Skip to main content
Log in

Keeping in touch: Ecological factors related to foster care visitation

  • Articles
  • Published:
Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Visitation, assumed to be important for children in foster care, has not been studied in sufficent detail. In the present study, patterns and characteristics of home and foster family visitation and telephone contact are described in a national sample of children in foster care in Israel (n=590). Relations between child, biological and foster family characteristics are explored by type of contact and foster placement. Parent-child contact is most strongly related to foster family characteristics and relations with the biological family. Patterns differ for relative and nonrelative foster families.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ben-Rabi, D. (1990) Children in Israel — Family background. Masters Thesis. School of Social Work, Hebrew University.

  • Benbenishty, R. & Oyserman, D. (1990). Assessment of foster families. Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

  • Benbenishty, R., & Oyserman, D. (1991). A clinical information system for foster care in Israel.Child Welfare, LXX(2), 229–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benbenishty, R., Oyserman, D., & Ben-Rabi, D. (1990). The clinical situation of children in foster care in Israel: Findings from the clinical monitoring system. Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cautley, P. W. (1980).New foster parents. New York: Human Sciences Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dando, I. & Minty, B. (1987). What makes good foster parents.British Journal of Social Work, 17, 383–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes, C. (1988). Foster families for adolescents: The healing potential of time-limited placements.British Journal of Social Work, 18, 473–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanshel, D. (1975). Parental visiting in foster care: Key to discharge.Social Service Review, 49, 493–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanshel, D. (1978).Computerized information for child welfare: The availability and capacities of children in foster care for services involvement. NY: Columbia Univ School of Social Work.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanshel, D. & Shinn, E. (1978).Children in foster care. New York: Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fein, E., Maluccio, A. N., Hamilton, V. J., & Ward, D. E. (1983). Descriptions and comparisons of children in each type of permanent home.Child Welfare, 62(6), 524–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, S., Fanshel, D. & Grundy, (1986). Factors associated with the discharge of children from foster care.Social Work Research and Abstracts, 22(1), 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goerge, R. M. (1990). The reunification process in substitute care.Social Service Review. 64(3), 422–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, C. D. (1987).Risking the future: Adolescent sexuality, pregnancy, and childrearing, (Vol. 1), Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, P. (1988). Case and context: Determinants of planned visit frequency in foster family care.Child Welfare, 87(3), 311–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, S. (1967). Duration of foster care: Some relevant antecedent variables.Child Welfare, 46, 450–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadushin, A. & Martin, J. (1988).Child Welfare Services, 4th Edition. NY: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagitcibasi, C., & Berry, J. (1989). Cross-cultural psychology: Current research and trends.Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 493–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawder, E. A., Poulin, J. E., & Andrews, R. G. (1985).185 foster children five years after placement. Philadelphia, Pa.: Research Center, Children's Aid Society of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas, H. (1969). Children in long-term foster care.Child Welfare, 48, 321–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, A., Lounsbury, K. R., Berntson, D., & Steel, H. (1988). Psychosocial characteristics of foster children.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 125–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, J. L. (1987). An ecological perspective on duration of foster care.Child Welfare, LXVI(2, March–April), 113–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyserman, D., Benbenishty, R., & Ben-Rabi, D. (1992). Monitoring foster care in Israel: Characteristics of Children and their families at entry into foster care.Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 22(3), 199–211.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Proch, K. & Howard, J. A. (May–June 1986). Parental visiting of children in foster care.Social Work, 31(3), 178–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radin, N., Benn, R., & Oyserman, D. (1991). The influence of grandfathers on the young children of teen mothers. In P. K. Smith (Ed.),The psychology of grandparenthood: An international perspective. UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J. Cain, H., Hundleby, M., & Keane, A. (1984).Long-term foster care. London: Batsford Academic and Educational.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaberg, J. R. & Tolley, E. S. (1986). Predictors of the length of stay in foster care.Social Work Research and Abstracts, 22(3), 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, R. B. (1982) Foster care in retrospect,Tulane Studies in Social Welfare.14. New Orleans, Tulane University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dr. Oyserman is on sabbatical leave

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oyserman, D., Benbenishty, R. Keeping in touch: Ecological factors related to foster care visitation. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 9, 541–554 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00845413

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00845413

Keywords

Navigation