Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 167–195 | Cite as

Biodiversity, biological uncertainty, and setting conservation priorities

  • K. S. Shrader-Frechette
  • E. D. Mccoy
Article

Abstract

In a world of massive extinctions where not all taxa can be saved, how ought biologists to decide their preservation priorities? When biologists make recommendations regarding conservation, should their analyses be based on scientific criteria, on public or lay criteria, on economic or some other criteria? As a first step in answering this question, we examine the issue of whether biologists ought to try to save the endangered Florida panther, a well known “glamour” taxon. To evaluate the merits of panther preservation, we examine three important arguments of biologists who are skeptical about the desirability of panther preservation. These arguments are (1) that conservation dollars ought to be spent in more efficient ways than panther preservation; (2) that biologists and conservationists ought to work to preserve species before subspecies; and (3) that biologists and conservationists ought to work to save habitats before species or subspecies. We conclude that, although all three arguments are persuasive, none of them provides convincing grounds for foregoing panther preservation in favor of other, more scientifically significant conservation efforts. Our conclusion is based, in part, on the argument that biologists ought to employ ethical, as well as scientific, rationality in setting conservation priorities and that ethical rationality may provide persuasive grounds for preserving taxa that often are not viewed by biologists as of great importance.

Key words

Biodiversity conservation preservation Florida panther extinction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ballou, J.D., T.J. Foose, R.C. Lacy, and U.S. Seal: 1989,Florida Panther Population Viability Analysis and Recommendations, Captive Breeding Specialist Group, Species Survival Commission, International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Apple Valley, MN (12101 Johnny Cake Ridge Road, 55128, tel. (612) 431-9325).Google Scholar
  2. Belden, R.C.: 1987, ‘Florida Panther Recovery Plan Implementation — A 1983 Progress Report’, in S.D. Miller and D.D. Everett (eds.),Cats of the World: Biology, Conservation and Management, National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DC, pp. 159–172.Google Scholar
  3. Bolgiano, C.: 1991, ‘Concepts of Cougar’,Wilderness 54, 26–33.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, G.M., Jr.: 1990, ‘Valuation of Genetic Resources’, in G.H. Orians, G.M. Brown, Jr., W. E. Kunin, and J.E. Swierzbinski (eds.),The Preservation and Valuation of Biological Resources, University of Washington Press, Seattle and London, pp. 203–228.Google Scholar
  5. Burke, R.L., and S.R. Humphrey: 1987, ‘Rarity as a Criterion for Endangerment in Florida's Fauna’,Oryx 21, 97–102.Google Scholar
  6. Caldwell, L.K., and K.S. Shrader-Frechette: 1993,Policy for Land: Ethics and Law, Rowman and Littlefield, Savage, MD.Google Scholar
  7. Colinvaux, P.A.: 1978,Why Big Fierce Animals are Rare: an Ecologist's Perspective, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  8. Cristoffer, C., and J. Eisenberg: 1985,On the Captive Breeding and Reintroduction of the Florida Panther in Suitable Habitats, unpublished report.Google Scholar
  9. Dasgupta, P.: 1990, ‘Commentary’, in G.H. Orians, G.M. Brown Jr., W.E. Kunin, and J.E. Swierzbinski (eds.),The Preservation and Valuation of Biological Resources, University of Washington Press, Seattle and London, pp. 229–232.Google Scholar
  10. Dixon, K.R.: 1982, ‘Mountain Lion (Felis concolor)’, in J.A. Chapman and G.A. Feldhamer (eds.),Wild Mammals of North America: Biology, Management, and Economics, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, pp. 711–727.Google Scholar
  11. Duda, M.: 1987,Floridians and Wildlife, Nongame Wildlife Program Technical Report No. 2, Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission, Tallahassee, FL.Google Scholar
  12. Dworkin, R.: 1977,Taking Rights Seriously, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  13. Eisenberg, J.: 1989, ‘Statement’, in ‘Minutes’, in Ballouet al., Florida Panther Population Viability Analysis and Recommendations, Captive Breeding Specialist Group, Species Survival Commission, International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Apple Valley, MN (12101 Johnny Cake Ridge Road, 55128, tel. (612) 431-9325).Google Scholar
  14. Fernald, R.T.: 1989,Coastal Xeric Scrub Communities of the Treasure Coast Region, Florida: A Summary of Their Distribution and Ecology, with Guidelines for Their Preservation and Management, Nongame Wildlife Program Technical Report No. 6, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Tallahassee, FL.Google Scholar
  15. Fisher, J., and N. Myers: 1986, ‘What We Must Do to Save Wildlife’,International Wildlife 16, No. 3, 12–15.Google Scholar
  16. Franklin, K.: 1987, ‘Endangered Species: Where to From Here?’,American Forests 93, Nos. 11, 12, pp. 57, 58, 60, 74–76.Google Scholar
