Skip to main content
Log in

Another role for citizens: Three variations of citizen evaluation review

  • Articles
  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Dale, D.Beyond expert: A guide for citizen group training. University of Massachusetts, Citizen Involvement Training Project, 1979.

  • Davis, H. R., Windle, C., & Sharfstein, S. S. Developing guidelines for program evaluation capability in community mental health centers.Evaluation, 1977,4, 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H. & Gustafson, D. H.Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and delphi processes. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, J. K., Norris, E. L. & Kroll, J.Consultation and its outcome: Community mental health centers. Palo Alto, CA.: American Institute for Research, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olander, F. & Lindhoff, H. Consumer action research: A review of the consumerism literature and suggestions for new directions in research.Social Science Information, 1975,14, 147–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salasin, S. E., & Davis, H. R. Facilitating the utilization of evaluation: A rocky road. In I. Davidoff, M. Guttentag & J. Offutt (Eds.),Evaluating community mental health services: Principles and practices. DHEW publication number ADM 77-46, 1977.

  • Windle, C. The citizen as part of the management process. In H. C. Schulberg & J. M. Jerrell (Eds.),The Evaluator and Management. Beverly Hills, CA.: Sage Publications, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windle, C. & Neigher, W. Ethical problems in program evaluation: Advice for trapped evaluators.Evaluation and Program Planning, 1978,1 (2), 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

The approaches described herein are based on the work of the Florida Consortium Grant Project on Citizen Involvement in CMHC Planning and Evaluation supported by NIMH grant number MH-28784, Charles Windle, Project Officer. The project has had the continuing guidance of Sherman Ragland and Harlan Zinn of the Citizen Participation Program, NIMH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zinober, J.W., Dinkel, N.R., Landsberg, G. et al. Another role for citizens: Three variations of citizen evaluation review. Community Ment Health J 16, 317–330 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00821563

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00821563

Keywords

Navigation