Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 359–384 | Cite as

The competition controversy in community ecology

  • Gregory Cooper


There is a long history of controversy in ecology over the role of competition in determining patterns of distribution and abundance, and over the significance of the mathematical modeling of competitive interactions. This paper examines the controversy. Three kinds of considerations have been involved at one time or another during the history of this debate. There has been dispute about the kinds of regularities ecologists can expect to find, about the significance of evolutionary considerations for ecological inquiry, and about the empirical credentials of theoretical studies of competition. Each of these elements is examined with an eye toward gaining philosophical clarification of the issues involved. In the process, certain shortcomings of contemporary philosophical theories are revealed. In particular, I argue that plausibility arguments based on background considerations are an important part of the model building tradition, but that current accounts of the structure and evaluation of scientific theories do little to illuminate this side of theoretical ecology.

Key words

Ecology evolution competition theory testing modeling 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abrams, P.A.: 1975, ‘Limiting Similarity and the Form of the Competition Coefficient’,Theoretical Population Biology 8, 356–375.Google Scholar
  2. Abrams, P.A.: 1980, ‘Are Competition Coefficients Constant? Inductive yersus Deductive Approaches’,American Naturalist 116, 730–735.Google Scholar
  3. Abrams, P.A.: 1987, ‘On Classifying Interactions Between Populations’,Oecologia 73, 272–281.Google Scholar
  4. Andrewartha, H.G. and Birch, L.C.: 1954,The Distribution and Abundance of Animals, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  5. Andrewartha, H.G. and Birch, L.C.: 1984,The Ecological Web, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  6. Cartwright, N.: 1983,How the Laws of Physics Lie, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  7. Cody, M.L. and Diamond, J.M., eds.: 1975,Ecology and Evolution of Communities, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  8. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology, Vol. XXII (1958).Google Scholar
  9. Colwell, R.K.: 1984, ‘What's New? Community Ecology Discovers Biology’, in Price, P.W., Slobodchikoff, C.N. and Gaud, W.S. (eds.),A New Ecology: Novel Approaches to Interactive Systems, Wiley, New York, pp. 387–396.Google Scholar
  10. Connell, J.H.: 1980, ‘Diversity and the Coevolution of Competitors; or, the Ghost of Competition Past’,Oikos 35, 131–138.Google Scholar
  11. Cooper, G.: 1988, ‘Fitness and Explanation’, in Fine A. and Leplin J. (eds.),PSA 1988 1, 207–215.Google Scholar
  12. Cooper, G.: 1989,Ecology and Evolution, A Philosophical Study, PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  13. Cooper, G.: 1990, ‘The Explanatory Tools of Theoretical Population Biology’, in Fine A., Forbes M., and Wessels L. (eds.),PSA 1990 1, 165–178.Google Scholar
  14. Diamond, J. and Case, T., eds.: 1986,Community Ecology, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Fenchel, T.: 1975, ‘Character Displacement and Coexistence in Mud Snails (Hydrobiidae)’,Oecologia 20, 19–32.Google Scholar
  16. Greenwoord, P.J., Harvey, P.H. and Slatkin, M. (eds.): 1985,Evolution, Essays in Honour of John Maynard Smith, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  17. Haila, Y.: 1988, ‘The Multiple Faces of Ecological Theory and Data’,Oikos 53, 408–410.Google Scholar
  18. Haila, Y. and Jarvinnen, O.: 1980, ‘The Role of Theoretical Concepts in Understanding the Ecological Theatre: A Case Study in Island Biogeography’, in Saarinen (1980).Google Scholar
  19. Howard, L.O. and Fiske, W.F.: 1911, ‘The Importation into the United States of the Parasites of the Gipsy Moth and the Brown Tail Moth’, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Bureau of Entomology. Bulletin no. 91, reprinted New York: Arno Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  20. Hutchinson, G.E.: 1958, ‘Concluding Remarks’, in Cold Spring Harbor (1958).Google Scholar
  21. Hutchinson, G.E.: 1978,An Introduction to Population Ecology, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  22. Kingsland, S.: 1985,Modeling Nature, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  23. Kingsland, S.: 1986, ‘Mathematical Figments, Biological Facts: Population Ecology in the Thirties’,Journal of the History of Biology 19, 235–256.Google Scholar
  24. Kitcher, P.: 1981, ‘Explanatory Unification’,Philosophy of Science 48, 507–531.Google Scholar
  25. Kitcher, P.: 1985a, ‘Two Approaches to Explanation’,Journal of Philosophy LXXXII, 632–639.Google Scholar
  26. Kitcher, P.: 1985b,Vaulting Ambition, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  27. Kitcher, P.: 1989, ‘Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World’, in Kitcher and Salmon (1989).Google Scholar
  28. Kitcher, P. and Salmon, W.C.: 1989,Scientific Explanation, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
