Advertisement

Journal of Geodesy

, Volume 70, Issue 11, pp 731–739 | Cite as

Multiresolution approximation of the gravity field

  • Zuofa Li
Article
  • 79 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, the idea of multiresolution approximation to the gravity field of the Earth is introduced, and a new approach is developed based on wavelet theory. In this approach, the modelling of the gravity field is done based on all available data with different resolutions, while a discrete wavelet transform is utilized as a bridge, effectively linking different resolution levels. The main advantage of this approach is that it allows us to consider not only optimal estimation of gravity field signals at multiple resolutions but also the fusion of measurements at multiple resolutions. Numerical results with simulated data show the applicability of the proposed approach in physical geodesy.

Keywords

Simulated Data Gravity Field Discrete Wavelet Optimal Estimation Resolution Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beylkin, G., Coifman, R. and Rokhlin, V. (1991) Fast Wavelet Transforms and Numerical Algorithms I, Communication on Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol XLIV, pp.141–183.Google Scholar
  2. Barthelmes, F., Ballani, L. and Klees, R. (1994) On the Application of Wavelets in Geodesy, In: Sanso, F.(ed), Proceedings of III Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy, Springer-Verlag, pp. 394 – 403.Google Scholar
  3. Benciolini, B. (1994) A Note on Some Possible Geodetic Applications of Wavelets, Section IV Bulletin, International Association of Geodesy, pp. 17 – 21.Google Scholar
  4. Blais, J.A.R. (1993) Analysis of Inverse Convolution Problems in Geomatics with Some Practical Consideration, Paper presented at the Canadian Geophysical Annual Conference, Banff, Canada, May, 1993.Google Scholar
  5. Blais, J.A.R. (1995) Multiresolution Analysis of Geodetic Convolution Problems, Paper presented at XXI IUGG General Assembly, Boulder, Colorado, July 2 –14, 1995.Google Scholar
  6. Collin, F., and Warnant, R.(1995) Application of the Wavelet Transform for GPS Cycle Slip Detection and Comparison with Kalman filter, Manuscripta Geodaetica 20: 161 -172.Google Scholar
  7. Colombo, J. (1991) The Role of GPS/INS Integration in Mapping the Earth's Gravity Field in 1990's, In:.Schwarz, K.P. and Lachapelle, G.(Eds), Proceedings of the IAG International symposium 107 -KIS1990 pp. 463–475.Google Scholar
  8. Daubechies, I.(1988) Orthonormal Bases for Compactly Supported Wavelets, Communication on Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. XLI-7, pp. 507–537.Google Scholar
  9. Daubechies, I. (1992) Ten Lectures on Wavelets, CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics 61, SIAM, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  10. Freeden, W.(1993) Wavelet — methods for Resolution of Boundary Value Problem, Paper presented at Symposium on Mathematical and Physical Foundations of Geodesy, Stuttgart, 7–9 September.Google Scholar
  11. Grossman, A. and Morlet, J. (1984) Decomposition of Hardy Function into Square Integral Wavelets of Constant Shape, SIAM J. Math.Anal., 15, pp.723–736.Google Scholar
  12. Heiskanen, W.A. and Moritz, H. (1967) Physical Geodesy, W.H.Freeman, San Fransisco.Google Scholar
  13. Keller, W. (1995) Harmonic Downward Continuation Using a Haar Wavelet Frame, In: Schwarz, K.P. (ed), Proceedings of the IAG Symposium on Airborne Gravity Field Determination, pp.81–87.Google Scholar
  14. Klees, R. (1994) Summary of the subcommission 2 session, Section IV Bulletin, International Association of Geodesy, pp. 37 – 41.Google Scholar
  15. Klees, R.(1995) Gravity Field and Advanced Integral Methods, Paper presented at XXI IUGG General Assembly, Boulder, Colorado, July 2 –14, 1995.Google Scholar
  16. Mallat, S. G.(1989a) A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation, IEEE Trans. PAMI, 11, pp.674–693.Google Scholar
  17. Mallat, S.G. (1989b) Multiresolution Approximation and Wavelet Orthonormal Bases of L2, Trans. Amer, Math.Soc. Vol. 3 –15, pp.69–88.Google Scholar
  18. Meyer, Y. (1992) Wavelets and Operators, Cambridge studies in advanced mathematics 37, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Moritz, H. (1980) Advanced Physical Geodesy, Herbert Wichmann Verlag, Karlsruhe, Abacus Press, Tunbridge Wells, Kent.Google Scholar
  20. Strange, G. (1989) Wavelets and Dilation Equations: A Brief Introduction, SIAM Review, Vol.31, No.4, pp.614–627.Google Scholar
  21. Vetterli, M. and Herley, C. (1992) Wavelet and Filter Banks: Theory and Design, IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, Vol.40, No.9, pp.2207–2233.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zuofa Li
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Geomatics EngineeringThe University of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations