European Journal of Nuclear Medicine

, Volume 23, Issue 5, pp 491–493 | Cite as

Internal dosimetry: developments and limitations

  • Peter J. Mountford
Editorial

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Stabin M, Stubbs J, Watson E. Recent controversy in radiation dosimetry.Eur J Nucl Med 1993; 20: 371–372.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Poston J. Application of the effective dose equivalent to nuclear medicine patients.J Nucl Med 1993; 34: 714–716.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Loevinger R, Budinger TF, Watson EE, eds.MIRD primer for absorbed dose calculations. New York: Society of Nuclear Medicine, 1989.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    International Commission on Radiological Protection. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals (including Addendum 1), 2nd edn.Annals of the ICRP 18 (1–4). ICRP publication 53. Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1994.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roedler HD. Accuracy of internal dose calculations with special consideration of radiopharmaceutical kinetics. In: Watson EE, Schlafke-Stelson A, Coffey JL, Cloutier RJ, eds.Third International Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry Symposium, Proceedings of a Conference held at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 1980. HHS Publication FDA 81-8166. Department of Health and Human Services, Bureau of Radiological Health, Rockville, Maryland; 1981: 1–20.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Forge NI, Mountford PJ, O'Doherty MJ. Quantification of technetium-99m lung radioactivity from planar images.Eur J Nucl Med 1993; 20: 10–15.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mattson S. Summary and highlights. In: Schlafke-Stelson A, Watson EE, eds.Fifth International Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry Symposium. Proceedings of a Conference held at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 1991. CONF-910529. Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, Tennessee; 1991: 600–605.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Snyder WS, Ford MR, Warner GG.Estimates of specific absorbed fractions for photon sources uniformly distributed in organs of a heterogeneous phantom. MIRD Pamphlet No 5. New York: Society of Nuclear Medicine, 1978.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements.Protection in nuclear medicine and ultrasound diagnostic procedures in children. Report No 73. Bethesda, Maryland: NCRP, 1983.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cristy M, Eckerman K.Specific absorbed fractions of energy at various ages from internal photon sources. Report ORNL/TM-8381/V1-7. Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Office of Science and Technical Information, 1987.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vestergren E, Jacosson L, Mattson S, Johansson L, Bjure J, Sixt R, Uvebrandt P. Biokinetics and dosimetry of 99-Tc-HMPAO in children. In: Schlafke-Stelson A, Watson EE, eds.Fifth International Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry Symposium. Proceedings of a Conference held at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 1991. CONF-910529. Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, Tennessee; 1991: 444–456.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stabin M, Watson EE, Cristy M, Ryman JC, Eckerman KF, Davis JL, Marshall D, Gehlen MK.Mathematical models and specific absorbed fractions of photon energy in the non-pregnant adult female and at the end of each trimester of pregnancy. Report ORNL/TM-12907. Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Office of Science and Technical Information, 1995.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Administration of Radioactive Substances Advisory Committee.Notes for guidance on the administration of radioactive substances to persons for purposes of diagnosis, treatment or research. London: Department of Health, 1993.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Makrigiorgos GM, Adelstein SJ, Kassis AI. Cellular radiation dosimetry and its implications for estimation of radiation risks. Illustrative results with technetium-99m-labeled microspheres and macroaggregates.JAMA 1990; 264: 592–595.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kassis AI, Adelstein SJ. Does nonuniformity of dose have implications for radiation protection?J Nucl Med 1992; 33: 384–387.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Faraggi M, Gardin I, de Labriolle-Vaylet C, Moretti J-L, Bok BD. The influence of tracer localisation on the electron dose rate delivered to the cell nucleus.J Nucl Med 1994; 35: 113–119.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chan PC, Liso E, Adelstein SJ. The radiotoxicity of iodine-125 in mammalian cells. II. A comparative study on cell survival and cytogenic responses to125IUdR,131IUdR and3HTdR.Radiat Res 1976; 67: 332–343.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Howell RW, Narra VR, Sastry KSR, Rao DV. On the equivalent dose for Auger electron emitters.Radiat Res 1993; 134: 71–78.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Howell RW. The MIRD Schema: from organ to cellular dimensions.J Nucl Med 1994; 35: 531–533.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rao DV, Sastry KSR, Grimmond HE, Howell RW, Govelitz GF, Lanka VK, Mylavarapu VB. Cytotoxicity of some indium radiopharmaceuticals in mouse testes.J Nucl Med 1988; 29: 375–384.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Comerford SL, Bond VP, Cronkite EP, Reincke U. Radiotoxicity of intranuclear I-125 atoms not bound to DNA.Int J Radiat Biol 1980; 37: 547–554.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Johansson L. S-values for bone surfaces with a source distributed homogeneously in bone volume or with a surface deposited source. In: Watson EE, Schlafke-Stelson A, Coffey JL, Cloutier RJ, eds.Third International Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry Symposium. Proceedings of a Conference held at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 1980. HHS Publication FDA 81-8166. Department of Health and Human Services, Bureau of Radiological Health, Rockville, Maryland; 1981: 554–562.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Coffey JL, Watson EE. S-values for selected radionuclides and organs with the heart wall and heart contents as source organs. In: Watson EE, Schlafke-Stelson A, Coffey JL, Cloutier RJ, eds.Third International Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry Symposium. Proceedings of a Conference held at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 1980. HHS Publication FDA 81-8166. Department of Health and Human Services, Bureau of Radiological Health, Rockville, Maryland; 1981: 563–594.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goddu SM, Howell RW, Rao DV. Cellular dosimetry: absorbed fractions for monoenergetic electron and alpha particle sources and S-values for radionuclides uniformly distributed in different cell compartments.J Nucl Med 1994; 35: 303–316.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Puncher MRB, Blower PJ. Radionuclide targeting and dosimetry at the microscopic level: the role of autoradiography.Eur Nucl Med 1994; 21: 1347–1365.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter J. Mountford
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biomedical Engineering and Medical PhysicsNorth Staffordshire HospitalHartshillUK

Personalised recommendations