Advertisement

Annals of sex research

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 467–484 | Cite as

The role of victim age and sexual maturity in child sexual abuse

  • R. Lang
  • A. C. Rouget
  • V. van Santen
Article

Abstract

The case records of 240 children with validated sexual abuse were compared to 113 nonabused female children matched for age and education. Most were female (91%) with 65% of the children being 10 years of age or younger. The average age for all children was 8.47 years. In this study, chronological age was compared to the five stages of sexual maturity, as defined by Tanner (1978) to determine which was better in identifying the abused children. Use of arbitrary age limits makes it difficult to identify what victim features appeal to pedophilic and incestuous men. The results indicated that the majority of child victims (67%) were Tanner stage 1's, the least sexually mature. Of special import, it is the smaller, lighter, and least sexually mature children who appear to hold the most attraction for the sexual abuse perpetrator. More sexually mature children (Tanner 4's and 5's) were more often subjected to intrusive sexual acts: digital, oral, anal, and vaginal penetration. Older girls, also, were more likely to be threatened or bribed. Though age and Tanner scores correlated 0.75, this relationship does not resolve the diagnostic problem of pedophilia. However, for children 10 years or older, the Tanner score may be more informative than chronological age as a predictor of pedophilic attraction to children. This study calls into question the almost exclusive use of chronological age as a putative criterion for diagnosing child sexual offenders.

Keywords

Sexual Abuse Abuse Child Child Sexual Abuse Sexual Maturity Sexual Offender 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abel, G.G., Becker, J.V., & Cuningham-Rathner, J. (1984) Complications, consent, and cognitions in sex between children and adults.International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 7, 89–103.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (1980).Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder, 3rd ed., Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  3. Browne, A., & Finkelhor, D. (1986). Impact of child sexual abuse: A review of the research.Psychological Bulletin, 99, 66–77.Google Scholar
  4. Cupoli, J.M. & Sewell, P.M. (1988). One thousand fifty-nine children with a chief complaint of sex abuse.Child Abuse & Neglect, 12, 151–162.Google Scholar
  5. Erickson, W.D., Walbek, N.H., & Seely, R.K. (1988). Behavior patterns of child molesters.Archives of Sexual Behavior, 17, 77–86.Google Scholar
  6. Finkelhor, D. (1984).Sexually victimized children. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Finkelhor. D. (1986).A sourcebook of child sexual abuse. San Fransisco, Ca: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Freund, K., McKnight, C.K., Langevin, R., & Cibiri, S. (1972). The female child as a surrogate object.Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2, 119–133.Google Scholar
  9. Fuller, K.A., Barnard, G., Robbins, L., & Spears, H. (1988). Sexual maturity as a criterion for classification of phallometric stimulus slides.Archives of Sexual Behavior, 17, 271–276.Google Scholar
  10. Groth, A.N., & Burgess, A.W. (1979). Sexual trauma in the life histories of rapists and child molestors.Victimology, 4, 10–16.Google Scholar
  11. Groth, A.N., Hobson, W.F., & Gary, T.S. (1982). The child molestor: clinical observations. In J. Conte & D.A. Shore (Eds.),Social work and child sexual abuse. New York: Haworth.Google Scholar
  12. Job, J.C. and Pierson, M. (1981).Pediatric endocrinology, New York: Wiley Medical Publication.Google Scholar
  13. Lang, R.A., Black, E.L., Frenzel, R.R., & Checkley, K.L. (1988). Aggression and erotic attraction toward children in incestuous and pedophilic men.Annals of Sex Research, 1, 417–441.Google Scholar
  14. Lang, R.A., & Frenzel, R.R. (1988). Morphologic and behavioral features in child sex abuse victims. (In preparation).Google Scholar
  15. Langevin, R. (1983).Sexual strands: understanding and treating sexual anomalies in men. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Langevin, R. & Lang, R.A. (1985) Psychological treatment of pedophiles.Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 3, 403–419.Google Scholar
  17. Langevin, R., & Lang, R.A. (1988).Incest offenders: a practical guide to assessment and treatment. Toronto: Juniper Press.Google Scholar
  18. Laws, D.R. (1984). The assessment of dangerous sexual behavior in males.Medicine and Law, 3, 127–140.Google Scholar
  19. Marshall, W.L., Barbaree, H.E., & Butt, J. (1988). Sexual offenders against male children: sexual preferences.Behaviour Research & Therapy, 26, 383–391.Google Scholar
  20. Mohr, J., Turner, R.E., & Jerry, M.B. (1964).Pedophilia and exhibitionism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  21. Quinsey, V.L., Chaplin, T.C., & Carrigan, W.F. (1979). Sexual preferences amongst incestuous and nonincestuous child molesters.Behavior Therapy, 10, 562–656.Google Scholar
  22. Quinsey, V.L., & Marshall, W.L. (1983) Procedures for reducing inappropriate sexual arousal: An evaluation review. In J.G. Greer (Eds.)The sexual aggressor: current perspectives and treatment (pp.267–289. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.Google Scholar
  23. Rouget, A.C., Lang, R.A., & Joffres, M.R. (1988). Sexually transmitted diseases in abused children and adolescents.Annals of Sex Research, 1, 95–114.Google Scholar
  24. Tanner, J. M. (1978).Foetus into man: physical growth from conception to maturity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Underwood, L.E., & Van Wyk, J.J. (1985). Normal and aberrant growth. In Wilson, J.D. & Foster, D. W. (Eds.),Textbook of endocrinology, 7th edition, pp 155–205. Philadelphia,PA: W.B. Saunders Co.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Juniper Press 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Lang
    • 1
  • A. C. Rouget
    • 2
  • V. van Santen
    • 3
  1. 1.Alberta Hospital Edmonton & Institute of Psychology and LawEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.University of Alberta HospitalEdmontonCanada
  3. 3.Institute of Psychology & LawEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations