Advertisement

Soviet Physics Journal

, Volume 10, Issue 10, pp 92–96 | Cite as

Diffusion phenomena on rubbing surfaces in relation to wear resistance

  • M. P. Kudrina
  • Yu. I. Kogan
  • K. V. Savitskii
Article
  • 11 Downloads

Conclusions

When steel parts are working under heavy-duty conditions, there is always a possibility of the formation of carbides on their rubbing surfaces as a result of decomposition of lubricants and subsequent reaction of carbon with the metal. This process is inevitably associated with local seizing and mutual material transfer. As a result, the carbide phase formed during friction betwen two steels of a different composition may differ from the adjacent material in respect to its content of carbide-forming elements. When strong carbide-forming elements are present in a steel with a friction-induced surface carbide layer, heating such a steel to relatively low temperatures leads to localized decarburization which, under certain circumstances, may reduce the wear resistance of steel. In a simple case of a binary alloy, the rate of decarburization depends on the affinity of the alloying element to carbon.

When this affinity in high, the decarburization rate may be slow because of a reduced intensity of the diffusion flux (due to reduced solubility and diffusion coefficients, and because of carbide formation in the contact zone), while elements with a lower affinity to carbon produce a more intense decarburization.

The above considerations do not apply to high-alloy steels in which the extent of carbide-forming elements is so high that practically all the carbon diffusing to the contact interface combines with these elements to form carbides. In this case the reduction in the coefficient of diffusion of carbon in steel does not play any substantial part because its diffusion path is relatively short. It is to be expected that in this case the decarburization rate will increase with increasing tendency of the alloying elements to carbide formation.

It should be pointed out that the dissolution of surface carbide layers takes place also in cases when the carbide layers are produced as a result of friction between similar alloy steels because a large proportion of the carbide-forming elements is dissolved in ferrite (i.e., is not combined in carbides), while the carbide layers contain large quantities of cementite. This means that the decarburization rate is determined in the first place by the chemical composition of the steel and not of the carbide layer.

Facts reported in this article will assist, when necessary, in a rational selection of the friction pair components with a view to reducing or eliminating the decarburization of the surface layers. Needless to say, experimental studies (using the above described methods) will have to be carried out in each specific case. It is also evident that data of this kind are not sufficient to make recommendations about selecting materials for any given friction pair, since all the other factors determining the wear resistance must be taken into account.

Keywords

Carbide Ferrite Wear Resistance Cementite Alloy Steel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    K. V. Savitskii and M. P. Zagrebennikova, DAN SSSR,103, no. 4, 605, 1955.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. V. Savitskii and M. P. Zagrebennikova, DAN SSSR,119, no. 3, 490, 1958.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. V. Savitskii and M. A. Ilyushchenkov, Uchenye zapiski Tomskogo gosuniversiteta, vol. 32, 182, 1958.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. V. Savitskii and Yu. I. Kogan, FMM,15, no. 5, 1963.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. P. Kudrina, Yu. I. Kogan, and K. V. Savitskii, FKhMM (in press).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. V. Savitskii, Yu. I. Kogan, and M. P. Kudrina, Izv. VUZ. Fizika, no. 6, 1960.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. V. Savitskii, Yu. I. Kogan, and M. P. Kudrina, Izv. VUZ. Fizika, no. 6, 1963.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. D. Kuznetsov, K. V. Savitskii, Yu. I. Kogan, and M. P. Kudrina, Izv. VUZ. Chernaya metallurgiya, no. 8, 1964.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. V. Savitskii, Yu. I. Kogan, and M. P. Kudrina, “Investigations in the field of hardness measurement,” Trudy in-tov Komiteta standartov, mer i izmeritel'nykh priborov SSSR, vol. 91 (151), Izd. standartov, Leningrad-Moscow, 1967.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. I. Arkharov, S. I. Ivanovskaya, and S. A. Nemonov, Trudy in-ta fiziki metallov UF AN SSSR, no. 11, 1950.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. P. Kudrina, Yu. I. Kogan, and K. V. Savitskii, Metallovendenie i termicheskaya obrabotka metallov, no. 3, 1967.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. Zeit, Diffusion in Metals [Russian translation], IIL, Moscow, 1958.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. A. Krishtal, ZhTF,23, 7, 1175, 1953.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Consultants Bureau 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. P. Kudrina
    • 1
  • Yu. I. Kogan
    • 1
  • K. V. Savitskii
    • 1
  1. 1.Kuznetsov Siberian Physicotechnical InstituteUSSR

Personalised recommendations