Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 53–62 | Cite as

Prevention of cigarette smoking: Three-year follow-up of an education program for youth

  • Russell V. Luepker
  • C. Anderson Johnson
  • David M. Murray
  • Terry F. Pechacek


We reported previously on the success of an innovative approach to cigarette smoking prevention in seventh-grade students. The present report describes a 3-year follow-up of three schools and 1081 sutdents initially involved in the research program. The curriculum emphasizes the shortterm influences which affect smoking in youth, particularly social and peer influences. In the school which received this curriculum from likeaged peer leaders, the incidence of smoking remained low compared to that in a control school. Those who did smoke in this school consumed significantly fewer cigarettes. In the school where the curriculum was adult taught, smoking rates were initially lower but rose in the later years, ultimately differing little from those in the control school. Reported smoking behavior was confirmed by saliva ihiocyanate measurement in all students. Cigarette smoking behavior appears significantly inhibited by a peer-taught curriculum and that effect is retained for several years after the education program.

Key words

adolescent smoking cigarettes health education smoking prevention thiocyanates 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arkin, R. M., Roehmild, H. F., Johnson, C. A., Luepker, R. V., and Murray, D. M. (1981). The Minnesota Smoking Prevention Program.J. School Health 51: 611–616.Google Scholar
  2. Botvin, G. J., Eng, A., and Williams, C. L. (1980). Preventing the onset of cigarette smoking through life skills training.Prevent. Med. 9: 130–136.Google Scholar
  3. Evans, R. I., Rozelle, R. M., Mittelmark, M. al. (1978). Deterring the onset of smoking in children: Knowledge of immediate physiological effects and coping with peer pressure, media pressure, and parent modeling.J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 8: 126–135.Google Scholar
  4. Hurd, P. D., Johnson, C. A., Pechacek, T. F., Bast, C. P., Jacobs, D. R., and Luepker, R. V. (1980). Prevention of cigarette smoking in seventh grade students.J. Behav. Med. 3: 15–28.Google Scholar
  5. Jones, J. A., Piper, G. W., and Matthews, V. L. (1970). A student directed program in smoking education.Can. J. Pub. Health 61: 253–258.Google Scholar
  6. Luepker, R. V., Pechacek, T. F., Murray, D. M., Johnson, C. A., Hund, F., and Jacobs, D. R. (1981). Saliva thiocyanate: A chemical indicator of cigarette smoking in adolescents.Am. J. Pub. Health 71: 1320–1324.Google Scholar
  7. McAlister, A., Perry, C., and Maccoby, N. (1979). Adolescent smoking: Onset and prevention.Pediatrics 63: 650–658.Google Scholar
  8. Murray, D. M., Luepker, R. V., Johnson, C. A., Pechacek, T. F., and Jacobs, D. R. (1979). Prevention of cigarette smoking in teenagers.Circulation 60 (Suppl. II): 126.Google Scholar
  9. Perry, C. L., Maccoby, N., and McAlister, A. L. (1980). Adolescent smoking prevention: A third year follow-up.World Smoking Health Autumn: 41–45.Google Scholar
  10. Piper, G. W., Jones, J. A., and Matthews, V. L. (1974). The Saskatoon Smoking Project: Results of the second year.Can. J. Pub. Health 65: 127–129.Google Scholar
  11. Russell, M. A. H. (1971). Cigarette smoking: Natural history of a dependence disorder.Br. J. Med. Psychol. 44: 1–16.Google Scholar
  12. Telch, M. J., Killen, J. D., McAlister, A. L., Perry, C. L., and Maccoby, N. (1982). Longterm follow-up of a pilot project on smoking prevention with adolescents.J. Behav. Med. 5: 1–8.Google Scholar
  13. Thompson, E. L. (1978). Smoking education programs 1960-76.Am. J. Pub. Health 68: 250–257.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Russell V. Luepker
    • 1
  • C. Anderson Johnson
    • 2
  • David M. Murray
    • 1
  • Terry F. Pechacek
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Physiological Hygiene, School of Public Health, Stadium Gate 27University of MinnesotaMinneapolis
  2. 2.Laboratory for Health Behavior Studies, School of PharmacyUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos Angeles

Personalised recommendations