Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 45, Issue 6, pp 268–273 | Cite as

Experimental evidence on limitations of the heritability parameter

  • H. H. Meyer
  • F. D. Enfield
Article

Summary

Two-way selection was practiced at three selection intensities for 21 day pupa weight inTribolium castaneum. Each of the 19 single-generation replicates of the project consisted of three populations, one each being selected upward and downward at 10, 30 and 50% selection intensities. Realized heritability for divergence was significantly lower for the least intense (50%) level than for the 10% and 30% selection intensities. Both expected heritabilities, calculated from the regression of offspring on parents, and realized heritabilities were much larger for downward than for upward selection. Expected and realized estimates of heritability were consistent within direction of selection, but estimates of heritability for divergence were of little value in predicting directional weight change. The variation observed for heritability estimates was similar to that expected from published prediction equations. The asymmetry of heritability estimates and the differential effects of selection intensity on the magnitude of realized heritability are not consistent with the usual assumption of a linear relationship between genotype and phenotype.

Keywords

Linear Relationship Experimental Evidence Differential Effect Weight Change Heritability Estimate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Clayton, G. A., Morris, J. A., Robertson, A.: An experimental check on quantitative genetic theory. I. Shortterm responses to selection. J. Genet.55, 131–151 (1957).Google Scholar
  2. Enfield, F. D.: Long term selection for pupa weight inTribolium: gene action and gene number. Genetics74 (Suppl.), S72-S73 (1973).Google Scholar
  3. Enfield, F. D., Comstock, R. E., Braskerud, O.: Selection for pupa weight inTribolium castaneum I. Parameters in base populations. Genetics54, 523–533 (1966).Google Scholar
  4. Falconer, D. S.: Selection for large and small size in mice. J. Genet.51, 470–501 (1953).Google Scholar
  5. Falconer, D. S.: Patterns of response in selection experiments with mice. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol.20, 178–196 (1955).Google Scholar
  6. Falconer, D. S.: The genetics of litter size in mice. J. Cell. and Comp. Physiol.56 (Suppl. 1), 153–167 (1960).Google Scholar
  7. Frankham, R., Jones, L. P., Barker, J. S. F.: The effects of population size and selection intensity in selection for a quantitative character inDrosophila. I. Shortterm response to selection. Genet. Res.12, 237–248 (1968).Google Scholar
  8. Gall, G. A. E.: Replicated selection for 21-day pupa weight ofTribolium castaneum. Theoret. Appl. Genetics41, 164–173 (1971).Google Scholar
  9. Goodwill, R.: Comparisons of three selection programs usingTribolium castaneum. J. Heredity65, 8–14 (1974).Google Scholar
  10. Hill, W. G.: Design of experiments to estimate heritability by regression of offspring on selected parents. Biometrics26, 566–571 (1970).Google Scholar
  11. Hill, W. G.: Design and efficiency of selection experiments for estimating genetic parameters. Biometrics27, 293–311 (1971).Google Scholar
  12. Hill, W. G.: Estimation of realized heritabilities from selection experiments. I. Divergent selection. Biometrics28, 747–765 (1972).Google Scholar
  13. Wilson, S. P.: Experimental comparisons of individual versus family selection systems. II. Single generation tests. 22nd National Breeders Roundtable, 45–60 (1973).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. H. Meyer
    • 1
  • F. D. Enfield
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations