Annals of sex research

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 185–198 | Cite as

Covert communication between sex offenders and their child victims

  • Gerald Rogers
  • Kaye Renshaw
Article

Abstract

Covert communication between sex offenders and their child victims was examined. It was expected that sex offenders would acknowledge covert methods of communicating to their child victims (1) "an intent to molest" and (2) "a warning of silence". Data were gathered in open ended, self report format from a known group of child sexual offenders. Examination of the data revealed that a significant number of the participants acknowledged the utilization of covert methods of communicating to their child victims that they intended to molest them. The data further indicated that while 50% of the participants utilized overt methods of communicating a warning of silence to child victims, covert methods of communication were also used with significant frequency. The importance of the recognition of such covert communication is discussed in terms of protecting the child victim from post-disclosure revictimization; in the courtroom, in supervised or unsupervised visitation, and in reunification of the family.

Keywords

Significant Frequency Child Victim Covert Communication Child Sexual Offender Covert Method 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Finkelhor, D. (1979).Sexually victimized children. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Finkelhor, D. (1984).Child sexual abuse: New theory and research. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Groth, A.N., & Birnbaum, H.J. (1978). Adult sexual orientation and attraction to underage persons.Archives of Sexual Behavior, 7, 175–181.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hathaway, S.R., & McKinley, J.C. (1970).Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. (rev. ed.). New York: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  5. Langevin, R., (Ed.) (1985).Erotic preference, gender identity, and aggression in men: New research studies. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erllbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  6. Langevin, R., Paitich, D., Russon, A., Handy, L., & Langevin, A. (1990).Clarke Sex History Questionnaire for Males. Etobicoke, Ontario: Juniper Press.Google Scholar
  7. Lang, R.A., & Frenzel, R.R. (1988). How sex offenders lure children.Annals of Sex Research, 1, 303–317.Google Scholar
  8. Marshall, W.L., & Christie, M.N. (1981). Pedophilia and aggression.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 8, 145–158.Google Scholar
  9. Nichols, H.R., & Molinder, I. (1984).Multiphasic Sex Inventory. Washington: Nichols & Molinder.Google Scholar
  10. Peters, J.J. (1976). Children who are victims of sexual assault and the psychology of offenders.American Journal of Psychotherapy, 30, 398–421.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Russel, D.E.H., (1983). The incidence and prevalence of intrafamilial and extrafamilial sexual abuse of female children.Child Abuse and Neglect, 7, 133–146.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Sgori, S.M., (1978). Patterns of sexual assault against children and adolescents. In Burgess, A.W., Groth, A.N., Holstrom, L.L., and Sgori, S.M. (Eds.).Sexual assault of children and adolescents.. Toronto: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  13. Teall, E.N. (Ed.),Webster's dictionary. New York: Modern Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Juniper Press 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerald Rogers
    • 1
  • Kaye Renshaw
    • 1
  1. 1.Sex Offenders and Victims Treatment Program of AmarilloAmarillo

Personalised recommendations