Advertisement

Wilhelm Roux's archives of developmental biology

, Volume 179, Issue 4, pp 291–300 | Cite as

Differential responses to ultraviolet irradiation of the polar cytoplasm ofDrosophila eggs: II. Response to dose

  • G. Graziosi
  • R. Marzari
Article

Summary

The posterior pole cytoplasm of early embryos ofDrosophila melanogaster was irradiated with increasing doses of U.V. light at a wave length specific for nucleic acids 35 and 75 min after ovoposition, when nuclei were still inside the yolk mass. Probit analysis showed that:

Sterility was higher in irradiations performed at 35 min.

Mortality was higher in the experiment performed at 75 min.

After treatment at 35 min, sterility and mortality were independent phenomena.

The numbers of targets involved in germ cell determination were of the order of tens and hundreds at 35 and 75 min respectively.

The numbers of targets involved in viability were of several orders of magnitude in both developmental stages.

The irradiation, even at very low doses, caused a background effect which was probably due to “old” embryos. The sex ratio was distorted in favour of females at high doses and of males at low doses.

Keywords

Nucleic Acid Developmental Stage Germ Cell Developmental Biology Wave Length 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aboïm, A. N.: Dévelopement embryonnaire et post-embryonnaire des gonades normales et agamétiques deDrosophila melanogaster. Rev. Suisse Zool.52, 53–154 (1945)Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, D. T.: The comparative embryology of the Diptera. Ann. Rev. Entomology11, 23–46 (1966)Google Scholar
  3. Armitage, P.: Tests for linear trends in proportions and frequencies. Biometrics11, 375–386 (1955)Google Scholar
  4. Audit, C., Gans, M., Masson, M.: Isolation and characterisation of sex linked female sterility mutants inDrosophila melanogaster. (Submitted for publication 1975)Google Scholar
  5. Bownes, M., Kalthoff, K.: Embryonic defects inDrosophila eggs after partial U.V. irradiation at different wavelengths. J. Embryol. exp. Morph.31, 329–345 (1974)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chan, L. N., Gehgring, W.: Determination of blastoderm cells inDrosophila melanogaster J. Exp. Zool.161, 221–242 (1971)Google Scholar
  7. Colaianne, J. J., Bell, A. E.: Sonless, a sex-ratio anomaly inDrosophila melanogaster resulting from a gene-cytoplasm interaction. Genetics65, 619–625 (1970)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dertinger, H., Jung, H.: Molecular radiation biology. Heidelberg Sci. Libr. Vol. 12, London 1970Google Scholar
  9. Fisher, R. A., Yates, F.: Statistical tables for biological, agricultural and medical research. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd Ltd. 1963Google Scholar
  10. Geigy, R.: Action de l'ultra-violet sur le pole germinal dans l'oeuf deDrosophila melanogaster (castration et mutabilite). Rev. Suisse Zool.38, 187–288 (1931)Google Scholar
  11. Ghelelovitch, S.: La sensibilité des oeufs de la Drosophile (Drosophila melanogaster, Meig.) à l'action létale des rayons ultra-violets. I. Evolution de la sensibilité avec l'age de l'embryon. Int. J. Rad. Biol.11, 225–271 (1966)Google Scholar
  12. Graziosi, G., Micali, F.: Differential responses to ultraviolet irradiation of the polar cytoplasm ofDrosophila egg. Wilhelm Roux' Arch.175, 1–11 (1974)Google Scholar
  13. Graziosi, G., Roberts, D. B.: Molecular anisotrophy of earlyDrosophila embryo. Nature258, 157–159 (1975)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hathaway, D. S., Selman, G. G.: Certain aspects of cell lineage and morphogenes studied in embryos ofDrosophila melanogaster with an ultraviolet micro-beam. J. Embryol. exp. Morph.9, 310–325 (1961)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Herth, W., Sander, K.: Mode and timing of body pattern formation (regionalisation) in the early embryonic development of Cyclorrhaphic Dipterans (Protophormia, Drosophila). Wilhelm Roux' Archiv172, 1–27 (1973)Google Scholar
  16. Huettner, R. W.: The origin of germ cells inDrosophila melanogaster. J. Morph.37, 385–423 (1923)Google Scholar
  17. Illmensee, K., Mahowald, A. P.: Transplantation of posterior polar plasm inDrosophila. Induction of germ cells at the anterior pole of the egg. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)71, 1016–1020 (1974)Google Scholar
  18. Illmensee, K., Mahowald, A. P.: The autonomous function of germ plasm in somatic region of theDrosophila egg. Exp. Cell Res. (in press)Google Scholar
  19. Jura, Cz.: Cytological and experimental observations on the origin and fate of the pole cells inDrosophila virilis Sturt. Part II. Experimental analysis. Acta Biol. Crac. Zool.7, 89–103 (1964)Google Scholar
  20. Kalthoff, K.: Position of targets and period of competence for UV-induction of the malformation “Double Abdomen” in the egg ofSmittia spec. (Diptera, Chironomidae). Wilhelm Roux' Arch.168, 63–84 (1971)Google Scholar
  21. Levin, V. L.: Chans in the UV sensitivity in the embryo-genesis ofDrosophila. Tsitologiya13, 212–220 (1971)Google Scholar
  22. Lison, L.: Statistica applicata alla biologia sperimental. Milano, Casa Editrice Ambrosiana 1961Google Scholar
  23. Mahowald, A. P.: Polar granules ofDrosophila. IV. Cytochemical studies showing loss of RNA from polar granules during early stages of embryogenesis. J. Exp. Zool.176, 345–352 (1971)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Moreno, F.: Contribution a l'étude de la létalité et de la stérilité induites chezDrosophila melanogaster par irradiation U.V. des cellules polaires de l'oeuf. II. Action sterilisante. Int. J. Radiat. Biol.16, 451–465 (1969)Google Scholar
  25. Poulson, D. F.: Histogenesis, organogenesis and differentiation in the embryo ofDrosophila melanogaster Meigen. In: “The Biology of Drosophila”. Ch. 3. M. Demerec (ed). New York: John Wiley and Sons 1950Google Scholar
  26. Poulson, D. F., Waterhouse, D. F.: Experimental studies on pole cells and midgut differentiation in Diptera. Aust. J. biol. Sci.13, 541–567 (1960)Google Scholar
  27. Prudhommeau, C., Lauge, G.: Irradiation UV des cellules polaires de l'oeuf chezDrosophila melanogaster. II. Estimation du nombre des cellules polaires à l'origine de la lignée germinale. Mutation Res.14, 43–52 (1972)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Okada M., Kleinman, F. A., Schneiderman, H. A.: Restoration of fertility in sterilisedDrosophila eggs by transplantation of polar cytoplasm. Develop. Biol.37, 43–54 (1974)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Snedecor, G. W., Cochran, W. G.: Statistical methods. Sixth ed. Ames, The Iowa State College Press 1976Google Scholar
  30. Warn, R.: Restoration of fertility in UV irradiatedDrosophila embryos by injection of posterior pole plasm. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. (in press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Graziosi
    • 1
  • R. Marzari
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto di Zoologia e Anatomia ComparataUniversità di TriesteTriesteItala

Personalised recommendations