Summary
The size of the neurogenic region ofDrosophila melanogaster is under the control of several genes of zygotic expression. Lack of function from any of those genes produces an increase of the size of the neurogenic region at the expense of the epidermal anlage. However, differences exist in the extent of neuralisation achieved by each of the genetic loci upon mutation. The present results show that in the case ofN andmam phenotype differences are due to different contributions of maternal gene expression. This could be shown by studying the phenotype which appeared in mutant embryos when the oocytes developed from homozygous mutant precursor cells. Clones of mutant cells were induced in the germ line of females heterozygous for the neurogenic mutationin trans over germ line dependent, dominant female sterile mutations. After removing maternal information the phenotype ofN andmam mutants became identical in both cases. Furthermore maternal information fromN + was found to be necessary for viability of the wildtype.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Davidson EH (1976) Gene activity in early development. Academic Press, New York
Garcia-Bellido A, Moscoso del Prado J (1979) Genetic analysis of maternal information inDrosophila. Nature 278:346–348
Hirsh D, Wood WB, Hecht R, Carr S, Vanderslice R (1977) Expression of genes essential for early development in the nematode,C. elegans. In: Molecular approaches to eucaryotic genetic system, ICN-UCLA Symposia on molecular and cellular biology, vol VIII, pp 347–356
Jiménez F, Campos-Ortega JA (1979) A region of theDrosophila genome necessary for CNS development. Nature 282:310–312
Lehmann R (1981) Untersuchungen an zwei Mutanten der frühen Neurogenese beiDrosophila melanogaster. Diploma Thesis. Universität Freiburg, FRG
Lehmann R, Dietrich U, Jiménez F, Campos-Ortega JA (1981) Mutations of early neurogenesis inDrosophila. Wilhelm Roux's Arch 190:226–229
Lindsley DL, Grell EH (1968) Genetic variations ofDrosophila melanogaster. Carnegie Institute Publ, Washington
Fausto-Sterling A, Weiner AJ, Digan ME (1977) Analysis of a newly isolated temperature sensitive, maternal-effect mutation ofDrosophila melanogaster. J Exp Biol 200:199–210
Meer J van der (1977) Optical clean and permanent wholemount preparation for phase-contrast microscopy of cuticular structures of insect larvae. Dros Inf Serv 52:160
Nüßlein-Volhard C (1977) A rapid method for screening eggs from singleDrosophila females. Dros Inf Serv 52:166
Poulson DF (1937) Chromosomal deficiencies and the embryonic development ofDrosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci 23:133–147
Poulson DF (1940) The effect of certain chromosomal deficiencies on the embryonic development ofDrosophila melanogaster. J Exp Zool 83:271–325
Poulson DF (1968) The embryogenetic function of the Notch locus inDrosophila melanogaster. Proc 12th Int Congr Genetics Tokyo 1:143
Robbins LG (1980) Maternal-zygotic lethal interactions inDrosophila melanogaster: the effect of deficiencies in the zeste-white region of the X-chromosome. Genetics 96:187–200
Shearn A, Hersperger G, Hersperger E (1978) Genetic analysis of two allelic temperature-sensitive mutants ofDrosophila melanogaster both of which are zygotic and maternal-effect lethals. Genetics 89:341–353
Welshons WJ (1965) Analysis of a gene inDrosophila. Science 150:1122–1129
Wieschaus E (1980) A combined genetic and mosaic approach to the study of oogenesis inDrosophila. In: Siddiqi O, Babu P, Hall LM, Hall JC (eds) Development and neurobiology ofDrosophila, Plenum Press, New York, pp 85–94
Wright TRF (1970) The genetics of embryogenesis inDrosophila. Adv Genet 15:262–395
Yarger RG, King RC (1971) The phenogenetics of a temperature-sensitive, autosomal dominant, female sterile gene inDrosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol 24:166–177
Zalokar M, Erk I (1977) Phase-partition fixation and staining ofDrosophila eggs. Stain Technol 52:89–95
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jiménez, F., Campos-Ortega, J.A. Maternal effects of zygotic mutants affecting early neurogenesis inDrosophila . Wilhelm Roux' Archiv 191, 191–201 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00848335
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00848335