Advertisement

Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 147–161 | Cite as

Restricted environmental stimulation therapy in a weight reduction program

  • Roderick A. Borrie
  • Peter Suedfeld
Article

Abstract

Forty-eight female volunteers, between the ages of 20 and 55 years and at least 25% overweight, participated in a weight reduction program. The program factorially varied 24 hr of restricted environmental stimulation (lying on a bed in a dark, silent room) and a set of self-management messages. The combined treatment was significantly more effective than the other three conditions during a 6 month follow-up period; the mean weight loss during the first 2 months was primarily a function of the messages, while the reduced stimulation environment effect became dominant during the last 4 months of followup.

Key words

weight reduction program obesity restricted environmental stimulation therapy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, H. B., Robertson, M. H., and Cooper, G. D. (1966). Sensory deprivation and personality change.J. Nerv. Mem. Dis. 143: 256–265.Google Scholar
  2. Azima, H., and Cramer-Azima, F. J. (1956). Effects of partial perceptual isolation in mentally disturbed individuals.Dis. Nerv. System 17: 117–122.Google Scholar
  3. Barber, T. X. (1965). Measuring “hypnotic-like” suggestibility with and without “hypnotic induction.” Psychometric properties, norms and variables influencing response to the Barber Suggestibility Scale.Psychol. Rep. 10: 809–844.Google Scholar
  4. Barnes, L. J. (1976).Comparative Effectiveness of a Five Day Plan and a Sensory Deprivation Program on Reduction and Abstinence from Cigarette Smoking, unpublished Master's thesis, Dalhousie University.Google Scholar
  5. Best, J. A., and Suedfeld, P. (1980). Restricted environmental stimulation therapy and behavioral self-management in smoking cessation (in preparation).Google Scholar
  6. Cleveland, S. E., Reitman, E. E., and Bentinck, C. (1963). Therapeutic effectiveness of sensory deprivation.Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 8: 455–460.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper, G. D., Adams, H. B., and Cohen, L. D. (1965). Changes in personality after sensory deprivation.J Nerv. Ment. Dis. 140: 103–118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gibby, R. G., and Adams, H. B. (1961). Receptiveness of psychiatric patients to verbal communication: An increase following partial sensory and social isolation.Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 5: 366–379.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kammerman, M. (1977). Personality changes resulting from water-suspension sensory isolation. In Kammerman, M. (ed.),Sensory Isolation and Personality Change, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, Ill.Google Scholar
  10. Maier, W. J. (1970). Sensory deprivation therapy of an autistic boy.Am. J. Psychother. 25: 228–245.Google Scholar
  11. Mandler, G., Mandler, J. M., and Uvillar, E. T. (1958). Autonomic feedback: The perception of autonomic activity.J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 56: 367–373.Google Scholar
  12. Martin, D. G., Rousch, P., and Nicholson, J. V. (1967). Increased effect of a visual training procedure after sensory restriction.Psychonom. Sci. 8: 229–230.Google Scholar
  13. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (1959). New weight standards for men and women.Stat. Bull. 40: 1–4.Google Scholar
  14. Patrick, R. O. (1965). Partial sensory depatterning and propaganda assimilation.Dissert. Abstr. Int. 26: 3488–3489.Google Scholar
  15. Peevers, B. H., Blascovich, J. I., and Secord, P. F. (1974). The Personal Causality Questionnaire.JSAS Cat. Selected Documents Psychol. 4: 15.Google Scholar
  16. Reid, D. W., and Ware, E. E. (1974). Multidimensionality of internal versus external control: Addition of a third dimension and non distinction of self versus others.Can. J. Behav. Sci. 6: 131–142.Google Scholar
  17. Reitman, E. E., and Cleveland, S. E. (1964). Change in body image following sensory deprivation in schizophrenic and control groups.J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 68: 168–176.Google Scholar
  18. Robertson, M. (1965). Therapeutic effectiveness of verbal communication under conditions of perceptual isolation.Am. Psychol. 20: 548 (abstr.).Google Scholar
  19. Schechter, M. D., Shurley, J. T., Sexauer, J. D., and Toussieng, P. W. (1969). Perceptual isolation therapy: A new approach in the treatment of children using autistic defenses. A preliminary report.J. Am. Acad. Child Psychiat. 8: 97–139.Google Scholar
  20. Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 30: 526–537.Google Scholar
  21. Stuart, R. B. (1967). Behavioral control of overeating.Behav. Res. Ther. 5: 357–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stuart, R. B. (1971). A three-dimensional program for the treatment of obesity.Behav. Res. Ther. 9: 177–186.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Stuart, R. B., and Davis, B. (1972).Slim Chance in a Fat World: Behavioral Control of Obesity, Research Press, Champaign, Ill.Google Scholar
  24. Stunkard, A. J. (1975). From explanation to action in psychosomatic medicine: The case of obesity.Psychosom. Med. 37: 195–236.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Stunkard, A. J., and McLaren-Hume, M. (1959). The results of treatment for obesity.Arch. Intern. Med. 103: 79–85.Google Scholar
  26. Suedfeld, P. (1975). The clinical relevance of reduced sensory stimulation.Can. Psychol. Rev. 16: 88–103.Google Scholar
  27. Suedfeld, P. (1977). Using environmental restriction to initiate long-term behavioral change. In Stuart, R. B. (ed.),Behavioral Self-Management: Strategies, Techniques and Outcomes, Brunner/Mazel, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Suedfeld, P. (1980).Restricted Environmental Stimulation: Research and Clinical Applications, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Suedfeld, P., and Best, J. A. (1977). Satiation and sensory deprivation combined in smoking therapy: Some case studies and unexpected side-effects.Int. J. Addict. 12: 337–359.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Suedfeld, P., and Buchanan, E. (1974). Sensory deprivation and autocontrolled aversive stimulation in the reduction of snake avoidance.Can. J. Behav. Sci. 6: 105–111.Google Scholar
  31. Suedfeld, P., and Hare, R. D. (1977). Sensory deprivation in the treatment of snake phobia: Behavioral, self-report and physiological effects.Behav. Ther. 8: 240–250.Google Scholar
  32. Suedfeld, P., and Ikard, F. F. (1973). Attitude manipulation in restricted environments. IV. Psychologically addicted smokers treated in sensory deprivation.Br. J. Addict. 68: 170–176.Google Scholar
  33. Suedfeld, P., and Ikard, F. F. (1974). The use of sensory deprivation in facilitating the reduction of cigarette smoking.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 42: 888–895.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Suedfeld, P., Landon, P. B., Pargament, R., and Epstein, Y. M. (1972). An experimental attack on smoking (Attitude manipulation in restricted environments, III).Int. J. Addict. 7: 721–731.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Suedfeld, P., and Smith, C. A. (1973). Positive incentive value of phobic stimuli after brief sensory deprivation: Preliminary report.Percept Motor Skills 36: 320.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Witkin, H. A., Lewis, H. B., Hertzman, M., Machover, K., Meissner, P. B., and Wagner, S. (1954).Personality Through Perception, Harper, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roderick A. Borrie
    • 1
  • Peter Suedfeld
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations