Advertisement

Annals of sex research

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 81–86 | Cite as

Erection response characteristics of adolescent sex offenders

  • Judith V. Becker
  • Robert M. Stein
  • Meg S. Kaplan
  • Jerry Cunningham-Rathner
Article

Abstract

One hundred and sixty adolescent sexual offenders were evaluated by penile plethysmography, using two-minute audiotaped stimulus cues. Results indicate that 80.6% of the adolescents achieved greater than 20% of an erection response. Mean latency from stimulus onset to maximum tumescence was 95 seconds. Mean latency to detumescence from stimulus offset was 109 seconds. These results indicate that adolescent males are suitable subjects for psychophysiologic assessment which can be used as part of an overall evaluation to determine treatment needs in this population.

Keywords

Stimulus Onset Response Characteristic Adolescent Male Suitable Subject Psychophysiologic Assessment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abel, G.G., Becker, J.V., Murphy, W.D., & Flanagan, B. (1981). Identifying dangerous child molesters. In R.B. Stuart (Ed.),Violent behavior: Social learning approaches to prediction, management and treatment (pp. 116–137). New York: Bruner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  2. Barlow, D.H., & Abel, G. G. (1976). Sexual deviation. In W.E. Craighead, A.E. Kazdin, & M.J. Mahoney (Eds.),Behavior modification: Principles, issues, and application (pp. 341–360). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, J.V., & Kaplan, M. (1990). Assessment of the adult sex offender. In P. McReynolds, J. Rosen, & G. Chelune (Eds.),Advances in psychological assessment. (pp. 261–283). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, J.V., Kaplan, J.S. & Tenke, C.E. (1992). The relationship of abuse history and denial on erectile response profiles of adolescent sexual perpetrators.Behavior Therapy, 23, 87–97.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, J.V., Hunter, J.A., Stein, R.M., & Kaplan, M.S. (1989). Factors associated with erection in adolescent sexual offenders.Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 2, 353–362.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, J.V., Kaplan, M., & Kavoussi, R. (1988). Measuring the effectiveness of treatment for the aggressive adolescent sexual offender. In R.A. Prentky & V.L. Quinsey (Eds.),Human sexual aggression: Current perspectives (pp. 215–222). New York: New York Academy of Science.Google Scholar
  7. Freund, K., Langevin, R., & Barlow, D.H. (1974). Comparison of two penile measures of erotic arousal.British Journal of Psychiatry, 124, 22–23.Google Scholar
  8. Murphy, W.D., & Barbaree, H.E. (1987). Assessments of sexual offenders by measures of erectile response: Psychometric properties and decision making. National Institute of Mental Health (Order # 886M0506500501D). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  9. Zuckerman, M. (1971). Physiological measure of sexual arousal in the human.Psychological Bulletin, 25, 297–327.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Juniper Press 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judith V. Becker
    • 1
  • Robert M. Stein
    • 2
  • Meg S. Kaplan
    • 3
  • Jerry Cunningham-Rathner
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of ArizonaUSA
  2. 2.Acadia & Co.Lancaster
  3. 3.New York State Psychiatric Institute College of Physicians & SurgeonsColumbia UniversityUSA
  4. 4.Demarest

Personalised recommendations