Abstract
In an age of increasing demands for professionalism and consumer accountability, social service agencies must rely heavily on competent evaluation of direct interventive services to provide empirical and verifiable data on client outcomes and program impact. Since the individual front line staff member is primarily responsible for evaluation of interventions, the supervisory role emerges as a critical factor to insure the competence and accuracy of this self-assessment. This discussion, therefore, provides basic guidelines for supervisors to assess the evaluative competence of staff and offers specific suggestions about what questions to ask and how to explore staff's motivations and methods of self-assessment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banner, D., Doctors, S. & Gordon, A.The Politics of Social Program Evaluation. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1975.
Bergen, A. & Strupp, H.Changing Frontiers in the Science of Psychotherapy. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton, 1972.
Berleman, W. Practitioners and research: First questions.Social Casework, 50(8): 461–66, 1969.
Birren, J. & Woodruff, D. Human development over the life span through education. In Baltes, P., & Schaie, W. eds.,Life Span Developmental Psychology: Personality and Socialization. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Briar, S.Major Trends and Issues in the Future Doctoral Training in Social Work. Paper presented at Conference on Issues in Social Work Doctoral Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, October 26–27, 1976.
Bridgman, P.Dimensional Analysis. New York: Harper and Row, 1931.
Casselman, B. On the practitioner's orientation toward research.Smith College Studies in Social Work 42(3): 211–33, 1972.
Dubin, R.Theory Building. New York: The Free Press, 1969.
Eaton, J. Symbolic and substantive evaluative research.Administrative Science Quarterly 6(3):421–42, 1962.
Edinburg, M., Zinberg, N., & Kelman, W.Clinical Interviewing and Counseling: Principles and Techniques. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1975.
Eldridge, W.Practitioner Approaches to Self-Evaluation Doctoral dissertation, University of Denver, 1979.
Fant, R., & Ross, A. Supervision of child care staff.Child Welfare 58(10):627–41, 1979.
Havighurst, R., & Orr, B.Adult Education and Adult Needs. Chicago: Center for Study of Liberal Education for Adults, 1956.
Hersen, M. & Barlow D.Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change. New York: Pergamon Press, 1976.
Houle, C.The Inquiring Mind: A Study of the Adult Who Continues to Learn. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1961.
Jayaratne, S., & Levy, R.Empirical Clinical Practice. New York: Columbia University Press, 1979.
Kahn, A.Theory and Practice of Social Planning. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1969.
Krill, D. Existential social work. In Turner, F., ed.Social Work Treatment: Interlocking Theoretical Approaches. New York: The Free Press, 1979.
LaCrosse, M. Computative perceptions of counselor behavior: A replication and extension.Journal of Counseling Psychology 24(6):464–71, 1977.
Landon, P.A Correlational Study of Diffusion Theory in Social Work Practice. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Denver, 1975.
Levy, C. Inputs versus outputs as criteria of competence.Social Casework 55(6): 375–81, 1974.
Lewis, H.Practice Science and Professional Education: Developing a Curriculum Responsive to New Knowledge and Values. Paper read at Symposium on Effectiveness of Social Work Intervention, Fordham University, New York, January 14–15, 1971.
Loewenberg, F.Fundamentals of Social Intervention. New York: Columbia University Press, 1977.
Lukton, R. Barriers and pathways to integrating research and practice in social work: suggestions for innovation in the MSW curriculum.Journal of Education for Social Work 16(2):20–25, 1980.
Meyer, C.Staff Development in Public Welfare Agencies. New York: Columbia University Press, 1966.
Morris, V.Existentialism in Education. New York: Harper and Row, 1966.
Neuber, K.Needs Assessment: A Model for Community Planning. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1980
Reid, W. & Epstein, L.Task-Centered Casework. New York: Columbia University Press, 1972.
Rodman, H., & Kolodny, R. The Research-Practitioner Relationship. In Caro, F., ed.Readings in Evaluative Research. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1971.
Ronnestad, H. Counselor personality and supervisory styles.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 217(1):56–60, 1976.
Rosenblatt, A. The practitioner's use and evaluation of research.Social Work 13(4):53–59, 1968.
Schaefer, C., & Mills, M. Self-rating of a child care worker: A comparison with children's ratings.Child Care Quarterly 4(4): 277–83, 1975.
Strean, H.Clinical Social Work: Theory and Practice. New York: The Free Press, 1978.
Suchman, E.Evaluative Research: Principles and Practice in Public Service and Social Action Programs. New York: Russell Sage, 1967.
Washington, R.Program Evaluation in the Human Services. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1980.
Weiss, C.Evaluation Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall, 1972.
Zastrow, C.The Practice of Social Work. Homewood, IL.: Dorsey Press, 1981.
Zimbalist, S. The research component of the master's degree curriculum in social work: A survey summary.Journal of Education for Social Work 10(1): 118–23, 1974.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eldridge, W.D. Coping with accountability and evaluation: Some guidelines for supervisors of direct service staff. Administration in Mental Health 11, 195–204 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00819531
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00819531