Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 359–379 | Cite as

The effects of scheduling format and booster sessions on a broad-spectrum psychosocial approach to smoking prevention

  • Gilbert J. Botvin
  • Nancy L. Renick
  • Eli Baker


The effectiveness of a fifteen session psychosocial smoking prevention strategy was tested on 902 seventh graders from seven junior high schools in suburban New York over 2 years. The prevention program was implemented by regular classroom teachers and consisted of a cognitive component dealing with the immediate consequences of cigarette smoking, a decision-making component, a relaxation-training component, a social skills training component, and a self-improvement component. In addition to testing the overall effectiveness of this approach, the relative efficacy of two different scheduling formats was compared and the extent to which “booster” sessions conducted during the year after completion of the program helped to maintain reductions in new smoking was also examined. Results indicated that the prevention program was able to reduce new cigarette smoking by 50% at the end of the first year and by 55% at the end of the second year for the intensive format condition. New regular cigarette smoking was reduced by 87% in the second year for the students in the booster condition. Significant changes consistent with nonsmoking were also evident on several cognitive, attitudinal, and personality variables.

Key words

attitudes booster sessions cigarette smoking cognition personality prevention 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bandura, A. (1969).Principals of Behavior Modification, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Botvin, G. J. (1982). Broadening the focus of smoking prevention strategies. In Coates, T., Peterson, A., and Perry, C. (eds.),Promoting Adolescent Health: A Dialog on Research and Practice, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Botvin, G. J. (in press). Improving personal competence: Toward a comprehensive approach to smoking prevention. In Lippert, P.,et al. (eds.),Health Promotion in Youth: Problems and Perspectives, Dietrich Reiner Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  4. Botvin, G. J., and Eng, A. (1980a).Life Skills Training: Teacher's Manual, Smithfield Press, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Botvin, G. J., and Eng, A. (1980b). A comprehensive school-based smoking prevention program.J. School Health 50: 209–213.Google Scholar
  6. Botvin, G. J., and Eng, A. (1982). The efficacy of a multi-component approach to the prevention of cigarette smoking.Prevent. Med. 11: 199–211.Google Scholar
  7. Botvin, G. J., Eng, A., and Williams, C. (1980). Preventing the onset of cigarette smoking through Life Skills Training.Prevent. Med. 9: 135–143.Google Scholar
  8. Evans, R. I., Hansen, W. B., and Mittlemark, M. B. (1977). Increasing the validity of self-reports of behavior in a smoking in children investigation.J. Appl. Psychol. 62: 521–523.Google Scholar
  9. Evans, R. I., Rozelle, R. M., Mittlemark, M. B., Hanson, W. B., Bane, A. L., and Havis, J. (1978). Deterring the onset of smoking in children: Knowledge of immediate physiological effects and coping with peer pressure, media pressure, and parent modeling.J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 8: 126–135.Google Scholar
  10. Evans, R. I., Henderson, A. H., Hill, P. C., and Raines, B. E. (1979). Current psychological, social, and education programs in control and prevention of smoking: A critical methodological review.Atheroscler. Rev. 6: 203–243.Google Scholar
  11. Evans, R. I., Rozelle, R. M., Maxwell, S. E., Raines, B. E., Dill, C. A., Guthrie, T. J., Henderson, A. H., and Hill, P. C. (1981). Social modeling films to deter smoking in adolescents: Results of a three-year field investigation.J. Appl. Psychol. 66(4): 339–414.Google Scholar
  12. Gambrill, E. D., and Richey, C. A. (1975). An assertion inventory for use in assessment and research.Behav. Ther. 6: 550–561.Google Scholar
  13. Hurd, P., Johnson, C. A., Pechacek, T., Bast, C. P., Jacobs, D., and Luepker, R. (1980). Prevention of cigarette smoking in 7th grade students.J. Behav. Med. 3: 15–28.Google Scholar
  14. McAlister, A., Perry, C., and Maccoby, N. (1979). Adolescent smoking: Onset and prevention.Pediatrics 63: 650–658.Google Scholar
  15. McAlister, A., Perry, C. L., Killen, J., Slinkard, L. A., and Maccoby, N. (1980). Pilot study of smoking, alcohol, and drug abuse prevention.Am. J. Public Health 70: 719–721.Google Scholar
  16. Murray, D. M., Johnson, C. A., Luepker, R. V., Pechacek, T. F., Jacobs, D. R., and Hurd, P. (1979). Social factors in the prevention of smoking in seventh grade students: A follow-up experience of one year. Presented at the 87th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York, September 1–5.Google Scholar
  17. Overall, J. E. (1980). Calculation of adjusted response frequencies using least squares regression methods.Appl. Psychol. Measure. 4: 65–78.Google Scholar
  18. Schlegel, R. P., and DiTecco, D. (1978). Mediational adequacy of the Fishbein model under conditions of varying behavioral complexity. Unpublished manuscript. (Available from R. P. Schlegel, Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.)Google Scholar
  19. Thompson, E. L. (1978). Smoking education programs.Am. J. Pub. Health 68: 247–250.Google Scholar
  20. U.S. Public Health Service (1979).Smoking and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General, Chapter 17, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  21. U.S. Public Health Service (1974).Teenager's Self-Test: Cigarette Smoking, Bureau of Health Education, Center for Disease Control, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  22. Wells, L., and Marwell, G. (1976).Self-Esteem: Its Conceptualization and Measurement, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gilbert J. Botvin
    • 1
  • Nancy L. Renick
    • 1
  • Eli Baker
    • 1
  1. 1.Cornell University Medical CollegeNew York

Personalised recommendations