Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 257–276 | Cite as

An analysis of relationships among environmental noise, annoyance and sensitivity to noise, and the consequences for health and sleep

  • Mary Ellen Nivison
  • Inger M. Endresen


The complex relationship among long-term exposure to environmental noise, self-reports of health, and sleep was investigated in a multifactorial design. Forty-seven women and 35 men living beside a street with moderate to heavy traffic took part. They answered questions concerning health complaints, usual sleep patterns, sleep the actual week of testing, their subjective responses to noise, psychosocial relations, anxiety, stressful life events, type A behavior, and attitudinal factors that could explain their responses to noise. No detrimental relations among objective noise levels, health, and sleep could be shown. There were, however, strong correlations between the subjective noise responses of annoyance and sensitivity and health complaints. Only women revealed a relationship between poor sleep quality and sensitivity. The stronger relationship among noise sensitivity, health complaints, and poor sleep quality for women than for men could be explained by the degree of exposure to noise as evidenced by their longer residence and greater time spent at home.

Key words

environment annoyance noise sensitivity health sleep 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Babisch, W., Ising, H., Gallacher, J. E. J., and Elwood, P. C. (1988). Traffic noise and cardiovascular risk. The Caerphilly study, first phase. Outdoor noise levels and risk factors.Arch. Environ. Health 43: 407–414.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bortner, R. W. (1969). A short rating scale as a potential measure of pattern A behavior.J. Chron. Dis. 22: 87–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradley, J. S., and Jonah, B. A. (1979). The effects of site selected variables on human responses to traffic noise. I. Type of housing by traffic noise level.J. Sound Vibrat. 66: 589–604.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, S., Evans, G. W., Stokols, D., and Krantz, D. S. (1986).Behavior, Health, and Environmental Stress, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Griffiths, I. D., and Delauzun, F. R. (1977). Individual differences in sensitivity to traffic noise: An empirical study.J. Sound Vibrat. 55: 93–107.Google Scholar
  6. Griffiths, I. D., Langdon, F. J., and Swan, M. A. (1980). Subjective effects of traffic noise exposure: Reliability and seasonal effects.J. Sound Vibrat. 71: 227–240.Google Scholar
  7. Holmes, T. H., and Rahe, R. H. (1967). The Social Readjustment Rating Scale.J. Psychosom. Res. 11: 213–218.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Jonah, B. A. Bradley, J. S., and Dawson, N. E. (1981). Predicting individual subjective responses to traffic noise.J. Appl. Psychol. 66: 490–501.Google Scholar
  9. Knipschild, P., and Sallé, H. (1979). Road traffic noise and cardiovascular disease.Int. Arch. Occupat. Environ. Health 44: 55–59.Google Scholar
  10. Langdon, F. J., and Griffiths, I. D. (1982). Subjective effects of traffic noise exposure. II. Comparisons of noise indices, response scales, and the effects of changes in noise levels.J. Sound Vibrat. 83: 171–180.Google Scholar
  11. Langdon, J. (1987). Some residual problems in noise nuisance: A brief review. In Koelega, H. S. (ed.),Environmental Annoyance: Characterization, Measurement, and Control, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  12. Neus, H., Ruddel, H., and Schulte, W. (1983). Traffic noise and hypertension. An epidemiological study of the role of subjective reactions.Int. Arch. Environ. Health 51: 223–229.Google Scholar
  13. Nivison, M. E., and Nordby, H. (1992). The effects of interstimulus interval length on short and long-term habituation of psychophysiological responses and on self-reported arousal (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  14. Nivison, M. E., Nordby, H., and Gjestland, T. (1987). The effects of length of interstimulus interval on psychophysiological responses and on self-reported arousal.J. Sound Vibrat. 116: 169–180.Google Scholar
  15. Nivison, M. E., Hjorthol, R., and Kolbenstvedt, M. (1992). The relationship between traffic noise, subjective responses to noise, self-reported health complaints, and sleep quality in a large sample (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  16. Raw, G. J., and Griffiths, I. D. (1988). Individual differences in response to road traffic noise.J. Sound Vibrat. 121:; 463–471.Google Scholar
  17. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., and Lushene, R. E. (1970).STAI Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Consulting Psychologists' Press, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  18. SPSS (1983).SPSS-X User's Guide, SPSS.Google Scholar
  19. Stansfeld, S. A., Clark, C. R., Jenkins, L. M., and Tarnopolsky, A. (1985). Sensitivity to noise in a community sample. I. Measurement of psychiatric disorder and personality.Psychol. Med. 15: 243–254.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Statens Vegvesen og Miljøverndepartement (1979).Nordisk Beregningsmetode for Vegtrafikkstøy, Håndbok 064, Statens Vegvesen, Oslo.Google Scholar
  21. Tarnopolsky, A., Barker, S. M., Wiggins, R. D., and McLean, E. K. (1978). The effect of aircraft noise on the mental health of a community sample: A pilot study.Psychol. Med. 8: 219–233.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Tarnopolsky, A., Watkins, G., and Hand, D. J. (1980). Aircraft noise and mental health. I. Prevalence of individual symptoms.Psychol. Med. 10: 683–698.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ursin, H. (1987). Personality, activation, and psychosomatic disease. In Magnusson, D. and Øhman, D. (eds.),Psychopathology: An International Perspective, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Ursin, H., and Murison, R. (eds.) (1983).Biological and Psychological Basis of Psychosomatic Disease, Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
  25. Ursin, H., Endresen, I. M., and Ursin, G. (1988). Psychological factors and self-reports of muscle pain.Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 57: 282–290.Google Scholar
  26. von Eiff, A. W., Friedrich, G., and Neus, H. (1982). Traffic noise, a factor in the pathogenesis of essential hypertension.Contrib. Nephrol. 30: 82–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Watkins, G., Tarnopolsky, A., and Jenkins, L. (1981). Aircraft noise and mental health. II. Use of medicines and health care services.Psychol. Med. 11: 155–168.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Weinstein, N. D. (1980). Individual differences in critical tendencies and noise annoyance.J. Sound Vibrat. 68: 241–248.Google Scholar
  29. Weinstein, N. D. (1982). Community noise problems: Evidence against adaptation to noise.J. Environ. Psychol. 2: 87–97.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary Ellen Nivison
    • 1
  • Inger M. Endresen
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Physiological PsychologyDepartment of Biological and Medical PsychologyÅrstadveien 21Norway

Personalised recommendations