Selective adsorption of immune DNA-synthesizing lymphocytes on corresponding target cells
- 12 Downloads
Lymphocytes of inbred lines of mice immunized with an allogeneic tumor were labeled with thymidine-H3 in vitro and in vivo, washed, and incubated with target cells in the presence of “cold” thymidine. Rapid and specific adsorption of the fraction of medium and small lymphocytes, synthesizing DNA, on the corresponding target cells was demonstrated by autoradiography. After preliminary incubation of unlabeled immune lymphocytes with target cells for 2 h, followed by the addition of thymidine-H3 to the culture medium at various time intervals, the percentage of labeled small and medium lymphocytes adsorbed on the target cells fell, to approach its initial level after contact for 8 h. It is postulated that the small and medium lymphocytes synthesizing DNA are “killers” that are not transformed into blast cells on contact with target cells.
Key Wordsimmune lymphocytes target cells DNA synthesis selective adsorption
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.B. D. Brondz, “Specificity of immune lymphocytes in cultures of allogeneic cells,” Zh. Obshch. Biol., No. 2, 208 (1969).Google Scholar
- 2.B. D. Brondz, S. N. Sura, and A. E. Snegireva, “Morphological and autoradiographic changes in immune lymphocytes during interaction with allogeneic target cells,” Byull. Éksperim. Biol. i Med., No. 1, 70 (1972).Google Scholar
- 3.B. D. Brondz, I. F. Kotomina, L. S. Eliseeva, et al., “Relationship between killer and rosette-forming cells reactive to H-2 antigens,” Scand. J. Immunol.,2, 463 (1973).Google Scholar
- 4.L. C. Andersson and P. Häyry, “Allograft immunity in vitro. V. Generation of cytotoxic effector cells in mixed lymphocyte culture and the specificity of target cell lysis,” Cell Immunol.,8, 470 (1973).Google Scholar
- 5.L. Cohen and M. L. Howe, “Synergism between subpopulations of thymus-derived cells mediating the proliferative and effector phases of the mixed lymphocyte reaction,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (Washington),70, 2707 (1973).Google Scholar
- 6.M. Howe, L. Berman, and L. Cohen, “Relationship between proliferative and effector phase of the mixed lymphocyte reaction and graft versus host reaction,” J. Immunol.,111, 1243 (1973).Google Scholar
- 7.J. Pelet, K. T. Brunner, A. A. Nording, et al., “The relative distribution of cytotoxic lymphocytes and of alloantibody-forming cells in albumin-density gradients,” Europ. J. Immunol.,1, 238 (1971).Google Scholar
- 8.K. Shortman, K. T. Brunner, and J.-C. Cerottini, “Separation of stages in the development of the T-cells involved in cell-mediated immunity,” J. Exp. Med.,135, 1375 (1972).Google Scholar
- 9.S. D. Stobo, W. E. Paul, and C. S. Henney, “Functional heterogeneity of murine lymphoid cells. IV. Allogeneic mixed lymphocyte reactivity and cytolytic activity as functions of distinct ‘T’ cell subsets,”Google Scholar
- 10.S. D. Wagner, “The correlation between the proliferative and the cytotoxic responses of mouse lymphocytes to allogeneic cells in vitro,” J. Immunol.,109, 630 (1972).Google Scholar
- 11.D. B. Wilson, J. C. Howards, and P. C. Nowell, “Some biological aspects of lymphocytes reactive to strong histocompatibility alloantigens,” Transplant. Rev.,12, 3 (1972).Google Scholar