Hostility in Cardiovascular and Behavioral Disorders, Hemisphere, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Matthews, K. A. (1988). CHD and Type A behaviors: Update on and alternative to the Booth-Kewley and Friedman quantitative review.Psychol. Bull. 104: 373–380.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. McCranie, E. W., Watkin, L. O., Brandsma, J. M., and Sisson, B. D. (1986). Hostility, coronary heart disease (CHD) incidence, and total mortality: Lack of association in a 25-year follow-study of 478 physicians.J. Behav. Med. 9: 119–125.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ostfield, A. M., Lebovitis, B. Z., Shekelle, R. B., and Paul, O. (1964). A prospective study of the relationship between personality and coronary heart disease.J. Chron. Dis. 17: 266–276.Google Scholar
  29. Pickering, T. G. (1985). Should studies of patients and undergoing coronary angiography be used to evaluate the role of behavioral risk factors for coronary heart disease?J. Behav. Med. 8: 203–213.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Pope, M. K., Smith, T. W., and Rhodewalt, F. (1990). Cognitive, behavioral, and affective correlates of the Cook and Medley Hostility Scale.J. Personal. Assess. 54: 501–514.Google Scholar
  31. Sallis, J. F., Johnson, C. C., Trevorrow, T. R., Kaplan, R. M., and Hovell, M. F. (1987). The relationship between cynical hostility and blood pressure reactivity.J. Psychosom. Res. 31: 111–116.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Seeman, T. W., and Syme, S. L. (1987). Social networks and coronary artery disease: A comparison of the structure and function of social relations as predictors of disease.Psychosom. Med. 49: 3451–354.Google Scholar
  33. Shekelle, R. B., Gale, M., Ostfeld, A. M., and Paul, O. (1983). Hostility, risk of coronary heart disease, and mortality.Psychosom. Med. 45: 109–114.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Siegman, A. W. (1990). Components of hostility and cardiovascular reactivity. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association annual meeting. Boston.Google Scholar
  35. Siegman, A. W., Dembroski, T. M., and Ringel, N. (1987). Components of hostility and the severity of coronary artery disease.Psychosom. Med. 49: 127–135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith, M. A., and Houston, B. K. (1987). Hostility, anger, expression, cardiovascular responsibility, and social support.Biol. Psychol. 24: 39–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith, T. W., and Allred, K. D. (1989). Blood pressure responses during social interaction in high- and low-cynically hostile males.J. Behav. Med. 12: 135–143.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith, T. W., and Frohm, K. D. (1985). What's so unhealthy about hostility? Construct validity and psychosocial correlates of the Cook and Medley Ho scale.Health Psychol. 4: 503–520.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith, T. W., and Pope, M. K. (1990). Cynical hostility as a health risk: Current status and future directions.J. Soc. Behav. Personal. 5: 77–88.Google Scholar
  40. Smith, T. W., Pope, M. K., Sanders, J. D., Allred, K. D., and O'Keeffe, J. L. (1988). Cynical hostility at home and work: Psychosocial vulnerability across domains.J. Res. Personal. 22: 525–548.Google Scholar
  41. Smith, T. W., Allred, K. D., Morrison, C. A., and Carlson, S. D. (1989). Cardiovascular reactivity and interpersonal influence: Active coping in a social context.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 56: 209–218.Google Scholar
  42. Smith, T. W., Sanders, J. D., and Alexander, J. F. (1990a). What does the Cook and Medley Hostility Scale measure? Affect, behavior and attributions in the marital context.J. Personal Soc. Psychol. 58: 699–708.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, T. W., Baldwin, M., and Christensen, A. (1990b). Interpersonal influence as active coping: Effects of task difficulty on cardiovascular reactivity.Psychophysiology 27: 429–437.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Suarez, E. C., and Williams, R. B., Jr. (1989). Situational determinants of cardiovascular and emotional reactivity in high and low hostile men.Psychosom. Med. 51: 404–418.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Suarez, E. C., Williams, R. B., Jr., Harlan, E. S., and Peoples, M. C. (1990). The relation of hostility and harassment to cardiovascular responses in young women. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Behavioral Medicine, Chicago.Google Scholar
  46. Weidner, G., Friend, R., Ficarrotto, T. J., and Mendell, N. R. (1989). Hostility and cardiovascular reactivity to stress in women and men.Psychosom. Med. 51: 36–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy W. Smith
    • 1
  • Peter C. Brown
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of UtahSalt Lake City

Personalised recommendations