Skip to main content
Log in

A corrected procedure and consistent interpretation for temperature programmed reduction of supported MoO3

  • Published:
Catalysis Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Experiments in which bulk MoO3 has been diluted in silica or alumina reveal a “corrected” TPR pattern in which the bulk oxide reduces at the same temperature as the supported crystalline phase. The reduction patterns for diluted bulk MoO3, in conjunction with an XRD study of the reduction process and a recent comprehensive speciation theory have greatly assisted the assignment of peaks for silica and alumina supported samples. A simple interpretation of TPR patterns has been applied with good agreement to the body of MoO3 TPR literature. With consistent interpretation, temperature programmed reduction might be employed with increased confidence to characterize supported MoO3 and perhaps other supported oxides.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Thomas et al., J. Catal. 84 (1983) 275.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Thomas et al., J. Catal. 76 (1982) 241.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C.V. Caceres et al., J. Catal. 95 (1985) 501.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H.C. Yao, J. Catal. 70 (1981) 440.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Brito and J. Laine, Polyhedron 5 (1986) 179.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Lopez Cordero, F.J.G. Llambias and A.L. Agudo, Appl. Catal. 74 (1991) 125.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H.M. Ismail et al., Appl. Catal. 72 (1991) L1.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. del Arco et al., J. Mater. Sci 27 (1992) 2960.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. del Arco et al., J. Catal. 141 (1993) 48.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M.R. Smith et al., Catal. Lett. 9 (1993) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. de Boer, PhD dissert., University of Utrecht, The Netherlands (1992) ch. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Arnoldy, PhD dissert., University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands (1985) ch. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G.C. Bond, S. Flamerz and L. van Wijk, Catal. Today 1 (1987) 229.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. del Arco et al., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 89 (1993) 1071.

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. Arnoldy and J.A. Moulijn, J. Catal. 83 (1985) 38.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G.C. Bond and A.F. Tahir, Appl. Catal. 71 (1991) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  17. F. Roozeboom et al., J. Phys. Chem. 84 (1980) 2783.

    Google Scholar 

  18. C.C. Williams et al., J. Phys. Chem. 95 (1991) 8781.

    Google Scholar 

  19. C.C. Williams et al., J. Phys. Chem. 95 (1991) 8791.

    Google Scholar 

  20. G. Deo and I.E. Wachs, J. Phys. Chem. 95 (1991) 5889.

    Google Scholar 

  21. I.E. Wachs et al., J. Mol. Catal. 82 (1993) 443.

    Google Scholar 

  22. P. Arnoldy, J.C.M. de Jonge and J.A. Moulijn, J. Phys. Chem. 89 (1985) 4517.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Datta and J.R. Regalbuto, J. Catal. 133 (1992) 55.

    Google Scholar 

  24. D.A.M. Monte and A. Baiker, J. Catal. 83 (1993) 323.

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. de Boer et al., Catal. Lett. 11 (1991) 227.

    Google Scholar 

  26. N. Santhanam et al., Catal. Today, in press.

  27. J.-W. Ha and J.R. Regalbuto, in preparation.

  28. M.A. Vuurman and I.E. Wachs, J. Phys. Chem. 96 (1992) 5008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Regalbuto, J.R., Ha, J.W. A corrected procedure and consistent interpretation for temperature programmed reduction of supported MoO3 . Catal Lett 29, 189–207 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00814265

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00814265

Keywords

Navigation