  17. Fuller, K.: 1990, ‘WWF Works to Save Asia's Large Mammals’,Focus 12, No. 1, pp. 1, 7.Google Scholar
  18. Goldman, E.A.: 1946, ‘Classification of the Races of the Puma’, in S.P. Young and E.A. Goldman (eds.),The Puma, Mysterious American Cat, National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DC, pp. 177–302.Google Scholar
  19. Goldstein, J.H.: 1990, ‘The Prospects for Using Market Incentives for Conservation of Biological Diversity’, in G.H. Orians, G.M. Brown, Jr., W.E. Kunin, and J.E. Swierzbinski (eds.),The Preservation and Valuation of Biological Resources, University of Washington Press, Seattle and London, pp. 246–265.Google Scholar
  20. Goodman, D.: 1987, ‘The Demography of Chance Extinction’, in M.E. Soulé (ed.),Viable Populations for Conservation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 11–34.Google Scholar
  21. Gould, S.J.: 1990, ‘The Golden Rule — a Proper Scale for Our Environmental Crisis’,Natural History 9, 34–90.Google Scholar
  22. Gregory, R., R. Mendelsohn, and T. Moore: 1989, ‘Measuring the Benefits of Endangered Species Preservation: From Research to Policy’,Journal of Environmental Management 29, 399–408.Google Scholar
  23. Hall, E.R.: 1981,The Mammals of North America, John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Hanemann, W.M.: 1990, ‘Commentary’, in G.H. Orians, G.M. Brown, Jr., W.E. Kunin, and J.E. Swierzbinski (eds.),The Preservation and Valuation of Biological Resources, University of Washington Press, Seattle and London, pp. 233–238.Google Scholar
  25. Hanski, I.: 1989, ‘Metapopulation Dynamics: Does It Help to Have More of the Same?’,Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4, 113–114.Google Scholar
  26. Harris, L.D., and P.B. Gallagher: 1989, ‘New Initiatives for Wildlife Conservation: The Need for Movement Corridors’, in G. MacKintosh (ed.),Preserving Communities and Corridors, Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, DC, pp. 11–34.Google Scholar
  27. Harvell, D.: 1990, ‘Summary of the Discussion’, in G.H. Orians, G.M. Brown, Jr., W.E. Kunin, and J.E. Swierzbinski (eds.),The Preservation and Valuation of Biological Resources, University of Washington Press, Seattle and London, pp. 198–202.Google Scholar
  28. Irland, L.C.: 1976, ‘Determining the Value of Forests to Communities and the General Public: The Case of Southern Bottomland Hardwoods’, in A.C. Main (ed.),25th Annual Forestry Symposium: Economics of Southern Forest Resources Management, School of Forestry and Wildlife Management, Division of Continuing Education, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, pp. 17–38.Google Scholar
  29. Johnson, R.N.: 1990, ‘Commentary’, in G.H. Orians, G.M. Brown, Jr., W.E. Kunin, and J.E. Swierzbinski (eds.),The Preservation and Valuation of Biological Resources, University of Washington Press, Seattle and London, pp. 264–268.Google Scholar
  30. Laikre, L., and N. Ryman: 1991, ‘Inbreeding Depression in a Captive Wolf (Canis lupus) Population’,Conservation Biology 5, 33–40.Google Scholar
  31. Locke, J.: 1960,Two Treatises of Government, University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  32. Maehr, D.S.: 1990, ‘The Florida Panther and Private Lands’,Conservation Biology 4, 167–170.Google Scholar
  33. Maehr, D.S., R.C. Belden, E.D. Land, and L. Wilkins: 1990, ‘Food Habits of Panthers in Southwest Florida’,Journal of Wildlife Management 54, 429–433.Google Scholar
  34. McBride, R.: 1985, ‘Population Status of the Florida Panther in the Everglades National Park and Big Cypress National Preserve’, unpublished report, Everglades National Park and Big Cypress National Preserve.Google Scholar
  35. McCoy, E.D., and H.R. Mushinsky: 1992, ‘Rarity of Organisms in the Sand Pine Scrub Habitat of Florida’,Conservation Biology, in press.Google Scholar
  36. McNab, B.K.: 1963, ‘Bioenergetics and the Determination of Home Range Size’,American Naturalist 97, 133–140.Google Scholar
  37. Miller, W.D., W.G. Van Name, and D. Quinn: 1929,A Crisis in Conservation: Serious Danger of Extinction of Many North American Birds, published by the Authors, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Noll, R.G.: 1990, ‘Commentary’, in G.H. Orians, G.M. Brown, Jr., W.E. Kunin, and J.E. Swierzbinski (eds.),The Preservation and Valuation of Biological Resources, University of Washington Press, Seattle and London, pp. 269–275.Google Scholar
  39. Norton, B.G.: 1988, ‘Avoiding the Triage Question’,Endangered Species Update 5, 1–4.Google Scholar
  40. Noss, R.F., and L.D. Harris: 1986, ‘Nodes, Networks, and MUMs: Preserving Diversity at All Scales’,Environmental Management 10, 299–309.Google Scholar
  41. Noss, R.F.: 1987, ‘Corridors in Real Landscapes: A Reply to Simberloff and Cox’,Conservation Biology 1, 159–164.Google Scholar
  42. O'Brien, S.J., M.E. Roelke, L. Marker, A. Newman, C.A. Winkler, D. Meltzer, L. Colly, J.F. Evermann, M. Bush, and D.E. Wildt: 1985, ‘Genetic Basis for Species Vulnerability in the Cheetah’,Science 227, 1428–1434.Google Scholar
