Annals of sex research

, Volume 4, Issue 3–4, pp 239–263 | Cite as

The use of polygraphy with sex offenders

  • Stan Abrams


The author has summarized the history, psychophysiologic bases, validity, and techniques of polygraphy. Methods for the use of this approach with sexual abusers are described along with the findings as they relate to both the usefulness of these procedures and their validity.


Sexual Abuser Psychophysiologic Base 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abrams, S. (1973). Polygraph validity and reliability: A review.Journal of Forensic Science, 18, 313–326.Google Scholar
  2. Abrams, S. (1974). The validity of the polygraph with schizophrenics.Polygraph 3, 328–337.Google Scholar
  3. Abrams, S. (1975). The Validity of the polygraph technique with children.Journal of Police Science and Administration, 3, 310–311.Google Scholar
  4. Abrams, S. (1977).A polygraph handbook for attorneys. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
  5. Abrams, S. (1989).The complete polygraph handbook. Lexingtron, MA: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
  6. Abrams, S. (1991). Polygraphy: A new beginning.Polygraph 20, 204–213.Google Scholar
  7. Abrams, S., Hoyt, D., & Jewell, C., (1991). The effectiveness of the disclosure test with sex abusers of children.Polygraph, 20, 197–203.Google Scholar
  8. Abrams, S, & Ogard, E. (1986). Polygraph surveillance of probationers.Polygraph 15, 174–182.Google Scholar
  9. Abrams, S., & Weinstein, E. (1974). The validity of the polygraph with retardates.Journal of Police Science and Administration, 2, 11–14.Google Scholar
  10. Ansley, N., & Garwood, M. (1984) The accuracy and utility of polygraph testing. Washington, D.C: Department of Defense.Google Scholar
  11. Barland, G.H., & Raskin, D.C. (1974, October). Psychopathy and detection of deception in criminal suspects. Paper presented at the Society for Psychophysiological Research, Salt Lake City. (Available through Psychology Department, University of Utah).Google Scholar
  12. Barland, G.H., & Raskin, D.C. (1976). Validity and reliability of polygraph examination of criminal suspects. (Report No 76-1). Washington, D.C: National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, U.S. Department of Justice (Contract No. N1-99-0001).Google Scholar
  13. Bersch, P.J. (1969). A validation study of polygraph examiner judgments.Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 399–403.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bitterman, M.E., & Marcuse, F.L. (1947). Cardiovascular responses of innocent persons to criminal interrogation.American Journal of Psychology, 60, 407–412.Google Scholar
  15. Elasberg, W. (1946). Forensic psychology.Southern California Law Revision, 19, 349–409.Google Scholar
  16. Davidson, W.A. (1979). Validity and reliability of the cardio activity monitor.Polygraph 8, 104–111.Google Scholar
  17. Frye v. US, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir 1923).Google Scholar
  18. Gustafson, L.A., & Orne, M.T. (1963). Effects of heightened motivation in the detection of deception.Journal of Applied Psychology, 47, 405–411.Google Scholar
  19. Holmes, W.D. (1965). The degree of objectivity in chart interpretation. In, V.A. Leonard, (Ed.),Academy lectures on lie detection. Springfield, IL: Thomas.Google Scholar
  20. Horvath, F.S. (1977). The effect on selected variables on interpretation of polygraph records.Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 127–136.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Horvath, F.S., & Reid, J.E. (1971). The reliability of polygraph examiner diagnosis of truth and deception.Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology and Police Science, 62, 276–281.Google Scholar
  22. Hunter, F.L., & Ash, P. (1973). The accuracy and consistency of polygraph examiners' diagnosis.Journal of Police Science and Administration, 1, 370–375.Google Scholar
  23. Kubis, J.F. (1957). Instrumental, chemical and psychological aids in the interrogation of witnesses.Journal of Social Studies, 13, 40–57.Google Scholar
  24. Larson, J.A. (1921). Modification of the Marston Deception Test.Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 12, 390–399.Google Scholar
  25. Larson, J.A. (1932).Lying and its detection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lykken, D.T. (1960). The validity of the guilty knowledge technique: The effects of faking.Journal of Applied Psychology, 44, 258–262.Google Scholar
  27. Marston, W.M. (1921). Psychological possibilities in the deception tests.Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 11, 551–570.Google Scholar
  28. Office of Technology Assessment. (1983, November). Scientific validity of polygraph testing: A research review and evaluation - A technical memorandum (OTA-TM-H-15). Washington, D.D: Office of Technology Assessment.Google Scholar
  29. Patrick, C.J., & Iacono, W.G. (1987). Validity and reliability of the control question polygraph test: A scientific investigation.Psychophysiology, 24, 604–605.Google Scholar
  30. Slowic, S.M., & Buckley, J.P. (1975). Relative accuracy of polygraph examiner diagnosis of respiration, blood pressure, and GSR recordings.Journal of Police Science and Administration, 3, 305–309.Google Scholar
  31. State v. Gipson, 24 M.J. 246 (CMA, 1987).Google Scholar
  32. State v. Wilson, 17 Ore. App. 375, 521 P. 2d. 1317 (1974) cert. den. 420 U.S. 910, 95, S.Ct. 829, 42, L.Ed. 2d. 839. (1975).Google Scholar
  33. US v. Piccinonna, 885F2d. 1529 46 Crl 1047, 11th Cir. (1989).Google Scholar
  34. Wicklander, D.S., & Hunter, F.L. (1975). The influence of auxiliary sources of deception in polygraph diagnosis.Journal of Police Science and Administration, 3, 405–409.Google Scholar
  35. Widacki, J., & Horvath, F. (1978). An experimental investigation of the relative validity and utility of the polygraph technique and three other common methods of criminal identification.Journal of Forensic Science, 23, 596–601.Google Scholar
  36. Winter, J.E. (1936). A comparison of the cardio-pneumo-psychograph and association methods in the detection of lying in cases of theft among college students.Journal of Applied Psychology, 20, 243–248.Google Scholar
  37. Wolfe, D. (1941). Truth serums report prepared for the Emergency Committee in Psychology. Seattle, WA: National Research Council.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Juniper Press 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stan Abrams
    • 1
  1. 1.Clinical PsychologistPortland

Personalised recommendations