Skip to main content
Log in

A study of mental health administrators and systems utilizing a four-part rural/urban taxonomy

  • Articles
  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study of administrators working in public-sector community-level mental health systems was undertaken. Three hundred and fourteen managers representing 109 systems in both urban and rural settings were interviewed, with 91 percent providing completed questionnaires. Multiple discriminant analyses indicated significant differences in perception of ruralness: personal, job, and system characteristics: and nonwork dimensions. Administrators differed in what they did on the job, not in responses (e.g., turnover, stress) to their work. The rural manager seems more a generalist, but other stereotypes of the nature of rural mental health management and managers were contraindicated. Implications of the data and further research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barton, W. E., & Barton, G.Mental Health Administration: Principles and Practice. Human Sciences Press, Inc., New York, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beale, C. L., & Fuguitt, G. V. The new pattern of nonmetropolitan population change. In K. E. Taeuber, L. Bumpass. & J. A. Swett (Eds.),Social Demography. Academic Press, New York, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosak, J., & Perlman, B. A review of the definition of rural.Journal of Rural Community Psychology, 1982 3, 3–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, S.The Administration of Mental Health Services Charles C. Thomas. Springfield, IL, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, S. Proceedings of the first annual meeting of the American College of Mental Health Administration.Administration in Mental Health, 1982 9, 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, T. B. Metropolitan influence on United States farmland use and capital intensivity.Rural Sociology, 1980 45, 501–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, P. A., & Murray, J. D. (Eds.),Handbook of Rural Community Mental Health Human Sciences Press. Inc., New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Management and Budget. Statistical Policy Division.Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas. Revised Edition, U.S. Government Printing Offices, Washington, D.C., 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzweller, H. K. Migration and the changing rural scene.Rural Sociology, 1979 44, 7–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.1970 Census User's Guide. Government Printing Office. Washington, D.C., October 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., England, G. W., & Lofquist, L. H.Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. University of Minnesota. Industrial Relations Center. Work Adjustment Project. Minneapolis, MN., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by a NIMH grant #T24 MH 15907-1. The authors thank Glenn Fuguitt for his insightful comments and assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perlman, B., Hartman, E.A. & Bosak, J. A study of mental health administrators and systems utilizing a four-part rural/urban taxonomy. Community Ment Health J 20, 202–211 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00808107

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00808107

Keywords

Navigation