Skip to main content
Log in

Sandy ideas and coloured days: Some computational implications of embodiment

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is an exploration of the relationship between language and vision from the perspective of language evolution on the one hand, and metaphor on the other. Recent research has suggested that the origins of human language capacity can be traced to the evolution of a region in the brain that permits the interaction of information from sensory and motor cortices. In light of this, it is hypothesised that the computational mechanisms of language are derived from those of the sensory-motor domain, and that the pervasiveness of metaphor is one manifestation of language's computational antecedants. A variety of cognitive and computational implications are drawn from these hypotheses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, E. S., Dunlea, A. & Kekelis, L. (1993). The Impact of Input: Language Acquisition in the Visually Impaired.First Language 13: 23–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, B. & Kay, P. (1969).Basic Color Terms: Their University and Evolution. University of California Press: Berkeley, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M. (1979). More About Metaphor. In Ortony, A. (ed.)Metaphor and Thought, 19–43. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chafe, W. (1987). Cognitive Constraints on Information Flow. In Tomlin, R. (ed.)Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, 21–51. Benjamins: Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1967).Aspects of a Theory of Syntax.

  • Cytowic, R. E. (1992).The Man Who Tasted Shapes. Abacus: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cytowic, R. E. & Wood, F. B. (1982a). Synesthesia I: A Review of the Theories and Their Brain Basis.Brain and Cognition 1: 23–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cytowic, R. E. & Wood, F. B. (1982b). Synesthesia II: Psychophysical Relationships in the Synesthesia of Geometrically Shaped Taste and Coloured Hearing.Brain and Cognition 1: 36–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cytowic, R. E. (1989).Synesthesia: A Union of the Senses. Springer-Verlag: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, G. M. (1987).Neural Darwinism: The Theory of Neuronal Group Selection. Basic Books: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, J., Lakoff, G., Bailey, D., Narayanan, S., Regier, T. & Stolcke, A. (forthcoming in this Journal). L0 — The First four Years.Artificial Intelligence Review.

  • Fox, B. A. & Thompson, S. (1990). A Discourse Explanation of he Grammar of Relative Clauses in English Conversation.Language 66: 297–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geschwind, N. (1965). Disconnexion Syndromes in Animals and Man.Brain 88: 237–294, 585–664.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R. L. (1974).Concepts and Mechanisms of Perception, Gerald Duckworth & Co. Ltd: London, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, B. (1977).The Representation and Use of Focus in Dialogue Understanding. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadamard, J. (1945).The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field. Princeton University Press. Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoue, K. (1993).Linguistic Agreement, Conceptual Coherence, and Linguistic Residue in the Japanese Numeral Classifier System. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

  • Lakoff, G. (1989).Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980).Metaphors We Live By. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, P. (1992). On the Evolutionary Biology of Speech and Syntax. In Wind, J., Chiarelli, B., Bichakjian, B. & Nocentini, A. (eds.)Language Origin: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, M. & Hubel, D. (1988). Segregation of Form, Color, Movement, and Depth: Anatomy, Physiology, and Perception.Nature 240: 740–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1968).The Mind of a Mnemonist. Basic Books: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, D. (1992).Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, D. (1979).The Conceptual Basis of Language. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1954).The Construction of Reality in the Child. Basic Books: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R. (1989).The Emperor's New Mind. Oxford University Press: Oxford, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, R., Egan, O., Harper, J. & Harris, J. (1986).ESPRIT Project 527. Dialogue Studies: Main Phase (Deliverable 4). Educational Research Centre, St Patrick's College, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolls, E. (1989). The Representation and Storage of Information in Neuronal Networks in the Primate Cerebral Cortex and Hippocampus. In Durbin, R., Miall, C. & Mitchison, G. (eds.)The Computing Neuron, 125–159. Addison-Wesley: Wokingham, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. (1973). Natural Categories.Cognitive Psychology 4: 328–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E. (1979). Some Problems with the Notion of Literal Meanings. In Ortony, A. (ed.)Metaphor and Thought, 78–90. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlegoff, E. (1989). The Relevance of Repair to Syntax-for-Conversation. In Givón, T. (ed.)Syntax and Semantics Volume 12: Discourse and Syntax, 261–286. Academic Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Servan-Schreiber, D., Cleeremans, A. & McClelland, J. L. (1991). Graded State Machines: The Representation of Temporal Constraints in Simple Recurrent Networks.Machine Learning 7: 161–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheperd, G. M. & Koch, C. (1992). Introduction to Synaptic Circuits. In Sheperd, G. M. (ed.)The Synaptic Organization of the Brain, 3–31. Oxford University Press: Oxford, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuyoshi, O. & Thompson, S. (1993). What Can Conversation Tell us About Syntax? Invited paper presented to Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, University of Colorado at Boulder, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, P. (1990). Imagery as a Heuristic in the Comprehension of Metaphorical Analogies. In Gilhooly, K. J., Keane, M. T. G., Logie, R. H. & Erdos, G. (eds.)Lines of Thinking: Reflections on the Psychology of Thought. Volume 1 — Representation, Reasoning, Analogy, and Decision making. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, W. & Wakefield, J. (in press). Brain Evolution and Neurolinguistic Preconditions.Brain and Behavioral Sciences.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reilly, R.G. Sandy ideas and coloured days: Some computational implications of embodiment. Artif Intell Rev 9, 305–322 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00849042

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00849042

Key words

Navigation