Annals of sex research

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 215–226 | Cite as

Gender differences in college student sexual abuse victims and their offenders

  • Gloria J. Fischer
Article

Abstract

A sample of 796 students in psychology classes completed an anonymous sex survey that included questions to identify sexual abuse victims (as children, teenagers, or adults) and their offenders. Most child sexual abuse was incestuous, with women students more likely to have been abused by a nuclear or non-nuclear family member, and men students were more likely to have been abused by a non-nuclear family member or family friend. Heterosexual abuse predominated in both genders, but more so in women (86%) than in men (64%). Homosexual child abuse predominated in males offended by a family friend and was common in women only when the offender was a babysitter. Though most child sexual abuse in college students was incestuous (59% of female and 38% of male child victims), the incidence of incestuous abuse was less than that found in a clinical sample (71% and 60%, respectively). On the other hand, college student male child victims were not abused at a younger age than female child victims, as has been reported in clinical samples. The latter finding may be spurious, a function of the inclusion of teenage victims in clinical samples, where females are over-represented. Cognitive predictors of teenage or adult sexual abuse were: uncertainty that forcible rape in a date rape vignette really was rape; a lesser tendency to blame the male perpetrator; and more accurate sexual knowledge. Child sexual abuse also was a predictor of teenage or adult sexual abuse, especially in women.

Keywords

Sexual Abuse Child Sexual Abuse Sexual Knowledge Child Victim Woman Student 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Connon, A.F. (1984). Sexual abuse of children.Australian New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 24, 139–142.Google Scholar
  2. Farber, E.D., Showers, J., Johnson, C.F., Joseph, F.A. & Oshins, L. (1984). The sexual abuse of children: A comparison of male and female victims.Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 13, 294–297.Google Scholar
  3. Finkelhor, D. (1981). The sexual abuse of boys.Victimology, 6, 76–84.Google Scholar
  4. Finkelhor, D., & Hotaling, G.T. (1984). Sexual abuse in the national incidence study of child abuse and neglect: An appraisal.Child Abuse & Neglect, 8, 23–33.Google Scholar
  5. Fischer, G.J. (1986). College student attitudes toward forcible date rape: I. Cognitive predictors.Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 457–466.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fischer, G.J. (1987). Hispanic and majority student attitudes toward forcible date rape as a function of differences in attitudes toward women.Sex Roles, 17, 93–101.Google Scholar
  7. Fischer, G.J. (1991a). Is lesser severity of child sexual abuse a reason more males report having liked it?Annals of Sex Research, 4, 131–139.Google Scholar
  8. Fischer, G.J. (1991b). Cognitive predictors of not guilty verdicts in simulated acquaintance rape trial.Psychological Reports, 68, 1199–1206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fischer, G.J. (1992). Sex attitudes and prior victimization predictors of college student sex offences.Annals of Sex Research, 5, 53–60.Google Scholar
  10. Fromuth, M.E., & Burkhart, B.R. (1987). Childhood sexual victimization among college men: Definitional and methodological issues.Violence and Victims, 2, 241–258.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Giarruso, R. Johnson, P., Goodchilds, J., & Zellman, G. (1979). Adolescent cues and signals: Sex and assault. Paper presented at meetings of the Western Psychological Association, San Diego.Google Scholar
  12. Koss, M.P., & Dinero, T.E. (1989). Discriminant analysis of risk factors for sexual victimization among a national sample of college women.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 242–250.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Pierce, R., & Pierce, L.H. (1985). The sexually abused child: A comparison of male and female victims.Child Abuse and Neglect, 9, 191–199.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rosenthal, T.L., Muran, D., Tolley, B., Dorko, B., & Brown, J. (1991). Sexually abused youngsters' reactions toward abusive and non-abusive parent figures and kin.Journal of Sex Education & Therapy, 17, 157–66.Google Scholar
  15. Runtz, M.G. (1987, June). The sexual victimization of women. The link between child abuse and revictimization. Paper presented at meetings of the Canadian Psychological Association, Vancouver, BC.Google Scholar
  16. Russell, D.E.H. (1986).The secret trauma. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Spence, J.T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1973). A short version of the Attitudes Toward Women scale (AWS).Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2, 219–220.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Juniper Press 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gloria J. Fischer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWashington State UniversityPullman

Personalised recommendations