  43. Orians, G.H., G.M. Brown, Jr., W.E. Kunin, and J.E. Swierzbinski (eds.): 1990,The Preservation and Valuation of Biological Resources, University of Washington Press, Seattle and London.Google Scholar
  44. Rabinowitz, D., S. Cairns, and T. Dillon: 1986, ‘Seven Forms of Rarity and Their Frequency in the Flora of the British Isles’, in M.E. Soulé (ed.),Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 182–204.Google Scholar
  45. Raloff, J.: 1989, ‘Endangered Species Need More Help’,Science News 135, No. 5, 79.Google Scholar
  46. Regan, T.: 1983,The Care for Animal Rights, University of California Press, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  47. Roelke, M.E., E.R. Jacobsen, G.V. Kollias, and J. Forrester: 1985,Medical Management and Biomedical Findings on the Florida Panther, Felis concolor coryi, July 1, 1983 to June 30, 1985, Appendix 1, Panther Health and Reproduction, Annual Performance Report E1–9, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Tallahassee, FL.Google Scholar
  48. Ryan, J.C.: 1992, ‘Conserving Biological Diversity’, in L.R. Brownet al., State of the World 1992, W.W. Norton, New York, pp. 9–26.Google Scholar
  49. Shackle, G.L.S.: 1972,Epistemics and Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  50. Shrader-Frechette, K.S.: 1985,Risk Analysis and Scientific Method, Reidel, Boston.Google Scholar
  51. Shrader-Frechette, K.S.: 1991,Risk and Rationality, Berkeley, University of California Press.Google Scholar
  52. Shrader-Frechette, K.S., and E.D. McCoy: 1993,Method in Ecology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  53. Simberloff, D.: 1986, Island Biogeographic Theory and Integrated Pest Management’, in M. Cogan (ed.),Ecological Theory and Integrated Pest Management Practice, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 19–35.Google Scholar
  54. Simberloff, D.: 1987, ‘Simplification, Danger, and Ethics in Conservation Biology’,Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 68, 156–157.Google Scholar
  55. Simberloff, D., and J. Cox: 1987, ‘Consequences and Costs of Conservation Corridors,’ Conservation Biology1, 63–71.Google Scholar
  56. Simberloff, D., J.A. Farr, J. Cox, and D.W. Mehlmann: 1992, ‘Movement Corridors: Conservation Bargains or Expensive Snake Oil?’,Conservation Biology, in press.Google Scholar
  57. Soulé, M.E.: 1986, ‘Conservation Biology and the ‘Real World’’, in M.E. Soulé (ed.),Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
  58. Soulé, M.E.: 1989, ‘Conservation Biology in the Twenty-First Century: Summary and Outlook’, in D. Western and M.C. Pearl (eds.),Conservation for the Twenty-First Century, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 297–303.Google Scholar
  59. Soulé, M.E., and K.A. Kohm (eds.): 1989,Research Priorities for Conservation Biology, Island Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  60. Strang, W.J.: 1990, ‘Summary of the Discussion’, in G.H. Orians, G.M. Brown, Jr., W.E. Kunin, and J.E. Swierzbinski (eds.),The Preservation and Valuation of Biological Resources, University of Washington Press, Seattle and London, pp. 240–245.Google Scholar
  61. Taylor, P.W.: 1986,Respect for Nature, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  62. US Fish and Wildlife Service: 1986,Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants, 50 CFR 17.11 and 17.12, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  63. US Fish and Wildlife Service: 1987,Florida Panther (Felis concolor coryi) Recovery Plan, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  64. Vining, J. (ed.): 1990,Social Science and Natural Resource Recreation Management, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  65. Wayne, R.K.,et al.: 1991, ‘Conservation Genetics of the Endangered Isle Royale Gray Wolf’,Conservation Biology 5, 41–51.Google Scholar
  66. Western, D.: 1989, ‘Conservation Biology’, in D. Western and M.C. Pearl (eds.),Conservation for the Twenth-First Century, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 31–36.Google Scholar
  67. Wildt, D.E., J.G. Howard, L.L. Hall, and M. Bush: 1987, ‘The Reproductive Physiology of the Clouded Leopard [Neotelis nebulosa]: I. Electroejaculates contain high proportions of pleiomorphic spermatozoa throughout the year’,Biology of Reproduction 34, 937–948.Google Scholar
  68. Wilson, E.O. (ed.): 1988,Biodiversity, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  69. Wood, D.A.: 1991,Official List of Endangered and Potentially Endangered Fauna and Flora in Florida, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Tallahassee, FL.Google Scholar
  70. Woodruff, O.S.: 1989, ‘The Problems of Conserving Genes and Species’, in D. Western and M.C. Pearl (eds.),Conservation for the Twenty-First Century, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 76–88.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. S. Shrader-Frechette
    • 1
  • E. D. Mccoy
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of South FloridaTampa
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of South FloridaTampa

Personalised recommendations