Studies in Soviet Thought

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 147–160 | Cite as

Labriola, Croce, anti-Croce

  • James G. ColbertJr.
Article
  • 23 Downloads

Conclusions

From all this some unexpected results become apparent:
  1. (1)

    Labriola is not the father of Italian Eurocommunism, but rather a thorough-going internationalist.

     
  2. (2)

    Labriola might reasonably be called a Marxist humanist. In the light of his acknowledged dependence on Engels, this would seem directly to challenge the post-Lukács tendency variously to blame Engels for dialectical materialism, the Soviet scholastic spirit, or even Stalin.

     
  3. (3)

    Croce's critique of Labriola is telling and Gramsci's direct response is ineffective in so far as he simply tries to revindicate Labriola the classical Marxist.

     
  4. (4)

    It is at least curious that Gramsci attacks primarily Croce, the liberal idealist, rather than Gentile, the fascist idealist. Much of the criticism is that Croce does not go far enough, is not immanentist and historicist enough.

     
  5. (5)

    This, in turn, suggests that one should look for Gramsci's original contribution and his overriding concern in political philosophy and not at all in metaphysics.

     

Keywords

Unexpected Result Political Philosophy Direct Response Original Contribution Liberal Idealist 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Co 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • James G. ColbertJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Boston State CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations