Advertisement

Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 61–73 | Cite as

A daily stress inventory: Development, reliability, and validity

  • Phillip J. Brantley
  • Craig D. Waggoner
  • Glenn N. Jones
  • Neil B. Rappaport
Article

Abstract

This article describes the development of the Daily Stress Inventory, a measure introduced to provide researchers and clinicians with a psychometrically sound self-report instrument for the daily assessment of the sources and individualized impact of relatively minor stressful events. It was designed to assess sources of stress not typically assessed by major life-event scales. Generalizability coefficients indicate that the scale has significant homogeneity and a useful degree of stability. Several studies investigating the concurrent and construct validities suggest that the scale measures the construct commonly referred to as “stress”. Implications for uses in theoretical and basic research as well as clinical assessment are discussed.

Key words

stress inventory life events daily anxiety 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Psychiatrie Association (1980).Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed., American Psychiatrie Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  2. Anastasi, A. (1976).Psychological Testing, 4th ed., Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Bradley, C. (1980). Sex differences in reporting and rating of life events: A comparison of diabetic and healthy subjects.J. Psychosom. Res. 24: 35–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, G. W. (1981). Life events, psychiatric disorder and physical illness.J. Psychosom. Res. 25: 461–473.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, D. T., and Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychol. Bull. 56: 81–105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cleary, P. J. (1980). A checklist for life events research.J. Psychosom. Res. 24: 199–207.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Delongis, A., Coyne, J. C., Dakof, G., Folkman, S., and Lazarus, R. S. (1982). Relationship of daily hassles, uplifts, and major life events to health status.Health Psychol. 1(2): 119–136.Google Scholar
  8. Dohrenwend, B. S., and Dohrenwend, B. P. (1978). Some issues in research on stressful life events.J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 106: 7–15.Google Scholar
  9. Dohrenwend, B. P., and Shrout, P. E. (1985). “Hassles” in the conceptualization and measurement of life stress variables.Am. Psychol. 40: 780–785.Google Scholar
  10. Endler, N. S. (1975). A person-situation interaction model of anxiety. In Spielberger, C. D., and Sarason, I. G. (eds.),Stress and Anxiety, Vol. 1, Hemisphere, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  11. Endler, N. S. (1980). Person-situation interaction and anxiety. In Kutash, I. L., and Schlesinger, L. B. (eds.),Handbook on Stress and Anxiety: Contemporary Knowledge, Theory, and Treatment, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  12. Endler, N. S., and Edwards, J. (1982). Stress and personality. In Goldberg, L., and Breznitz, S. (eds.),Handbook of Stress, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Hawkins, N. C., Davies, R., and Holmes, T. H. (1957). Evidence of psychosocial factors in the development of pulmonary tuberculosis.Am. Rev. Tuberc. Pulmon. Disord. 75: 768–780.Google Scholar
  14. Holmes, T. H., and Rahe, R. H. (1967). The social readjustment rating scale.J. Psychosom. Res. 11: 213–218.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Horowitz, M., Schaefer, C., Hiroto, D., Wilmer, N., and Levin, B. (1977). Life events questionnaires for measuring presumptive stress.Psychosom. Med. 39(6): 413–431.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kanner, A. D., Coyne, J. C., Schaefer, C., and Lazarus, R. S. (1981). Comparison of two modes of stress measurement: Daily hassles and uplifts versus major life events.J. Behav. Med. 4: 1–39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lazarus, R. S. (1984). Puzzles in the study of daily hassles.J. Behav. Med. 7: 375–389.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lazarus, R. S., DeLongis, A., Folkman, S., and Gruen, R. (1985). Stress and adaptational outcomes: The problem of confounded measures.Am. Psychol. 40: 770–779.Google Scholar
  19. Lei, H., and Skinner, H. S. (1980). A psychometric study of life events and social readjustment.J. Psychosom. Res. 24: 57–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. May, R. (1977).The Meaning of Anxiety, Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Pearlin, L. I. (1982). The social contexts of stress. In Goldberger, L., and Brenznitz, S. (eds.),Handbook of Stress, Free Press, New York, pp. 367–379.Google Scholar
  22. Perkins, D. V. (1982). The assessment of stress using life events scales. In Goldberger, L., and Brenznitz, S. (eds.),Handbook of Stress, Free Press, New York, pp. 320–331.Google Scholar
  23. Rabkin, J. G., and Struening, E. L. (1976). Life events, stress and illness.Science 194: 1013–1020.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sattler, J. M. (1982).Assessment of Children's Intelligence and Special Abilities, 2nd ed., Allyn and Bacon, Boston.Google Scholar
  25. Spielberger, C. D. (1979).Understanding Stress and Anxiety, Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., and Lushene, R. E. (1970).Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Consulting Psychologist Press, Palo Alto, Calif.Google Scholar
  27. Zuckerman, M., and Lubin, B. (1965).Manual for the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List, Educational and Industrial Testing Service, San Diego, Calif.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Phillip J. Brantley
    • 1
    • 2
  • Craig D. Waggoner
    • 1
  • Glenn N. Jones
    • 1
  • Neil B. Rappaport
    • 1
  1. 1.Louisiana State UniversityBaton RougeLouisiana
  2. 2.Louisiana State University Medical CenterBaton RougeLouisiana

Personalised recommendations