Conclusions
-
1.
The dependence of the measuring error on the signal being measured has been characterized for three methods of converting the current being measured into a time interval.
For methods 1 and 2 (Figs. 1 and 2) this dependence is complicated and its effect cannot be eliminated by reasonably simple means. For method 3 (see Fig. 3) this dependence is proportional so that the measuring error can be compensated.
-
2.
For higher requirements on the measuring accuracy it is advisable to use methods 2 and 3 because they permit operation with comparison thresholds approximately equal to zero, which improves the measuring accuracy.
-
3.
If high accuracy is required simultaneously with linearity of the conversion function, it is advisable to use method 3.
From the results of experiments on these methods of forming a time interval a relation was obtained between the relative error σ of a digital conversion and the input current. The converter using method 3 had the best accuracy, especially in the low-current region, which agrees well with the theoretical conclusions obtained above.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
A. K. Osipov, Prib. Tekh. Éksp., No. 1 (1971).
A. A. Archakov, Izmeritel. Tekh., No. 4 (1973).
A. Kh. Sinel'nikov, Electronic Timing Relays [in Russian], Énergiya, Moscow (1974).
Additional information
Translated from Izmeritel'naya Tekhnika, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 78–80, June, 1976.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kurochkin, E.P., Trofimov, V.A. Analysis of integrating electrometers with a time-pulse signal. Meas Tech 19, 903–906 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00822898
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00822898