Abstract
A study of administrators working in public-sector community-level mental health systems was undertaken. Three hundred and fourteen managers representing 109 systems in both urban and rural settings were interviewed, with 91 percent providing completed questionnaires. Multiple discriminant analyses indicated significant differences in perception of ruralness: personal, job, and system characteristics: and nonwork dimensions. Administrators differed in what they did on the job, not in responses (e.g., turnover, stress) to their work. The rural manager seems more a generalist, but other stereotypes of the nature of rural mental health management and managers were contraindicated. Implications of the data and further research are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barton, W. E., & Barton, G.Mental Health Administration: Principles and Practice. Human Sciences Press, Inc., New York, 1982.
Beale, C. L., & Fuguitt, G. V. The new pattern of nonmetropolitan population change. In K. E. Taeuber, L. Bumpass. & J. A. Swett (Eds.),Social Demography. Academic Press, New York, 1978.
Bosak, J., & Perlman, B. A review of the definition of rural.Journal of Rural Community Psychology, 1982 3, 3–35.
Feldman, S.The Administration of Mental Health Services Charles C. Thomas. Springfield, IL, 1980.
Feldman, S. Proceedings of the first annual meeting of the American College of Mental Health Administration.Administration in Mental Health, 1982 9, 3–15.
Heaton, T. B. Metropolitan influence on United States farmland use and capital intensivity.Rural Sociology, 1980 45, 501–8.
Keller, P. A., & Murray, J. D. (Eds.),Handbook of Rural Community Mental Health Human Sciences Press. Inc., New York, 1980.
Office of Management and Budget. Statistical Policy Division.Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas. Revised Edition, U.S. Government Printing Offices, Washington, D.C., 1975.
Schwarzweller, H. K. Migration and the changing rural scene.Rural Sociology, 1979 44, 7–23.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.1970 Census User's Guide. Government Printing Office. Washington, D.C., October 1970.
Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., England, G. W., & Lofquist, L. H.Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. University of Minnesota. Industrial Relations Center. Work Adjustment Project. Minneapolis, MN., 1967.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a NIMH grant #T24 MH 15907-1. The authors thank Glenn Fuguitt for his insightful comments and assistance.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Perlman, B., Hartman, E.A. & Bosak, J. A study of mental health administrators and systems utilizing a four-part rural/urban taxonomy. Community Ment Health J 20, 202–211 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00808107
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00808107