Skip to main content
Log in

Analytical dynamic orbit improvement for the evaluation of geodetic-geodynamic satellite data

  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Given an analytical solution (solution of the equations of motion using analytical integration techniques) an integration of the variational equations is not necessary but simply a differentiation of the analytical solution. Based on a high-precision analytical solution explicit expressions for the coefficients of the observation equations to improve state variables and force model parameters have been derived.

The definition of suitable unknowns for a pure dynamic orbital improvement can be based then on an analysis of the information content of the data at hand by using those expressions.

Regarding the Fourier series structure of orbital perturbations as well as the special properties of crossover difference data, the proposed technique is particularly favourable for an evaluation of Remote Sensing Data such as altimeter, SST and gradiometer data from satellites in repeating orbits.

After a general discussion of the observation equations for crossover data our present results using GEOSAT altimeter data are discussed as one example for applications. Some short remarks about further applications are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brouwer, D., Clemence, G. M.:Methods of Celestial Mechanics, Academic Press, New York and London, 1961

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cui, Ch.: Die Bewegung Künstlicher Satelliten im Anisotropen Gravitationsfeld einer Gleichmäßig Rotierenden Starren Modellerde,DGK ReiheC-357, 1990, München

  3. Cui, Ch., Mareyen, M.: Gauss's equation of motion in terms of Hill variables and first application to numerical integration of satellite orbits.Manuscripta Geodetica, 17:155–163, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hamming, R. W.:Numerical Methods for Scientists and Engineers. Dover Publications, New York, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  5. Moore, P., Rothwell, D.A.: A study of gravitational and non-gravitational modelling errors in crossover differences,Manuscripta Geodetica, 15:187–206, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sandwell, D.T, Milbert, D.G. and Douglas, B.C.: Global Nondynamic Orbit Improvement for Altimetric Satellites,J. Geophys. Res., 91, No. B9, 1986

  7. Schwintzer, P., Reigber, Ch., Bode, A., Kang, Z., Zhu, S. Y., Massmann, F.-H., Raimondo, J. C., Binancale, R., Balmino, G., Lemoine, J. M., Moynot, B., Morty, J. C., Borlier, F., Boudou, Y.: Improvement of Global Gravity Field Modelling for ERS-1. Proc. 2. ERS-1 Symp., Hamburg, 1993

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cui, C., Lelgemann, D. Analytical dynamic orbit improvement for the evaluation of geodetic-geodynamic satellite data. Journal of Geodesy 70, 83–97 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00863420

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00863420

Keywords

Navigation