Advertisement

Journal of Behavioral Medicine

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 91–103 | Cite as

Coping styles, paradox, and the cold pressor task

  • Jay S. Efran
  • Robert L. Chorney
  • L. Michael Ascher
  • Michael D. Lukens
Article

Abstract

The study investigated how coping style differences affected performance on the cold pressor task. Reactions of “monitors” (individuals who prefer having information about stressors) and “blunters” (individuals who avoid cues connected with stressors) were compared, using different instructional sets. The study also assessed the effectiveness of paradoxical intention compared to more traditional cognitive strategies. Monitors and blunters were identified using Miller's recently developed Behavioral Style Scale. All instructional sets improved performance in comparison to a control condition, and individuals generally did better when an instructional set supported their preferred coping style. Paradoxical intention did not show any decided advantage over other strategies. The desirability of designing stress management programs to fit individual coping style patterns is discussed.

Key words

coping cold pressor stress paradox behavioral style 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahles, T. A., and Blanchard, E. B. (1983). Cognitive control of pain: Attention to the sensory aspects of the cold pressor stimulus.Cognit. Ther. Res. 7: 159–178.Google Scholar
  2. Ascher, L. M. (1980). Paradoxical intention. In Goldstein, A., and Foa, E. B. (eds.),Handbook of Behavioral Interventions, John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Ascher, L. M., and DiTomasso, R. A. (1985). Paradoxical intention in behavior therapy: A review of the experimental literature. In Turner, R. M., and Ascher, L. M. (eds.),Evaluating Behavior Therapy, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Ascher, L. M., and Efran, J. S. (1978). The use of paradoxical intention in a behavioral program for sleep onset insomnia.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 46: 547–550.Google Scholar
  5. Avia, M. D., and Kanfer, F. H. (1980). Coping with aversive stimulation: The effects of training in a self-management context.Cognit. Ther. Res. 4: 73–81.Google Scholar
  6. Beers, T. M., and Karoly, P. (1979). Cognitive strategies, expectancy, and coping style in the control of pain.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 47: 179–180.Google Scholar
  7. Byrne, D. (1961). The repression-sensitization scale: Rationale, reliability, and validity.J. Personal. 29: 334–349.Google Scholar
  8. Byrne, D. (1964). Repression-sensitization as a dimension of personality. In Maher, B. A. (ed.),Progress in Experimental Personality Research, Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Crowne, D. P., and Marlowe, D. A. (1964).The Approval Motive, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Epstein, S., and Fenz, W. D. (1967). The detection of areas of emotional stress through variations in perceptual threshold and physiological arousal.J. Exp. Res. Personal. 2: 191–199.Google Scholar
  11. Gard, D., Edwards, P. W., Harris, J., and McCormack, G. (1988). Sensitizing effects of pretreatment measures on cancer chemotherapy nausea and vomiting.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 56: 80–84.Google Scholar
  12. Gilligan, R. M., Ascher, L. M., Wolper, J., and Bochachevsky, C. (1984). Comparison of three cognitive stratgegies in altering pain behaviors on a cold pressor task.Percept. Motor Skills, 59: 235–240.Google Scholar
  13. Greenstein, S. M. (1984). Pleasant and unpleasant slides: Their effects on pain tolerance.Cognit. Ther. Res. 8: 201–210.Google Scholar
  14. Horwitz, E. A., Shipley, R. H., and McGuire, D. (1977). The use of external distractors to reduce pain and anxiety associated with stressful medical and dental procedures. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  15. Kirk, R. E. (1968).Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences, Brooks/Cole, Belmont, Calif.Google Scholar
  16. McCaul, K. D., and Haugtvedt, C. (1982). Attention, distraction, and cold-pressor pain.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 43: 154–162.Google Scholar
  17. McCaul, K. D., and Malott, J. M. (1984). Distraction and coping with pain.Psychol. Bull. 95: 516–533.Google Scholar
  18. Melzack, R. (1973).The Puzzle of Pain, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Miller, S. M. (1979). Coping with impending stress: A behavioral, subjective, and psychophysiological analysis.Psychophysiology 16: 572–581.Google Scholar
  20. Miller, S. M. (1980). When is a little information a dangerous thing? Coping with stressful life-events by monitoring vs. blunting. In Levine, S., and Ursin, H. (eds.),Coping and Health, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Miller, S. M. (1987). Monitoring and blunting: Validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information-seeking under threat.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 52: 345–353.Google Scholar
  22. Miller, S. M., and Mangan, C. E. (1983). Interacting effects of information and coping style in adapting to gynecologic stress: Should the doctor tell all?J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 45: 223–236.Google Scholar
  23. Miller, S. M., Brody, D. S., and Summerton, J. (1988). Styles of coping with threat: Implications for health.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 54: 142–148.Google Scholar
  24. Miller, S. M., Leinbach, A., and Brody, D. S. (1989). Coping style in hypertensives: Nature and consequences for treatment.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 57(3): 339–343.Google Scholar
  25. Pennebaker, J. W., and Lightner, J. M. (1980). Competition of internal and external information in an exercise setting.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 39: 165–174.Google Scholar
  26. Phipps, S., and Zinn, A. B. (1986). Psychological response to amniocentesis. II. Effects of coping style.Am. J. Med. Genet. 25: 143–148.Google Scholar
  27. Rosenbaum, M. (1980). Individual differences in self-control behaviors and tolerance of painful stimulation.J. Abnorm. Psychol. 89: 581–590.Google Scholar
  28. Spanos, N. P., Radtke-Bodorik, L., Ferguson, J. D., and Jones, B. (1979). The effects of hypnotic susceptibility, suggestions for analgesia, and the utilization of cognitive strategies on the reduction of pain.J. Abnorm. Psychol. 88: 282–292.Google Scholar
  29. Steptoe, A., and O'Sullivan, J. (1986). Monitoring and blunting coping styles in women prior to surgery.Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 25: 143–144.Google Scholar
  30. Stevenson, M. K., Kanfer, F. H., and Higgins, J. M. (1984). Effects of goal specificity and time cues on pain tolerance.Cognit. Ther. Res. 8: 415–426.Google Scholar
  31. Taylor, L. W., Odegaard, V., and Watkins, L. O. (1983). Benefits of sensory instruction in preparation for cardiac catheterization: A randomized, controlled trial.Circulation 68: III-191.Google Scholar
  32. Tellegen, A., and Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“absorption”): A trait related to hypnotic susceptibility.J. Abnorm. Psychol. 83: 268–277.Google Scholar
  33. Watkins, L. O., Weaver, L., and Odegaard, V. (1986). Preparation for cardiac catheterization: Tailoring the content of instruction to coping style.Heart Lung 15: 382–389.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jay S. Efran
    • 1
  • Robert L. Chorney
    • 1
  • L. Michael Ascher
    • 1
  • Michael D. Lukens
    • 1
  1. 1.Temple UniversityPhiladelphia

Personalised recommendations