Skip to main content
Log in

Differences in the neurochemical mechanisms of conditioning to stimuli of different modalities at the caudate nucleus level in rats

  • Physiology
  • Published:
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine Aims and scope

Abstract

Microinjection of noradrenalin into the head of the caudate nucleus in rats did not affect the latent period of avoidance conditioning or muscle tone but inhibited motor activity, reduced the number of taps, and significantly increased the amplitude and latent period of the conditioned food-getting reflex. Local microinjection of serotonin into the neostriatum did not affect the latent period of the conditioned avoidance reflex and did not change the motor activity but it reduced the latent period and the number of taps in the conditioned food-getting response and increased its amplitude significantly. Dopamine inhibited the conditioned food and avoidance reflexes but significantly activated the spontaneous motor activity of the rats. The results are evidence of differences in the neurochemical mechanisms of conditioned reflexes to stimuli of different modalities closed at the caudate nucleus level in rats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. P. K. Anokhin, The Biology and Neurophysiology of the Conditioned Reflex [in Russian], Moscow (1968).

  2. A. S. Denisova, Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., No. 2, 260 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yu. M. Dryagin and A. V. Mikhailov, Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., No. 1, 64 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. I. Kotlyarovskii, Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., No. 3, 753 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. V. Makarenko and V. A. Troshikhin, Fiziol. Zh. (Ukr.), No. 6, 832 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. N. Oleshko, Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., No. 1, 144 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. F. Suvorov, in: The Striopallidary System [in Russian], Leningrad (1971), p. 3.

  8. A. N. Talalaenko, Byull. Éksperim. Biol. i Med., No. 4, 3 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. V. Sudakov, Biological Motivations [in Russian], Moscow (1971).

  10. J. Bureš, M. Petran, and I. Zachar, Electrophysiological Methods of Investigation [Russian translation], Moscow (1962).

  11. M. J. Besson, A. Cheramy, P. Feltz, et al., J. Physiol. (Paris),61, 90 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. D. Connor, J. Physiol. (London),208, 691 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. Fuxe, T. Hökfelt, and U. Understedt, Internat. Rev. Neurobiol.,13, 93 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Glowinsky and L. L. Iversen, J. Neurochem.,13, 655 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Takatsuka, T. Segawa, and H. Takagi, J. Neurochem.,17, 695 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. A. Wada, J. Wrinch, D. Hill, et al., Arch. Neurol. (Chicago),9, 68 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Talalaenko, A.N. Differences in the neurochemical mechanisms of conditioning to stimuli of different modalities at the caudate nucleus level in rats. Bull Exp Biol Med 79, 349–352 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00832693

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00832693

Key Words

Navigation