Summary
-
1.
Right fore-leg buds and right hind-leg buds ofXenopus larvae in the developmental stages 48, 49, and 50 were grafted into an epidermal “pocket” next to the right hind-leg bud (heterotopic) in hosts of the same age.
-
2.
The grafts develop “herkunftsgemäß” to normal fore- and hind limbs.
-
3.
The grafts are also able to develop double limbs. The symmetry of the limbs follows Bateson's rule.
-
4.
In addition to a grafted fore- or hind-leg bud, a supernumerary fore- or hind-leg bud is able to develop. After duplication of the grafts, correspondingly two supernumerary limb buds develop.
-
5.
The supernumerary limbs are orientated as mirror images to the grafts or double limbs and follow also Bateson's rule.
-
6.
The condition for the growth of the supernumerary limb buds is apparently the direct contact of the grafts' plane of amputation to the overlying epidermal “pocket” tissue. In the area of contact the epidermal “pocket” tissue grows and takes part in the formation of the supernumerary limb.
-
7.
In one case, a supernumerary hind-limb exhibits uncoordinated movement. The innervation of this limb is supplied by a branch of the spinal nerve S8.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Andres, G., Bretscher, A., Lehmann, F. E., Roth, D.: Einige Verbesserungen in der Haltung und Aufzucht vonXenopus laevis. Experientia5, 1–3 (1948)
Balinsky, B. I.: Transplantation des Ohrbläschens bei Triton. Wilhelm Roux' Archiv105, 718–731 (1925)
Balinsky, B. I.: New experiments on the mode of action of the limb inductor. J. exp. Zool.134, 239–268 (1957)
Balinsky, B.I.: Supernumerary limb induction in theAnura. J. exp. Zool.188, 195–201 (1974)
Bateson, W.: Materials for the study of variation. London 1894
Braus, H.: Experimentelle Beiträge zur Frage nach der Entwicklung peripherer Nerven. Anat. Anz.26, 433–479 (1905)
Harrison, R. G.: On relations of symmetry in transplanted limbs. J. exp. Zool.32, 1–136 (1921)
Korschelt, E.: Regeneration und Transplantation. I. Regeneration. Berlin: Verlag von Gebrüder Borntraeger 1927
Korschelt, E.: Regeneration und Transplantation. II. Transplantation. Berlin: Verlag von Gebrüder Borntraeger 1931
Lamp, A. H.: The timing of the earliest motor innervation to the hind limb bud in theXenopus tadpole. Brain Res.67, 527–530 (1974)
Michael, M. I., Faber, J.: The self-differentiation of the paddle-shaped limb regenerate, transplanted with normal and reversed proximo-distal orientation after removal of the digital plate (Ambystoma mexicanum). Arch. Biol. (Liège)72, 301–330 (1961)
Nieuwkoop, P.D., Faber, J.: Normal table ofXenopus laevis (Daudin), 2nd ed. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publ. Co. 1967
Ochsé, W.: Die Zucht des südafrikanischen KrallenfroschesXenopus laevis. Gynaecologia120, 57–77 (1948)
Przibram, H.: Die Bruch-Dreifachbildung im Tierreiche. Wilhelm Roux' Archiv48, 205–444 (1921)
Ruben, L. N., Stevens, J. M.: Post-embryonic induction in Urodele limbs. J. Morph.112, 279–302 (1963)
Rugh, R.: Experimental embryology, 3rd ed. Minneapolis: Burgess Publ. Co. 1962
Thornton, C.S.: Amphibian limb regeneration. In: Advanc. Morphogenes.7, 205–249 (1968)
Tornier, G.: An Knoblauchskröten experimentell entstandene überzählige Hintergliedmaßen. Wilhelm Roux' Archiv20, 76–124 (1906)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kleinebeckel, D. Die Entstehung überzähliger Extermitäten nach Transplantation von Beinanlagen beiXenopus laevis . Wilhelm Roux' Archiv 178, 321–331 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00848067
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00848067