Skip to main content
Log in

Ethical and legal considerations in the care of the infant with end-stage renal disease whose parents elect conservative therapy

An American perspective

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When parents elect conservative treatment for infants with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), their choice is medically, ethically, and legally acceptable, since dialysis and transplantation for young infants are still in the range of innovative and experimental treatments. Pediatric nephrologists have been reluctant to view these treatments as standard for very young infants because of doubts about their efficacy, technical difficulties in providing them for tiny patients, uncertainty about their short-term and long-term risks, and the suffering that they can create. Because these renal replacement therapies are not yet established, it is the responsibility of parents to determine whether the benefits of treatment outweigh its burdens for their infants. Physicians have an obligation to ensure that parents make a well-considered decision, and to provide them with counsel and support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gustafson JM (1973) Mongolism, parental desires and the right to life. Perspect Biol Med 16: 529–557

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Child Abuse Amendments of 1984, Public Law No. 98-457, Title 1, sections 121–28, 98 Stat 1749–1755; codified in United States Code Annotated, Title 42, sections 5101–5103 [Suppl 1985]. West Publishing Co., St Paul, Minn.

  3. Potter DE, Holliday MA, Piel CF, Feduska NJ, Belzer FO, Salvatierra O Jr (1980) Treatment of end-stage renal disease in children: a 15-year experience. Kidney Int 18: 103–109

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Alexander SR (1984) Treatment of infants with ESRD. In: Fine RN, Gruskin AB (eds) End stage renal disease in children. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 17–29

    Google Scholar 

  5. Miller LC, Bock GH, Lum CT, Mauer SM (1982) Transplantation of the adult kidney into the very small child: long-term outcome. J Pediatr 100: 675–680

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fine R (1982) Renal transplantation in children. J Pediatr 100: 754–755

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moel DI, Butt KMH (1981) Renal transplantation in children less than 2 years of age. J Pediatr 99: 535–539

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nevins TE, Mauer SM (1984) Infant hemodialysis. In: Fine RN, Gruskin AB (eds) End stage renal disease in children. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 39–53

    Google Scholar 

  9. Engle WD (1986) Evaluation of renal function and acute renal failure in the neonate. Pediatr Clin North Am 33: 129–151

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Salusky IB, Lucullo L, Nelson P, Fine R (1982) Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in children. Pediatr Clin North Am 29: 1005–1012

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alexander S (1984) CAPD in infants less than one year of age. In: Fine RN, Gruskin AB (eds) End stage renal disease in children. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 149–171

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baum M, Powell D, Calvin S, McDaid T, McHenry K, Mar H, Potter D (1982) Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in children: comparison with hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 307: 1537–1542

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Office of Secretary (1974) Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45, Part 46, 10. Protection of human subjects, Federal Register 39: 18919–18920. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 20402

    Google Scholar 

  14. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1977) Report and recommendations: research involving children. Department of Health Education and Welfare Publication Number (OS) 77-0004-5, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 20402

    Google Scholar 

  15. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Secretary (1978) Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45, Part 46. Protection of human subjects: research involving children. Federal Register 43: 31786–31794, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 20402

    Google Scholar 

  16. McCormick R (1974) To save or let die. JAMA 229: 172–176

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cohen C (1983) Quality of life and the analogy with the Nazis. J Med Philos 8: 113–135

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pope Pius XII (1958) The prolongation of life. The pope speaks. Vatican City 4: 393–396

    Google Scholar 

  19. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Secretary (1984) Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45, Part 85. Nondiscrimination on the basis of handicap; procedures and guidelines relating to health care for handicapped infants, Federal Register 49: 1622–1654. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 20402

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bowen versus American Hospital Association (1986) Supreme Court Reporter 106: 2101–2158

    Google Scholar 

  21. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Human Development Services (1985) Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45, Part 1340. Child abuse and neglect prevention and treatment program, final rule, Federal Register 50: 14873–14892. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 20402

    Google Scholar 

  22. Murray TH (1985) The final, anticlimactic rule on Baby Doe. Hastings Cent Rep 15: 5–9

    Google Scholar 

  23. Weil WB (1986) The Baby Doe regulations: another view of change. Hastings Cent Rep 16: 12–13

    Google Scholar 

  24. Moskop JC, Saldanha RL (1986) The Baby Doe rule: still a threat. Hastings Cent Rep 16: 8–14

    Google Scholar 

  25. In re Agor (1878) Century Digest 10: 49

    Google Scholar 

  26. In re Hudson (1942) Pacific Reporter, 2nd series 126: 765–792 (Washington)

  27. Parham versus JR (1979) US Rep 442: 584–639

  28. Jehovah's Witnesses of Washington versus King County Hospital (1967) Federal supplement 278: 488–508, affirmed (1968) US Rep 390: 598

    Google Scholar 

  29. Custody of a Minor (1978) Northeastern Reporter, 2nd series 379: 1053–1067, (1979) Northeastern Reporter, 2nd series 393: 836–847 (Massachusetts)

  30. Holder AR (1985) Legal issues in pediatrics and adolescent medicine. 2nd edn. Yale University Press, New York, P101

    Google Scholar 

  31. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1983) Deciding to forego life-sustaining treatment. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, p 223

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cohen, C. Ethical and legal considerations in the care of the infant with end-stage renal disease whose parents elect conservative therapy. Pediatr Nephrol 1, 166–171 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00849289

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00849289

Key words

Navigation