Summary
Gypsum blocks proved to be a valuable tool for practical field research of crop water balances during the summer half year in a semihumid environment. Information on blocktype, calibration and compensation of temperature effects are given and the suitability of the gypsum block method is discussed using several examples of measured soil water tensions and soil water contents below different crops and bare soil. The main advantage of the gypsum block method is that they are suitable for monitoring soil water status below crops and plant communities continuously. After installation the nylon-impregnated blocks can be left in place for years and measurements may be taken from outside the crop stand thus avoiding any disturbances of the plants environment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Campbell, G. S., Gee, G. W., 1986: Water potential: miscellaneous methods. In: Klute, A. (ed.)Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I. Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd edn. Agronomy 9, Am. Soc. Agron. Madison, USA.
Goltz, S. M., Benoit, G., Schimmelpfenning, H., 1981: New circuitry for measuring soil water matric potential with moisture blocks.Agric. Meteorol. 24, 75–82.
Long, I. F., French, B. K., 1967: Measurement of soil moisture in the field by neutron moderation.J. Soil Sci. 18, 149–166.
Pogue, W. R., 1990: Watermark soil moisture sensor — an update. ASAE paper 90-2582, ASAE, St. Joseph, MI.
Stenitzer, E., 1990: Monitoring soil water extraction pattern in the root zone with a battery powered data logger using gypsum blocks.Acta Horticulturae 278, 407–415.
Stewart, B. A., Nielsen, D. R., 1990: Irrigation of agricultural crops. Agronomy Series No. 30. Madison, USA.
WMO, 1968: Practical soil moisture problems in agriculture. Technical note No. 97, Geneva — Switzerland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
With 7 Figures
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stenitzer, E. Monitoring soil moisture regimes of field crops with gypsum blocks. Theor Appl Climatol 48, 159–165 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00864922
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00864922