European Journal of Nuclear Medicine

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 212–215 | Cite as

Dose to patients through nuclear medicine procedures in a department in northern Greece

  • Giannis Papadopoulos
  • Demetrios Okkalides
Original Article

Abstract

Diagnostic nuclear medicine procedures in a large hospital in northern Greece during 1984–1988 have been surveyed in order to estimate the radiation burden to the patients. The mean effective dose equivalent (EDE) was found to be 1.96 mSv/examination and 2.46 mSv/patient, allowing for the fact that a number of patients underwent more than one examination. Apart from EDE, absorbed dose has been calculated for bone marrow, thyroid, gonads, kidneys and bladder. Patients undergoing multiple examinations have been used to calculate true ‘patient dose distribution’ as well as ‘patient time-weighted dose distribution’. Because of the predominance of renal examinations, 8.5 fatal renal malignancies are expected per 100000 patients.

Key words

EDE Patient dose Nuclear medicine dosimetry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beekhuis H (1988) Population radiation absorbed dose from nuclear medicine procedures in the Netherlands. Health Phys 54:287–291Google Scholar
  2. Dimitriou P, Fretzagou A, Nicolaidou P, Gritzali F, Kasfiki A, Karpathios T (1984) Estimates of dose to the bladder during direct radionuclide cystography. J Nucl Med 25:792–795Google Scholar
  3. Erlt S, Deckart H, Tautz M (1984) Radiation dose and risk of patients through nuclear medicine procedures in the GDR. A comparison of 1978 and 1981. Eur J Nucl Med 9:241–244Google Scholar
  4. International Commission on Radiological Protection (1977) Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 26, Annals of ICRP 1(3). Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. International Commission on Radiological Protection (1988) Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. ICRP Publication 53. Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Mettler FA Jr, Christie JH, Williams AG Jr, Moseley RD Jr, Kelsey CA (1986) Population characteristics and absorbed dose to the population from nuclear medicine: United States-1982. Health Phys 50:619–628Google Scholar
  7. Poppitz R (1982) Patient exposure and radiation risk in Bulgarian diagnostic nuclear medicine. I. Survey of diagnostic nuclear medicine procedures in Bulgaria in 1980. Nuklear Medizin 21:85–98Google Scholar
  8. Thorne MC (1987) Principles of the ICRP system of dose limitation. Br J Radiol 60:32–38Google Scholar
  9. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (1982) Ionizing radiation: sources and biological effects (report to the General Assembly with annexes). UN publication sales no. E.82.IX8. UN, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giannis Papadopoulos
    • 1
  • Demetrios Okkalides
    • 1
  1. 1.Radiation Physics Laboratory‘Ippokrateio’ General HospitalThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations