Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of polygraphy on the self report of adolescent sex offenders: Implications for risk assessment

  • Published:
Annals of sex research

Abstract

The present study examined three sources of assault history information for seventy-six "high risk" adolescent sexual offenders: collateral (victim statements, police reports, psychological examinations, etc.), clinical interviews, and confirmation polygraph testing. Chi Square analysis revealed significant differences between data retrieved by use of clinical polygraph examination and both of the other data sources. Selected assault history variables assumed to be relevant for pre-treatment decision making and for which significant differences were observed, include: number of victims, process of victim selection, degree of force used in the commission of offenses, use of pornography, and degree of intrusion. The number of female child victims assaulted by the offenders was demonstrated to be significantly related to the severity of pornography used as a stimulus while masturbating. These findings are discussed in terms of pre-treatment decision making and implications for future study of adolescent sexual offenders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abel, G.G., Gore, D.K., Holland, C.L., Camps, N., Becker, J.V., & Rathner, J. (1989). The measurement of the cognitive distortions of child molesters.Annals of Sex Research, 2, 135–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abel, G.G., Mittelman, M.S., & Becker, J.V. (1985). Sexual offenders: Results of assessment and recommendations for treatment. In M.H. Ben-Aron, S. J. Hucker, & C.D. Webster (Eds.).Clinical criminology: The assessment and treatment of criminal behaviour (pp. 191–205). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, S. (1986). Polygraph surveillance of probationers.Polygraph, 15, 174–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, S. (1991). The use of polygraphy with sex offenders.Annals of Sex Research, 4, 239–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J.V., & Abel, G.G. (1985). Methodological and ethical issues in evaluating and treating adolescent sexual offenders. In E.M. Otey & G.D. Ryan (Eds.),Adolescent sex offenders: Issues in research and treatment (pp. 109–129). (Department of Health and Human Services Publication No. ADM-85-1396). Rockville, MD; NIMH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J.V., Cunningham-Rathner, J., & Kaplan, M.S. (1986). Adolescent sexual offenders: Demographics, criminal and sexual histories, and recommendations for reducing future offenses.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1, 431–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J.V., & Stein, R.M. (1991). Is sexual erotica associated with sexual deviance in adolescent males?Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 14, 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengis, S.M. (1986).A comprehensive service-delivery system with a continuum of care for adolescent sexual offenders. Orwell, V.T.: The Safer Society Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Children's Services Division, Dept. of Human Resources, State of Oregon. (1986, December).Oregon juvenile sex offender task force: An executive summary of the Oregon report on juvenile sexual offenders. 1948 Commercial Street, S.E., Salem, OR97310.

  • Emerick, R.L. (1988).Alternatives to sexual misbehavior: A treatment workbook for the adolescent sexual offender (rev. ed.). PMH Health Resources, Inc., Phoenix, AZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindman, J. (1988). Research disputes assumptions about child molesters.National District Attorneys Association, NDAA Bulletin, 7, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, T.J., & Lafond, M.A. (1988). Treatment of the adolescent sexual offender.Child and Adolescent Social Work, 5, 135–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knopp, F.H., Freeman-Longo, R., & Stevenson, W.F. (1992).Nationwide survey of juvenile & adult sex-offender treatment programs & models. Orwell, VT.: The Safer Society Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalumiere, M.L., & Quinsey, V.L. (1991). Polygraph testing of child molesters: Are we ready?Violence Update, 1, 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langevin, R. (1988). Defensiveness in sex offenders. In R. Rogers (Ed.),Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (pp. 269–290). New York: Gilford Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langevin, R., Wright, P., & Handy, L., (1988). What treatment do sex offenders want?Annals of Sex Research 1, 363–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner, M.H., Marques, J.K., Day, D.M., & Nelson, C. (1990). Impact of relapse prevention in treating sex offenders: Preliminary findings.Annals of Sex Research, 3, 165–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, H.R., & Molinder, I. (1984).Multiphasic sex inventory manual. Nichols & Molinder, Tacoma, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preliminary Report from The National Task Force on Juvenile Sexual Offending (1988).Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 39, 1–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R., & Dickey, R. (1991). Denial and minimization among sex offenders. A review of competing models of deception.Annals of Sex Research, 4, 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Emerick, R.L., Dutton, W.A. The effect of polygraphy on the self report of adolescent sex offenders: Implications for risk assessment. Annals of Sex Research 6, 83–103 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00849301

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00849301

Keywords

Navigation