Skip to main content
Log in

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. See acknowledgements.

  2. The other paper was reprinted and revised in Vol 1, (1) of this journal pp. 21–32. Owen, S. and Heywood, J. Transition Technology in Ireland: An Experimental Course.

  3. Parlett, M. and King, J.G. (1971)Concentrated Study: A Pedagogic Innovation. Society for Research into Higher Education, Guildford.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Flanagan, J.C. (1947) A New Approach to Evaluating Personnel.Personnel 26,35–42, and Sanders, M.S. and McCormick E.J. (1987)Human Factors in Engineering and Design p.624. McGraw Hill, New York. It has also been used to analyse headteacher behaviour e.g. Diggins, P. M.Ed thesis. University of Dublin.

  5. Quoted from Patterson, C.H. (1977)Foundation for a Theory of Instruction and Educational Psychology. Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carter, G., Heywood, J. and Kelly, D.T. (1986)A Case Study in Curriculum Assessment: GCE Engineering Science (Advanced). Roundthorn, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See the model in Whitfield, P.R. (1975)Creativity in Industry. Harmondsworth, Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Quoted by Beach, L.R. (1990)Image Theory: Decision Making in Personal and Organisational Contexts. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  9. MacFarlane Smith, I. (1964)Spatial Ability. University of London Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Galyean, B.C. (1983)Educational Leadership 40, (6), 54–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heywood, J. Dater and data. Int J Technol Des Educ 1, 130–133 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00819644

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00819644

Navigation