  29. Lack, D.: 1954,The Natural Regulation of Animal Numbers, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  30. Levins, R.: 1966, ‘The Strategy of Model Building in Population Biology’,American Scientist 54, 421–431.Google Scholar
  31. Levins, R.: 1968,Evolution in Changing Environments, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  32. Lewontin, R.C.: 1974,The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change, Columbia Univ. Press, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Lewontin, R.C.: 1980, ‘Theoretical Population Genetics in the Evolutionary Synthesis’, in Mayr and Provine (1980).Google Scholar
  34. Lewontin, R.C.: 1985, ‘Population Genetics’, in Greenwood et al. (1985).Google Scholar
  35. MacArthur, R.H.: 1957, ‘On the Relative Abundance of Bird Species’,Proc. Nat. Acad. Sciences 43: 293–295.Google Scholar
  36. MacArthur, R.H.: 1972,Geographical Ecology, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  37. MacArthur, R.H. and Levins, R.: 1967, ‘The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species’,American Naturalist 101, 377–385.Google Scholar
  38. May, R.M.: 1973,Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  39. May, R.M.: 1977, ‘Mathematical Models and Ecology: Past and Future’, in Goulden (1977).Google Scholar
  40. May, R.M.: 1981,Theoretical Ecology, Sinauer and Assoc., Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar
  41. Mayr, E.: 1963,Animal Species and Evolution, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  42. Nicholson, A.J.: 1933, ‘The Balance of Animal Populations’,Journal of Animal Ecology 2, 132–178.Google Scholar
  43. Nicholson, A.J.: 1954, ‘An Outline of the Dynamics of Animal Populations’,Australian Journal of Zoology 2, 9–65.Google Scholar
  44. Nicholson, A.J.: 1960, ‘The Role of Population Dynamics in Natural Selection’, in Tax (1960).Google Scholar
  45. Nicholson, A.J. and Bailey, V.A.: 1935, ‘The Balance of Animal Populations’,Proceeding of the Zoological Society of London, part three, 551–598.Google Scholar
  46. Orians, G.H.: 1962, ‘Natural Selection and Ecological Theory’,American Naturalist 96, 257–264.Google Scholar
  47. Ospovat, D.: 1981,The Development of Darwin's Theory: Natural History, Natural Theology, and Natural Selection, 1838–1859, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  48. Pianka, E.: 1981, ‘Competition and Niche Theory’, in May (1981).Google Scholar
  49. Pielou, E.C.: 1977,Mathematical Ecology, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  50. Popper, K.: 1959,The Logic of Scienfic Discovery, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  51. Prout, T.: 1965, ‘The Estimation of Fitness from Genotypic Frequencies’,Evolution 19, 546–551.Google Scholar
  52. Pulliam, H.R.: 1975, ‘Coexistence of Sparrows: A Test of Competition Theory’,Science 189, 474–76.Google Scholar
  53. Richards, O.: 1928, ‘The Growth of the YeastSaccharomyces cerevisiae. I. The Growth Curve, Its Mathematical Analysis, and the Effect of Temperature on the Yeast Growth’,Annals of Botany 42, 271–283.Google Scholar
  54. Roughgarden, J.: 1984, ‘Competition and Theory in Community Ecology’, in Salt (1984).Google Scholar
  55. Roughgarden, J.: 1986, ‘A Comparison of Food Limited and Space Limited Animal Competition Communities’, in Diamond and Case (1986).Google Scholar
  56. Roughgarden, J. and Diamond, J.: 1986, ‘Overview: The Role of Species Interactions in Community Ecology’, in Diamond and Case (1986).Google Scholar
  57. Saarinen, E. (ed.): 1980,Conceptual Issues in Ecology, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  58. Salmon, W.: 1984,Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  59. Salmon, W.: 1985, ‘Conflicting Conceptions of Scientific Explanation’,Journal of Philosophy LXXXII, 651–654.Google Scholar
  60. Salt, G., ed.: 1984,Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  61. Schoener, T.: 1986a, ‘Mechanistic Approaches to Community Ecology: A New Reductionism?’,American Zoologist 26, 74–100.Google Scholar
  62. Schoener, T.: 1986b, ‘Overview: Kinds of Ecological Communities — Ecology Becomes Pluralistic’, in Diamond and Case (1986).Google Scholar
  63. Simberloff, D.: 1984, ‘Competition Theory, Hypothesis Testing, and other Community Ecological Buzzwords’, in Salt (1984).Google Scholar
  64. Simberloff, D. and Boecklen, W.: 1981 ‘Santa Rosalia Reconsidered’,Evolution 35, 1206–1228.Google Scholar
  65. Sloep, P.: 1986, ‘Null Hypotheses in Ecology: Towards the Dissolution of a Controversy’, in Fine, A. and Machmer, P. (eds.),PSA 1986 1, 307–313.Google Scholar
  66. Strong, D., Simberloff, D., Abele, L. and Thistle, A., eds.: 1984,Ecological Communities, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  67. Tax, S., ed.: 1960,Evolution After Darwin, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  68. Werner, E.: 1984, ‘The Mechanisms of Species Interactions and Community Organization in Fish’, in Strong, et al. (1984)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregory Cooper
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations