Skip to main content
Log in

Towards disciplinary disintegration in biology

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interdisciplinary integration has fundamental limitations. This is not sufficiently realized in science and in philosophy. Concerning scientific theories there are many examples of pseudo-integration which should be unmasked by elementary philosophical analysis. For example, allegedly over-arching theories of stress which are meant to unite biology and psychology, upon analysis, turn out to represent terminological rather than substantive unity. They should be replaced by more specific, local theories. Theories of animal orientation, likewise, have been formulated in unduly general terms. A natural history approach is more suitable for the study of animal orientation. The tendency to formulate overgeneral theories is also present in evolutionary biology. Philosophy of biology can only deal with these matters if it takes a normative turn. Undue emphasis on interdisciplinary integration is a modern variant of the old unity of science ideal. The replacement of the ideal by a better one is an important challenge for the philosophy of science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold, G.P.: 1974, ‘Rheotropism in fishes’,Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 49, 515–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, W.: 1983, ‘The Evolution of our Understanding of the Cell: a Study in the Dynamics of Scientific Progress’,Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 4, 309–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, W.: 1986a, ‘Building Interlevel Theories’, in P. Weingartner and G. Dorn (eds.),Foundations of Biology, Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, pp. 65–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, W.: 1986b, ‘The Nature of Scientific Integration’, in W. Bechtel (ed.),Integrating Scientific Disciplines, Nijhoff, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, W.: this issue, ‘Integrating Sciences by Creating New Disciplines: the Case of Cell Biology’.

  • Brandon, R.: 1990,Adaptation and the Environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burian, R.: 1985, ‘On Conceptual Change in Biology: The Case of the Gene’, in D. Depew and B. Weber (eds.),Evolution at a Crossroads, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass., pp. 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burian, R.: 1988, ‘Challenges to the Evolutionary Synthesis’,Evolutionary Biology 21, 247–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burian, R.: this issue, ‘Unification and Coherence as Methodological Objectives in the Biological Sciences’.

  • Byerly, H.C. and R.E. Michod: 1990, ‘Fitness and Evolutionary Explanation’,Biology and Philosophy 5, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darden, L.: 1992,Theory Change in Science: Strategies from Mendelian Genetics, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darden, L. and N. Maull: 1977, ‘Interfield Theories’,Philosophy of Science 44, 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, G.S. and D.L. Gunn: 1961,The Orientation of Animals, Dover Publications, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime, J.P.: 1979.Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, M.-W. and S.W. Fox: 1988,Evolutionary Processes and Metaphors, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L.: 1981, ‘Reduction in Genetics’,Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6, 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L.: 1988a, ‘A Mechanism and its Metaphysics: an Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science’,Biology and Philosophy 3, 123–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L., 1988b,Science as a Process, an Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P., 1989, ‘Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World’, in P. Kitcher and W.C. Salmon (eds.),Scientific Explanation, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 410–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R.S.: 1966,Psychological Stress and the Coping Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R.: 1966, ‘The Strategy of Model Building in Population Biology’,American Scientist 54, 421–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R.: 1968,Evolution in Changing Environments, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikhail, A.: 1985, ‘Stress, a Psychophysiological Conception’, in A. Monat and R.S. Lazarus (eds.),Stress and Coping, an Anthology. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 30–39 (original article 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, S. and J. Beatty: 1970, ‘The Propensity Interpretation of Fitness’,Philosophy of Science 46, 263–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V.O.: 1953,From a Logical Point of View, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V.O.: 1960,Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, K.F.: 1967, ‘Approaches to Reduction’,Philosophy of Science 34: 137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, K.F.: 1976 ‘Reduction in Biology; Prospects and Problems’, in R.S. Cohen et al. (eds.)Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 32, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 613–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, K.F.: 1980, ‘Theory Structure in the Biomedical Sciences’,Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 5: 57–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, K.F.: 1992,Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, K.F.: this issue, ‘Reduction and the Neurobiology of Mind’.

  • Selye, H.: 1983, ‘The Stress Concept: Past, Present and Future’, in C.L. Cooper (ed.),Stress Research, Issues for the Eighties, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloep, P.B. and W.J. van der Steen: 1988, ‘A Natural Alliance of Teaching and Philosophy of Science’,Educational Philosophy and Theory 20, 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1984,The Nature of Selection, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, W.J. van der: 1984, ‘Methodological Aspects of Migration and Orientation in Fishes’, in G.D. McCleave et al. (eds.),Mechanisms of Migration in Fishes, Plenum, New York, pp. 421–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, W.J. van der: 1990a, ‘Interdisciplinary Integration in Biology? An Overview’,Acta Biotheoretica 38, 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, W.J. van der: 1990b, ‘Concepts in Biology: a Survey of Practical Methodological Principles’,Journal of Theoretical Biology 143, 383–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, W.J. van der: 1993,A Practical Philosophy for the Life Sciences, SUNY Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, W.J. van der and H. Kamminga: 1991, ‘Laws and Natural History in Biology’,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42: 445–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, W.J. van der and A. ter Maat: 1979, ‘Theoretical Studies on Animal Orientation I. Methodological Aspects of Classifications’,Journal of Theoretical Biology 79: 223–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, W.J. van der and M. Scholten: 1985, ‘Methodological Problems in Evolutionary Biology. IV. Stress and Stress Tolerance, and Exercise in Definitions’,Acta Biotheroretica 34: 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, W.J. van der and P.B. Sloep: 1988, ‘Mere Generality is not Enough’,Biology and Philosophy 3, 217–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, W.J. van der and P.J. Thung: 1988,Faces of Medicine, a Philosophical Study, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Der Steen, W.J. Towards disciplinary disintegration in biology. Biol Philos 8, 259–275 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00860429

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00860429

Key words

Navigation