Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Scintigraphic imaging of oncogenes with antisense probes: does it make sense?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the specificity of the Watson-Crick base pairing formation, antisense deoxyoligonucleotides have been used to inhibit the expression of oncogenes in various cancer cells. Activation of an oncogene by means of amplification leads to an increased, detectable amount of the mRNA transcript in the cytoplasm. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that cells which are expressing a particular mRNA transcript do preferentially and specifically retain the antisense probe targeting that mRNA. Using a mouse plasmacytoma cell line (MOPC315) which produces high levels of IgA heavy chain mRNA, a control mouse pre B cell line (70ZJ3B), a human mammary cell line (MCF7) which expresses the erbB2 or neu oncogene, MOPC315 cells as neu-negative controls, and antisense DNA oligonucleotides complementary to the 5′ region of the mRNAs and the sense sequence, we have shown that there is a preferential, specific retention of the IgA andneu antisense sequence in MOPC315 and MCF7 cells, respectively. We have further demonstrated that this retention is time and concentration dependent with a maximum at 24 h. We conclude that cancer cells which express a particular oncogene are suitable targets for radiolabeled antisense deoxyoligonucleotides directed toward the oncogene transcript. This work and recent developments in the antisense field lead to the expectation of a new class of radiopharmaceuticals with unique specificity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weinberg RA. Molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis.Sci Am 1993; 12: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Weinberg RA. Oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes.CA Cancer J Clin 1994; 44: 160–170.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hélène C Toulmé JJ. Specific regulation of gene expression by sense and antisense nucleic acids.Biochem Biophys Acta 1990;1049:99–125.

    Google Scholar 

  4. van der Krol, AR, Mur L, Delange P, Mol JNM, Stuitje AR. Inhibition of flower pigmentation by antisense CHS genes: promoter and minimal sequence requirements for the antisense effect.Plant Mol Biol 1990; 14: 457–466.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Matsukura M, Shinozuka K, Zong G, Mitsuya H, Reitz M, Cohen JS, Broder S. Phosphorothioate analogs of oligonucleotides: inhibitors of replication and cytopathic effects of human immunodeficiency virus.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987; 83: 7706–7710.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ratajczak MZ, Kant JA, Luger SM, Hijya N, Zhang J, Zon G, Gewirtz AM. In vivo treatment of human leukemia in a SCID mouse model with c-myb antisense oligonucleotides.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89: 11823–11827.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hijya N, Zhang J, Ratajczak MZ, DeRiel K, Herlyn M, Gewirtz AM. The biological and therapeutic significance of cnzyb expression in human melanoma.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:4499–4503.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dewanjee MK, Ghafouripour AK, Kapadvanjwala, Dewanjee S, Serafmi AN, Lopez DM, Sfakianakis GN. Noninvasive imaging of c-myc oncogene messenger RNA with indium- 11-antisense probes in a mammary tumor-bearing mouse model.J Nucl Med 1994; 35: 1054–1063.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stein CA, Cheng YC. Antisense oligonucleotides as therapeutic agents. Is the bullet really magical?Science 1993; 261: 1004–1012.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Piwnica-Worms D. Making sense out of anti-sense: challenges of imaging gene translation with radiolabeled oligonucleotides.J Nucl Med 1994; 35:1064–1066.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sakano H, Maki R, Kurosawa Y, Roeder W Tonegawa S. Two types of somatic recombination are necessary for the generation of complete immunoglobulin heavy-chain genes.Nature 1980;286:676–683.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kraus MH, Popescu NC, Amsbaugh SC, King CR. Overexpression of the EGF receptor-related proto-oncogene erbB-2 in human mammary tumor cell lines by different molecular mechanisms.EMBO J 1987; 6: 605–610.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Belikova AM, Zarytova VF, Grineva NI. Synthesis of ribonucleosides and diribonucleoside phosphates containing 2-chloroethylamine and nitrogen mustard residues.Tetrahedron Lett 1967;37:3557–3562.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Urbain JL, Shore S, Vekemans MC, Manzone T, Shea F, Charkes ND, Reddy EP, Malmud LS. Does scintigraphic imaging of antisense probe make sense? Eur J Nucl Med 1994, 10: A207.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lu X-M L, Fishman AJ, Jyawook SL, Hendricks K, Tompkins RG, Yarmush ML. Antisense DNA delivery in vivo: liver targeting by receptor-mediated uptake. J Nucl Med 1994; 35: 269–275.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Urbain, J.L.C., Shore, S.K., Vekemans, M.C. et al. Scintigraphic imaging of oncogenes with antisense probes: does it make sense?. Eur J Nucl Med 22, 499–504 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00817271

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00817271

Key words

Navigation