Abstract
The correct use of ellipsoidal coordinates and related ellipsoidal harmonic functions can provide a representation of linearized Geodetic Boundary Value Problems (GBVP) much closer to the exact ones than what is usually done in spherical approximation: this becomes important in the present age, since terms of the type e2N, possibly amounting to several dozens of centimetres, are nowadays observable.
Although the theory of ellipsoidal harmonics has been introduced into geodesy by several authors to treat gravity global models, the numerical computation of ellipsoidal harmonics of high degree and order seems to be more critical than it has been recognized. In particular, exact recursive relations display a quite unstable behaviour, no matter what normalization constants are used; it is only through particular representation of hypergeometric functions that it is possible to find a sound method for numerical manipulation. Also the asymptotic approximations, exploiting the smallness of the eccentricity, e2, are analysed in relation to their critical behaviour for particular values of degree and order, it is shown that a limit layer theory can provide a simpler, better, and stable approximation of the exact values of ellipsoidal harmonics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cruz, J.Y. (1986) Ellipsoidal corrections to potential coefficients obtained from gravity anomaly data on the ellipsoid, Report N.371, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, Ohio State University.
Gleason, D.M. (1988) Comparing ellipsoidal corrections to the transformation between the geopotential's spherical and ellipsoidal spectrum, Man.Geod.N.13, pp 114–129.
Gleason, D.M. (1989) Some notes on the evaluation of ellipsoidal and spherical harmonic coefficients from surface data, Man.Geod.N.14, pp 110–116.
Heck, B. (1991) On the linearized boundary value problems of physical geodesy, Report N.407, Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, Ohio State University.
Heiskanen, W.A. and Moritz, H. (1990) Physical Geodesy, Reprint, Institute of Physical Geodesy, Technical University, Graz, Austria.
Hobson, E.W. (1965) The Theory of Spherical and Ellipsoidal Harmonics, Chelsea Publishing Company, New York.
Jekeli, C. (1988) The exact transformation between ellipsoidal and spherical harmonic expansions, Man.Geod.N.13, pp 106–113.
Moritz, H. (1980) Advanced Physical Geodesy, Herbert Wichmann Verlag Karlsruhe, Abacus Press, Tunbridge Wells Kent.
Nikiforov, A.F. and Uvarov, V.B. (1988) Special functions of mathematical physics, Birkhauser, Basel-Boston.
Rapp, H.R., and Pavlis, N.K. (1990) The Development and Analysis of Geopotential Coefficient Models to Spherical Harmonic Degree 360, Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol.95, N.B13, pp 21,885–21,911.
Sansò, F. and Sona G. (1993) The challenge of computing the geoid in the nineties, Surveys in Geophysics, Vol. 14, N.4-5, Kluwer Academic Publ., Netherlands.
Thong, N.C. (1989) Simulation of gradiometry using spheroidal harmonic model of the gravitational field, Man. Geod. N.14, pp 404–417.
Thong, N.C. and Grafarend, E.W. (1989) A spheroidal harmonic model of the terrestrial gravitational field, Man. Geod. N.14, pp 285–304.
Wunsch, C. (1993) Physics of the Ocean Circulation, in Satellite Altimetry in Geodesy and Oceanography, Lecture Notes in Earth Science N.50, R.Rummel, F.Sansò (Eds.), Springer Verlag.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sona, G. Numerical problems in the computation of ellipsoidal harmonics. Journal of Geodesy 70, 117–126 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00863423
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00863423