Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial variations in attitudes toward expanded public transit service

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although recent budgetary considerations by the Federal govenment do not portend well for urban public transit, some transit systems are considering expansion into less densely-settled areas further from the Central Business District. Of some concern to planners has been their belief that suburban and rural dwellers may be much less inclined than urban dwellers to support expansion of transit service. This paper presents an analysis of a random-digit dialing/mail-out, mail-back survey conducted in Washtenaw County, Michigan which was designed specifically to examine differences in attitudes between urban and rural residents. Six mutually-exclusive spatial strata were established based upon population density. This paper tests for expected spatial differences in socioeconomic and demographic variables and then examines spatial variations in attitudes toward public transportation. The major conclusion is that the expected spatial variations in attitudes about transit service provision between the spatial strata do not arise. Most of the significant differences found are with respect to questions which relate to where transit is provided. Residents in rural (urban) areas support more strongly the provision of services to rural (urban) areas. Many residents, however, will support transit service that may not benefit them directly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ampt E, Brög W, McLean A & Winkler K (1985) What is the public awareness of public transport? Paper presented at the 10th Australian Transport Research Forum, Victoria

  • Bern D (1972) Self-perception theory. In: Berkowitz L (Ed) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Berla M (1974) Initial response to a demand-responsive public transportation system. Ann Arbor, MI: unpublished Ph.D., The University of Michigan

  • Community Planning and Management Program (CPM) (1975) 1974 CPM Survey on Citizen Attitudes. Ann Arbor, MI: City of Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan D (1956) The Ann Arbor Bus System Survey. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan, School of Business Administration

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding GB, Blankenship D & Tardiff T (1976) Consumer attitudes toward public transit. Transportation Research Record 563: 22–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Forkenbrock D (1977) The Nature of Support for Public Transit — The Ann Arbor Case (pp 2, 144–5, 149) Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Urban and Regional Planning

    Google Scholar 

  • Forkenbrock D (1978) Factors that influence local support for public transit expenditures. Transportation Research Record 761:14–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman H & Sheskin I (1982) Urban-rural differences in attitudes toward transportation related energy conservation measures. East Lakes Geographer 17–24

  • Green et al. (1974) Fiscal Interactions in a Metropolitan Area. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmatuck D (1976) Referendum voting as a guide to public support for mass transit. Traffic Quarterly 30: 347–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetrick V (1974) Factors influencing voting behavior in support of rapid transit in Seattle and Atlanta. Seattle: unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Ippolito D & Levin M (1970) Public regardingness, race and social class: the case of a rapid transit referendum. Social Science Quarterly 51: 628–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Neenan W (1972) Political Economy of Urban Areas. Markham Publishing Company, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Neidell L (1974) Research note: Analysis and demand implications of the rapid transit vote in Atlanta. Transportation Journal 13: 14–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock A & Wiseman J (1961) The Growth of Public Expenditures in the United Kingdom. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheskin I (1985) Survey Research for Geographers, Resource Publications in Geography. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Geographers

    Google Scholar 

  • Soot S, Kartheiser J & Wojtkiewicz S (1976) The Chicago area regional transportation authority referendum: Analysis of the voter support demand implications. Traffic Quarterly 30: 329–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Stipak B (1973) An analysis of the 1968 rapid transit vote in Los Angeles. Transportation 2: 71–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Stopher P & Sheskin I (1982) Method for determining and reducing nonresponse bias. Transportation Research Record 886: 35–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan (1978) Public Transportation in Ann Arbor: A Report of the Findings from the 1977 Survey (p 136). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sheskin, I.M., Stopher, P.R. Spatial variations in attitudes toward expanded public transit service. Transportation 15, 211–232 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00837582

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00837582

Key words

Navigation