Conclusions
The steady-state static and dynamic errors of analog and digital systems under normal and working conditions have to be considered as particular cases of the corresponding transient-state errors, not components of the latter. This general approach to error determination provides statistical characteristics that fully incorporate the features of the data processing, in particular much better than do existing methods, which are to be considered as approximate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
G. A. Shtamberger et al., Prib. Sist. Upr., No. 11 (1975).
A. I. Zaiko, Prib. Sist. Upr., No. 11 (1975).
All-Union State Standard (GOST) 16263-70. “The State System of Measurements. Metrology: terms and definitions.”
K. P. Shirokov et al., Izmer. Tekh., No. 12 (1975).
B. R. Levin, Theoretical Principles of Statistical Radio Engineering, Vol. 1 [in Russian], Sovetskoe Radio (1974).
A. I. Zaiko, Prib. Sist. Upr., No. 1 (1977).
GOST 8.009-72: “The State System of Measurements. Standardizable metrological characteristics of means of measurement.”
M. A. Zemel'man, Automatic Correction of Errors in Measuring Devices [in Russian], Standartov, Moscow (1972).
Additional information
Translated from Izmeritel'naya Tekhnika, No. 9, pp. 21–24, September, 1979.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zaiko, A.I. Error definition for data-acquisition systems in steady and unsteady states. Meas Tech 22, 1053–1057 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00830584
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00830584