Abstract
This paper examines the spatial patterns of population density, household automobile ownership and other socio-demographic variables that affect urban travel, as a function of distance from the central city core. Spatial density functions provide a useful characterization of urban structure, and of its evolution when taken at different time intervals. Analysis of the data from four case cities (Austin, Atlanta, Dallas, Phoenix) for 1960, 1970 and 1980 reveals continuing overall dispersion away from the traditional central core, accompanied by the densification of formerly low-density suburbs. This presents implications for high congestion levels in the densifying “suburban” communities, comparable to those typically associated with the CBD. In addition, the analysis has captured the continuing growth of average household automobile ownership and revealed a distinct spatial pattern that seems to be robust across the case areas considered, as well as within radial corridors in the one case that was so analyzed (Austin).
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- Y:
-
gross population density in census tractt
- X t :
-
distance in miles from the center of tract to the CBD
- α:
-
parameter representing the central business district density
- γy:
-
“density gradient” parameter
- X0, X1, X2, and X3:
-
locations of the knots in a three segment division of the x-axis
- Di :
-
dummy variable defined for thei-th segment
- μ1 :
-
normally distributed disturbance term,a i,b i,c i,d i,i = 1, 2, 3 — parameters to be estimated
- A t :
-
area of census tractt
References
Anderson JE (1985) The changing structure of a city: temporal changes in cubic spline urban density patterns. Journal of Regional Science 25: 413–427
Anderson JE (1982) Cubic spline urban density functions. Journal of Urban Economics 12: 155–167
Brotchie J, Newton P, Hall P & Nijkamp P (1985) The Future of Urban Form: The Impact of New Technology. Nichols Publishing Co.
Cervero R (1986) Intrametropolitan trends in Sunbelt and western cities: transportation implications (presented at the 65th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Borad, Washington, D.C.)
Clark C (1951) Urban population densities. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 114: 490–496
Conte C (1985) The explosive growth of suburbia leads to bumper-to-bumper blues. The Wall Street Journal April 16: 37
Frankena MW (1978) A bias in estimating urban population density functions. Journal of Urban Economics 5: 35–45
Lakshmanan TR & Chatterjee L (1986) Technical change and metropolitan adjustments: some policy and analytical implications. Regional Science and Urban Economics: 15: 7–30
Mahmassani HS, Herman R, Walton CM, Baaj MH, Govind S, Tong C-C & Williams JC (1986) Characterizing the evolution of urban patterns and traffic network performance: Research report GM-1986-F, Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin
McDonald J & Bowman HW (1976) Some tests of alternative urban population density functions. Journal of Urban Economics 3: 242–252
Muth R (1969) Cities and Housing. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
Orski CK (1985) Suburban mobility: the coming transportation crisis?, Transportation Quarterly 39: 283–296
Poirier DJ (1973) Piecewise regression using cubic splines. Journal of the American Statistical Association 68: 515–524
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mahmassani, H.S., Baaj, M.H. & Tong, C.C. Characterization and evolution of spatial density patterns in urban areas. Transportation 15, 233–256 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00837583
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00837583